Allegations In Matrimonial Disputes Must Be Specific And Supported By Foundation Facts To Avoid Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Supreme Court Modifies Sentence To Period Already Undergone Citing Medical Condition And Expression Of Remorse Qualification Of '10+2 System' Cannot Be Equated With Other Certifications Absent An Equivalence Clause: Supreme Court Essential Qualifications In Recruitment Cannot Be Diluted Or Subject To Judicial Equivalence: Supreme Court Court Has Discretion To Decide Genuineness Of Signature By Comparison; Not Essential To Invoke Expert Opinion In All Cases: Supreme Court Civil Disputes Cannot Be Converted Into Criminal Offences To Recover Money: Supreme Court Quashes FIR Under Section 420 IPC Taxing Authorities Must Classify Goods Based On Form At Time Of Sale, Not End Use: Supreme Court Suit For Declaration Of Status Must Seek Consequential Relief To Avoid Bar Of Proviso: Allahabad High Court Illegal Detention | Police Failure To Maintain CCTV Footage Invokes Adverse Presumption Under Sec 119 BSA Against State: Allahabad High Court Section 138 NI Act | Accused Rebuts Presumption By Proving Intimation Of Misplaced Cheque To Bank And Lack Of Documentation For Alleged Settlement: Andhra Pradesh High Court Garnishee Proceedings Under CPC | Disputed Debt Cannot Be Summarily Adjudicated Without Leading Evidence: Bombay High Court Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act 2022 | Magistrate’s Power Under Section 5 To Direct DNA Profiling Is Not Conditional Upon Consent: Calcutta High Court Conviction Based On 'Assumption And Presumption' Cannot Be Sustained: Bombay High Court Acquits Husband Limitation Act | Suit For Specific Performance Must Be Filed Within Reasonable Time Even If No Date For Performance Is Fixed: Delhi High Court Enrolment As Advocate | Bar Council Must Consider 'Equivalent Qualifications' Under Rule 4(a) Rules Of Legal Education: Karnataka High Court Section 482 BNSS | Pre-Arrest Bail Is Not A Matter Of Course; Must Show Special Case For Invoking Extraordinary Jurisdiction: Kerala High Court Hindu Succession Act | A Co-parcener Cannot Alienate Entire Property; Non-Impleaded Legal Heir Not Bound By Previous Decree: Madras High Court Purchaser During Pendency Of Suit Bound By Compromise Decree, Cannot Treat It As Void In Collateral Proceedings: Punjab & Haryana High Court Order 23 Rule 1-A CPC | In Partition Suits, Defendants Asserting A Share Can Seek Transposition If Original Plaintiffs Withdraw: Patna High Court Section 69 BNS | Suppression Of Subsisting Marriage Or Live-In Relationship During Marriage Proposal Constitutes 'Deceitful Means': Kerala High Court Anticipatory Bail | Mere Apprehension Of Investigating Agency Is Insufficient To Deny Bail Without Demonstrating Necessity Of Custodial Interrogation: Telangana High Court Income Tax Evasion | Criminal Prosecution Under Section 276C IT Act Cannot Sustain Once Foundation Assessment Order Is Set Aside: Punjab & Haryana High Court

"High Court Sets Aside Conviction, Stating 'Identity of the Accused-Petitioner as the Driver of Offending Vehicle Not Established'"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has set aside the conviction of Narinder Singh, who was earlier found guilty under Sections 279 and 304A of the IPC by the trial court. The High Court observed that the "identity of the accused-petitioner as the driver of the offending vehicle was not at all established."

Justice Deepak Gupta, presiding over the case, noted that the prosecution's failure to provide cogent evidence led to the decision. "It is to be noted that the prosecution examined only 3 witnesses so as to prove its charges," the judge said, adding that none of these witnesses could confirm seeing the accused at the spot of the accident.

The case dates back to June 8, 2011, when a truck allegedly driven by Narinder Singh hit a tractor trolley, causing injuries to multiple people and leading to one fatality. Singh was arrested and later convicted by the trial court, a decision upheld by the Additional Sessions Judge in Amritsar.

However, the High Court found several lapses in the prosecution's case, including the absence of key witnesses and failure to conduct a test identification parade. "Prosecution did not examine the Investigating Officer of the case so as to prove the steps taken during investigation," Justice Gupta observed.

The petitioner had also made an alternative submission, stating that a compromise was reached with the legal heirs of the deceased, but the High Court did not consider this due to the fundamental lapses in establishing the identity of the accused.

"In view of the aforesaid circumstances, particularly non-establishing the identity of the accused-petitioner as the driver of offending vehicle, the conviction as recorded by the trial Court and as affirmed by the Appellate Court, cannot be sustained in the eyes of law," the judgement read.

The ruling has been welcomed by legal experts who believe it underscores the importance of thorough investigation and proper presentation of evidence in criminal cases.

The revision petition filed by Narinder Singh has been allowed, and the earlier judgments of conviction have been set aside, offering him a significant legal reprieve.

Date of Decision:19th September 2023

Narinder Singh  vs State of Punjab

Latest Legal News