Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute Properties Acquired By Gift During Marriage Remain Separate Property Of Spouse Under French Civil Code; Husband Entitled To Half Share Only In Community Assets: Madras High Court Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Closure Of Human Trafficking Complaint, Flags Lack Of Bona Fides Access To Justice Cannot Be Denied When Tribunal Is Not Functioning': Calcutta High Court Holds Writ Maintainable Under Article 226 Amid Stalled Conciliation Proceedings Violation Of Natural Justice Overrides Bar On Maintainability Under Section 18 MSMED Act: Orissa High Court Panic In A Train Does Not Mean Self-Destruction: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants ₹8 Lakh Compensation For Passenger's Death In Stampede Section 101 JJ Act | Date Of Knowledge Of Order, Not Mere Knowledge Of Disposal, Commences Limitation Period: Delhi High Court Telangana High Court Quashes Order Declaring Inam Land As Govt Property Without Determining Occupancy Rights Proviso To Section 125(3) CrPC Does Not Limit Enforcement Of Monetary Relief Orders Under Section 20 DV Act: Telangana High Court Regularization Of Deviation Within Permissible Plot Envelope Governed By Uniform Fee Schedule, Arbitrary 5X Penalty Unsustainable: J&K&L High Court Man Who Blackmailed Woman With Her Own Nude Photos To Rape Her Repeatedly Can't Escape Conviction Merely Because His Voice Sample Wasn't Taken: Delhi High Court Arbitration Clause In Sale Agreement Cannot Be Invoked If Subject Matter Involves Third-Party Title Disputes: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Errs In Dismissing Amendment Plea If New Facts Emerge From Written Statement: Punjab & Haryana High Court 'No Compensation For Own Wrong': Gujarat High Court Rules Tortfeasors & Legal Heirs Cannot Claim Motor Accident Damages Under Section 166 MV Act Allahabad High Court Pulls Up Police And Magistrates Over Illegal Remand Of Juvenile Accused Section 13(1)(ia) & (ib) Hindu Marriage Act | Spouse Seeking Divorce On Grounds Of Cruelty And Desertion Must Prove Allegations With Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Cannot Let Land Become Banjar: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Appointment Of Receiver Under BNSS Amidst Pending Civil Title Disputes Section 8 Arbitration Act | Executing Court Must Refer Parties To Arbitration If Dispute Falls Within Scope Of Compromise Decree: Madhya Pradesh High Court Suit For Damages Arising Out Of Tortious Injury Barred By Limitation If Not Filed Within One Year: Punjab & Haryana High Court 72-Hour Gap Not Proximate: Calcutta High Court Quashes Murder Conviction, Holds 'Last Seen' Theory Inapplicable When Time Gap Is Wide Original Owner Cannot Create Trust Over Property Already Sold; Separate Relief For Title Declaration Not Required: Madras High Court

High Court Sets Precedent on Importance of Credible Evidence in Financial Disputes: ‘Without Original Books of Account, Claims in Financial Transactions Fall Short’ – Justice Sanjeev Narula”

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment that underscores the critical importance of credible evidence in financial disputes, the Delhi High Court, led by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Narula, has set aside a previous decree in a dispute between Afcons Infrastructure Ltd. And Major Balwan Singh, revolving around the payment for diesel supply in a construction project.

The judgment, pronounced on December 1, 2023, emphasizes the crucial role of detailed and corroborative evidence in substantiating financial claims. Justice Narula, in his decisive observation, stated, “Without the original books of account, the suit, which primarily hinges on the twelve invoices, should not have been adjudicated based solely on their mere presentation.” This statement reflects the court’s insistence on the need for concrete evidence in such disputes.

The case, which initially saw a decree mandating the construction company, Afcons Infrastructure Ltd. (Appellant), to pay Rs. 4,08,715/- with 12% interest per annum, was challenged on the grounds of insufficient evidence. The Appellants contended that the payments had been made and recorded, whereas the Respondent failed to produce essential books of account or detailed evidence of outstanding invoices.

Justice Narula highlighted the inadequacies in the trial court’s judgment, noting that the failure to produce books of account was a significant shortcoming. “The existence of invoices was never in dispute,” he remarked, “The central issue was whether the amounts invoiced were still outstanding.”

The High Court’s decision, which overturned the earlier judgment, reinstates the importance of adhering to the principles of evidence, especially in financial litigations. The court’s ruling also accentuates the responsibility of parties in financial disputes to provide sufficient, credible evidence to support their claims.

Date of Decision 01st December, 2023

Afcons-Ltd Vs Major-Balwan-Civil

Latest Legal News