Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

High Court Orders Vigilant Enforcement Against Social Boycott : No Place in a Civilized Society

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


High Court at Calcutta, presided over by Justice Jay Sengupta, issued a stern directive in W.P.A. 11715 of 2023, emphasizing the need for vigilant law enforcement in matters of social boycott and property disputes.

The case revolved around a property owner, represented by Mr. Somnath Mukherjee, who faced severe disturbances and a social boycott from private respondents. The dispute originated from objections raised by the petitioner against an illegally constructed temple in front of their property. Despite obtaining an injunction order from the Civil Court, the petitioner’s grievances persisted due to non-compliance by the private respondents.

In his observation, Justice Sengupta stated, “Any social boycott of a citizen or his family member has to be dealt with strictly by the Administration. This has no place in a civilized society.” This statement underlines the court’s firm stance against the archaic practice of social boycotts, highlighting the importance of upholding civil liberties in modern society.

The court further instructed the respondent police authorities to ensure peace and order in the area, mandating frequent patrols and vigilance. This directive comes as a response to the initiation of proceedings under Section 107 of the Code by the State, represented by Mr. Amritlal Chatterjee, following the petitioner’s complaint.

The ruling sets a precedent for handling similar cases where the enforcement of civil court orders is crucial. The High Court’s decision to dispose of the writ petition with specific observations for the police to act vigilantly in such matters reflects the judiciary’s active role in safeguarding citizen rights and maintaining social order.

The decision was warmly received by legal experts and civil society activists, who view it as a progressive step towards ensuring justice in complex social and legal disputes. The court’s emphasis on the administration’s duty to address social boycotts and its impact on the fabric of a civilized society has been particularly noted as a significant judicial observation in recent times.

Date of Decision;27th December 2023

Sri Ranajit Mondal  VS   The State of West Bengal & Ors.

 

Latest Legal News