Appellate Court Can Allow Additional Evidence To Ensure Fair Adjudication Even If Not Produced In Trial: Madhya Pradesh High Court Police Can Freeze Bank Accounts Under Section 106 BNSS Upon Suspicion Of 'Proceeds Of Crime': Punjab & Haryana High Court 'No Penalty For Monthly MGQ Shortfall If Annual Target Met': Supreme Court Upholds Quashing Of Excise Department Demands For Liquor Licensees 'Murder Went Unavenged, But Courts Cannot Convict On Mere Assumptions': Supreme Court Acquits Accused In 1988 Murder Case, Quashes High Court's Remit Order 'NCSC Cannot Pass Mandatory Adjudicatory Orders Directing Payment Of Arrears': Supreme Court Clarifies Commission's Powers Under Article 338 "'Cannot Present Fait Accompli': Supreme Court Upholds Denial Of NOC To Airman For Skipping Prior Permission To Apply For Civil Post" Supreme Court Upholds 2017 Notification For Ex Post Facto Environmental Clearances, Quashes 2021 Office Memorandum As Impermissible Executive Overreach Workman Fails To Prove 240 Days Continuous Work; Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Denial Of Reinstatement For "Abandonment Of Service" Party Cannot Take Contradictory Stands In Same Case, Admissions In Pleadings Bind Them Under Order XII Rule 6 CPC: Telangana High Court Delayed Recovery Of Weapon From Open Space Casts Serious Doubt On Prosecution Story: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Murder Convicts Procedural Irregularities By Public Servants Serve As Circumstantial Evidence Of Conspiracy In Corruption Cases: Kerala High Court Blaming Previous Counsel For Omission Does Not Satisfy 'Due Diligence' Test To Amend Plaint After Trial Commences: Punjab & Haryana High Court Muslim Man's Second Marriage Under Special Marriage Act Void Despite Personal Law Permitting Bigamy: Karnataka High Court Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Criminal Antecedents Disentitles Accused To Discretionary Relief Of Bail: Orissa High Court Section 311 CrPC | Delay Or Absence Of Examination-In-Chief No Bar To Summon Material Witnesses: Allahabad High Court Revenue Authorities Lack Jurisdiction To Declare Genuineness Of Wills Or Validity Of Settlement Deeds; Parties Must Approach Civil Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court Demand Of Bribe Is Sine Qua Non For Conviction Under PC Act, Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money Not Enough: Bombay High Court Title And Ownership Irrelevant In Suit Under Section 6 Specific Relief Act; Plaint Liable To Be Rejected If Filed Beyond Six Months: Delhi High Court Receipt Of Pension By Widow Can Be Considered To Determine 'Just Compensation' But Not To Deprive Claimants Of Award: Calcutta High Court FSL Report Lacking Scientific Criteria And Data Is Inadmissible In Evidence: Allahabad High Court Issues Directives For Testing Viscera Standard Of Proof In Railway Accident Claims Is Preponderance Of Probabilities, Not Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Gujarat High Court No Second Statutory Appeal Lies Against Conviction By Appellate Court Reversing Acquittal; Revision Is Sole Remedy: Supreme Court Wives' Property Is Their Own, Not Husband's: Supreme Court REJECTS High Court's Succession Formula; Restores Clarity For Christian Inheritance

High Court Orders Vigilant Enforcement Against Social Boycott : No Place in a Civilized Society

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


High Court at Calcutta, presided over by Justice Jay Sengupta, issued a stern directive in W.P.A. 11715 of 2023, emphasizing the need for vigilant law enforcement in matters of social boycott and property disputes.

The case revolved around a property owner, represented by Mr. Somnath Mukherjee, who faced severe disturbances and a social boycott from private respondents. The dispute originated from objections raised by the petitioner against an illegally constructed temple in front of their property. Despite obtaining an injunction order from the Civil Court, the petitioner’s grievances persisted due to non-compliance by the private respondents.

In his observation, Justice Sengupta stated, “Any social boycott of a citizen or his family member has to be dealt with strictly by the Administration. This has no place in a civilized society.” This statement underlines the court’s firm stance against the archaic practice of social boycotts, highlighting the importance of upholding civil liberties in modern society.

The court further instructed the respondent police authorities to ensure peace and order in the area, mandating frequent patrols and vigilance. This directive comes as a response to the initiation of proceedings under Section 107 of the Code by the State, represented by Mr. Amritlal Chatterjee, following the petitioner’s complaint.

The ruling sets a precedent for handling similar cases where the enforcement of civil court orders is crucial. The High Court’s decision to dispose of the writ petition with specific observations for the police to act vigilantly in such matters reflects the judiciary’s active role in safeguarding citizen rights and maintaining social order.

The decision was warmly received by legal experts and civil society activists, who view it as a progressive step towards ensuring justice in complex social and legal disputes. The court’s emphasis on the administration’s duty to address social boycotts and its impact on the fabric of a civilized society has been particularly noted as a significant judicial observation in recent times.

Date of Decision;27th December 2023

Sri Ranajit Mondal  VS   The State of West Bengal & Ors.

 

Latest Legal News