At the Stage of Framing Charge, Presumption Suffices; Suicide Note and Grave Suspicion Enough: Allahabad High Court Refuses to Quash Charge Under Section 306 IPC 173 CrPC | Framing of Charge Marks End of Investigation—Complainant Cannot Reopen Probe Merely by Citing Police Lapses: Bombay High Court Recovery Alone Cannot Prove Guilt: Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Photos, Videos Must Go: Supreme Court Binds Warring Spouses to Clean Up Social Media in Matrimonial Settlement Standard for Bail Under Section 319 CrPC Is Higher Than Framing of Charge, But Short of Conviction: Supreme Court Grants Bail to Accused Summoned Mid-Trial State Cannot Arbitrarily Deny Subsidies to 'New Industrial Units' by Retrospectively Applying Expansion Caps: Supreme Court Companies Act | Offence Under Section 448 Is Covered Under Section 447: Supreme Court Bars Private Complaint Without SFIO Nod “See-To-It” Obligation Is Not A Guarantee Under Indian Law: Supreme Court Clarifies Scope Of Section 126 ICA In IBC Disputes Mere Employment of Litigant’s Relatives in Police or Court Doesn't Prove Judicial Bias: Supreme Court Sets Aside Transfer of Criminal Case Reserved Candidate Availing Relaxed Standards in Prelims Cannot Migrate to General Quota for Cadre Allocation: Supreme Court Mere Vesting Does Not Mean Possession: Supreme Court Rules ULC Proceedings Abated For Failure To Serve Mandatory Notice To Actual Occupants Contempt of Courts Act | Natural Justice in Administrative Action: Supreme Court Directs West Bengal Govt to Re-Adjudicate Teachers' Arrears Claims Live-In Relationship with Married Man Not a ‘Relationship in the Nature of Marriage’ Under Domestic Violence Act: Bombay High Court Applies Supreme Court Guidelines Income Tax Act | Substitution of Shares held as Stock-in-Trade upon Amalgamation constitutes Taxable Business Income if Commercially Realisable: Supreme Court Judges Cannot Enact Their Own Protocols During Bail Hearings: Supreme Court Sets Aside Sweeping Age Determination Directions In POCSO If There Is Knowledge That Injury Is Likely To Cause Death, But No Intention Falls Under Section 304 Part II:  Supreme Court High Court Ignored POCSO’s Statutory Rigour, Committed Grave Error in Granting Bail: Supreme Court Cancels Bail of Gang-Rape Accused Section 22 HSA | Co-Heirs Have Statutory Right of Pre-Emption Even in Urban Property: Punjab & Haryana High Court 138 NI Act | Issuance of Separate Cheques Gives Rise to Independent Causes of Action, Even if Drawn for Same Underlying Transaction: Supreme Court

High Court Sets Precedent on Importance of Credible Evidence in Financial Disputes: ‘Without Original Books of Account, Claims in Financial Transactions Fall Short’ – Justice Sanjeev Narula”

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment that underscores the critical importance of credible evidence in financial disputes, the Delhi High Court, led by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Narula, has set aside a previous decree in a dispute between Afcons Infrastructure Ltd. And Major Balwan Singh, revolving around the payment for diesel supply in a construction project.

The judgment, pronounced on December 1, 2023, emphasizes the crucial role of detailed and corroborative evidence in substantiating financial claims. Justice Narula, in his decisive observation, stated, “Without the original books of account, the suit, which primarily hinges on the twelve invoices, should not have been adjudicated based solely on their mere presentation.” This statement reflects the court’s insistence on the need for concrete evidence in such disputes.

The case, which initially saw a decree mandating the construction company, Afcons Infrastructure Ltd. (Appellant), to pay Rs. 4,08,715/- with 12% interest per annum, was challenged on the grounds of insufficient evidence. The Appellants contended that the payments had been made and recorded, whereas the Respondent failed to produce essential books of account or detailed evidence of outstanding invoices.

Justice Narula highlighted the inadequacies in the trial court’s judgment, noting that the failure to produce books of account was a significant shortcoming. “The existence of invoices was never in dispute,” he remarked, “The central issue was whether the amounts invoiced were still outstanding.”

The High Court’s decision, which overturned the earlier judgment, reinstates the importance of adhering to the principles of evidence, especially in financial litigations. The court’s ruling also accentuates the responsibility of parties in financial disputes to provide sufficient, credible evidence to support their claims.

Date of Decision 01st December, 2023

Afcons-Ltd Vs Major-Balwan-Civil

Latest Legal News