Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

High Court Upholds FIR in Corruption Case: Proceedings Initiated Against the Petitioner Are All Backed by the Statute

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling today, the High Court of Karnataka, led by Hon’ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna, upheld the validity of the FIR registered against MLA Sri Zameer Ahmed Khan by the Anti Corruption Bureau (ACB) for alleged disproportionate assets and corruption. The court observed, “Proceedings initiated against the petitioner are all backed by the statute,” highlighting the legal robustness of the case.

The FIR, based on information from the Enforcement Directorate under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, was challenged by the petitioner for lacking a preliminary inquiry and proper authorization. However, the High Court dismissed these contentions, emphasizing the statutory compliance and necessity for a thorough investigation.

Justice Nagaprasanna’s observation underlines the court’s stance on the criticality of upholding legal procedures in cases of alleged corruption and disproportionate assets. “It’s not a case where no crime is registered in which involvement of the petitioner is absent,” the judge noted, pointing out the due diligence followed by the ACB and Enforcement Directorate in registering the FIR.

The ruling also addressed the argument against the lack of preliminary inquiry. The court noted a significant time gap between the Enforcement Directorate’s communication and the FIR registration, indicating a period of preliminary inquiry.

In a detailed judgment, the court observed that the allegations against Sri Zameer Ahmed Khan of assets being disproportionate by 2031% to his known income necessitated a thorough investigation under the Prevention of Corruption Act.

The decision holds significant implications for the legal landscape concerning corruption and asset accumulation by public servants. It reinforces the judiciary’s commitment to ensuring that investigations into such serious allegations are conducted within the framework of law, emphasizing thoroughness and statutory compliance.

Date of Decision: 18 November 2023

SRI.ZAMEER AHMED KHAN VS  THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY LOKAYUKTA P.S.

Latest Legal News