MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

High Court Upholds FIR in Corruption Case: Proceedings Initiated Against the Petitioner Are All Backed by the Statute

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling today, the High Court of Karnataka, led by Hon’ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna, upheld the validity of the FIR registered against MLA Sri Zameer Ahmed Khan by the Anti Corruption Bureau (ACB) for alleged disproportionate assets and corruption. The court observed, “Proceedings initiated against the petitioner are all backed by the statute,” highlighting the legal robustness of the case.

The FIR, based on information from the Enforcement Directorate under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, was challenged by the petitioner for lacking a preliminary inquiry and proper authorization. However, the High Court dismissed these contentions, emphasizing the statutory compliance and necessity for a thorough investigation.

Justice Nagaprasanna’s observation underlines the court’s stance on the criticality of upholding legal procedures in cases of alleged corruption and disproportionate assets. “It’s not a case where no crime is registered in which involvement of the petitioner is absent,” the judge noted, pointing out the due diligence followed by the ACB and Enforcement Directorate in registering the FIR.

The ruling also addressed the argument against the lack of preliminary inquiry. The court noted a significant time gap between the Enforcement Directorate’s communication and the FIR registration, indicating a period of preliminary inquiry.

In a detailed judgment, the court observed that the allegations against Sri Zameer Ahmed Khan of assets being disproportionate by 2031% to his known income necessitated a thorough investigation under the Prevention of Corruption Act.

The decision holds significant implications for the legal landscape concerning corruption and asset accumulation by public servants. It reinforces the judiciary’s commitment to ensuring that investigations into such serious allegations are conducted within the framework of law, emphasizing thoroughness and statutory compliance.

Date of Decision: 18 November 2023

SRI.ZAMEER AHMED KHAN VS  THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY LOKAYUKTA P.S.

Latest Legal News