Special Appeal Maintainable If Single Judge's Order Relates To Authority Acting Without Statutory Appellate Jurisdiction: Allahabad High Court Recall Of Witness For Cross-Examination Permissible On Newly Framed Issue Post-Remand Even If Disposal Timeline Is Fixed: Karnataka High Court Litigant Cannot Overcome Law Of Limitation By Shifting Blame On Counsel Through Inconsistent Stands: Madras High Court Cross-Cases Cannot Be Clubbed If Co-Accused In Complaint Case Is Absconding & Complainant Delayed Process: Allahabad High Court Cross-Cases Cannot Be Clubbed If Co-Accused In Complaint Case Is Absconding & Complainant Delayed Process: Allahabad High Court Preventive Detention Not Warranted If Person Can Be Dealt With Under Ordinary Laws; No Effort To Arrest In Pending Cases: Supreme Court Accused Languishing In Jail For 9 Years Deserves Bail; Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 Violated: Supreme Court Election Disputes Must Be Resolved Expeditiously; Long Stays Render Adjudication A Mockery Of Justice: Madras High Court Delhi High Court Suspends LOC, Permits Businessman To Travel Abroad For Healthcare Conferences; Cites Roots In Society & Past Compliance Section 138 NI Act Complaint Not Maintainable By Third Party Who Is Neither Payee Nor Holder In Due Course: Allahabad High Court Writ Petition Cannot Be Dismissed On ‘Forum Non Conveniens’ If Respondent's Office Is Within Court's Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Supreme Court Doubts 'Sajjan Singh' Ruling; Refers To Larger Bench Whether Third Judge Can Re-examine Unanimous Findings Under Section 392 CrPC SARFAESI Sale Vitiated If Balance 75% Bid Amount Is Paid Beyond 15 Days Without Written Extension Agreement: Supreme Court Delhi High Court Can't Refuse Writ Petition Against BSF Dismissal Merely Because Cause Of Action Arose Outside Delhi: Supreme Court Private Rights Must Yield To Public Interest: Andhra Pradesh High Court Directs Removal Of Encroachments On Public Road Review Jurisdiction Cannot Be Invoked To Re-Agitate Factual Disputes Or Seek Re-Hearing On Merits: Allahabad High Court Recovery Under Section 27 Evidence Act Vitiated If Police Already Present At Spot Before Arrival Of Panch Witnesses: Bombay High Court Mere Non-Compliance Or Delay In Procedure Under Section 52A NDPS Act Is An Irregularity, Not An Illegality Entitling Accused To Bail: Calcutta High Court Recovery Of Weapon Used In Commission Of Offence Not A Sine Qua Non For Conviction If Ocular Evidence Is Corroborated: Allahabad High Court Seized Vehicles Shouldn't Be Kept Idle To Rot In Police Stations, Utility Vanishes Due To Stagnation: Karnataka High Court Or 39 CPC | Trial Court Erred In Dismissing Injunction Application Despite Respondent's 'No Objection' To Restraining Share Transfer: Gauhati High Court Issuing NBW Merely For Absence Of Accused Already On Bail Is Improper; Liberty Cannot Be Dealt With Lightly: Orissa High Court 138 NI | Expert Examination Of Disputed Documents Essential For Just Adjudication If Complainant Denies Handwriting & Signatures: Rajasthan High Court Order 41 Rule 27 CPC Cannot Be Invoked To Fill Lacunae In Evidence If Party Voluntarily Closed Evidence In Trial Court: Delhi High Court

"High Court Sets Aside Conviction, Stating 'Identity of the Accused-Petitioner as the Driver of Offending Vehicle Not Established'"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has set aside the conviction of Narinder Singh, who was earlier found guilty under Sections 279 and 304A of the IPC by the trial court. The High Court observed that the "identity of the accused-petitioner as the driver of the offending vehicle was not at all established."

Justice Deepak Gupta, presiding over the case, noted that the prosecution's failure to provide cogent evidence led to the decision. "It is to be noted that the prosecution examined only 3 witnesses so as to prove its charges," the judge said, adding that none of these witnesses could confirm seeing the accused at the spot of the accident.

The case dates back to June 8, 2011, when a truck allegedly driven by Narinder Singh hit a tractor trolley, causing injuries to multiple people and leading to one fatality. Singh was arrested and later convicted by the trial court, a decision upheld by the Additional Sessions Judge in Amritsar.

However, the High Court found several lapses in the prosecution's case, including the absence of key witnesses and failure to conduct a test identification parade. "Prosecution did not examine the Investigating Officer of the case so as to prove the steps taken during investigation," Justice Gupta observed.

The petitioner had also made an alternative submission, stating that a compromise was reached with the legal heirs of the deceased, but the High Court did not consider this due to the fundamental lapses in establishing the identity of the accused.

"In view of the aforesaid circumstances, particularly non-establishing the identity of the accused-petitioner as the driver of offending vehicle, the conviction as recorded by the trial Court and as affirmed by the Appellate Court, cannot be sustained in the eyes of law," the judgement read.

The ruling has been welcomed by legal experts who believe it underscores the importance of thorough investigation and proper presentation of evidence in criminal cases.

The revision petition filed by Narinder Singh has been allowed, and the earlier judgments of conviction have been set aside, offering him a significant legal reprieve.

Date of Decision:19th September 2023

Narinder Singh  vs State of Punjab

Latest Legal News