Safety Shoes Used as Weapon Meets Mens Rea Requirement for Murder: Rajasthan HC on Bail Denial    |     Right to Be Considered for Promotion, Not a Right to Promotion: Supreme Court Clarifies Eligibility for Retrospective Promotion    |     Inherent Power of Courts Can Recall Admission of Insufficiently Stamped Documents: Supreme Court    |     Courts Cannot Substitute Their Opinion for Security Agencies in Threat Perception Assessments: J&K High Court Directs Reassessment of Political Leader's Threat Perception    |     Service Law | Violation of Natural Justice: Discharge Without Notice or Reason: Gauhati High Court Orders Reinstatement and Regularization of Circle Organizers    |     Jharkhand High Court Quashes Family Court Order, Reaffirms Jurisdiction Based on Minor’s Ordinary Residence in Delhi    |     Ex-Serviceman Status Ceases After First Employment in Government Job: Calcutta High Court Upholds SBI’s Cancellation of Ex-Serviceman's Appointment Over False Declaration of Employment    |     Maxim Res Ipsa Loquitur Applies When State Instrumentalities Are Directly Responsible: Delhi High Court Orders MCD to Pay ₹10 Lakhs Compensation for Death    |     Wilful Avoidance of Service Must Be Established Before Passing Ex Parte Order Under Section 126(2) CrPC: Patna High Court Sets Aside Ex Parte Maintenance Order    |     MP High Court Imposes Rs. 10,000 Costs for Prolonging Litigation, Upholds Eviction of Petitioners from Father's Property    |     When Detention Unnecessary Despite Serious Allegations of Fraud Bail Should be Granted: Kerala HC    |     Magistrate's Direction for Police Inquiry Under Section 202 CrPC Is Valid; Petitioner Must Await Investigation Outcome: Bombay High Court Dismisses Advocate's Petition as Premature    |     Relocation Alone Cannot Justify Transfer: Supreme Court Rejects Plea to Move Case from Nellore to Delhi, Orders Fresh Probe    |     Punjab & Haryana HC Double Bench Upholds Protection for Married Partners in Live-In Relationships, Denies Same for Minors    |     Tribunal’s Compensation Exceeding Claimed Amount Found Just and Fair Under Motor Vehicles Act: No Deduction Errors Warrant Reduction: Gujrat High Court    |     Smell of Alcohol in Post-Mortem Insufficient to Establish Intoxication: Rajasthan High Court Upholds Liability of Insurance Company in Motor Accident Case    |     No Grounds for Transfer: Free Bus Fare for Women in Telangana Reduces Travel Burden: Telangana High Court Rejects Wife's Petition to Transfer Divorce Case    |     Mechanical Referrals Invalid: "Deputy Registrar Must Apply Judicial Mind: Allahabad HC Quashes Deputy Registrar's Order in Arya Pratinidhi Sabha Election Dispute    |    

High Court Orders Vigilant Enforcement Against Social Boycott : No Place in a Civilized Society

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


High Court at Calcutta, presided over by Justice Jay Sengupta, issued a stern directive in W.P.A. 11715 of 2023, emphasizing the need for vigilant law enforcement in matters of social boycott and property disputes.

The case revolved around a property owner, represented by Mr. Somnath Mukherjee, who faced severe disturbances and a social boycott from private respondents. The dispute originated from objections raised by the petitioner against an illegally constructed temple in front of their property. Despite obtaining an injunction order from the Civil Court, the petitioner’s grievances persisted due to non-compliance by the private respondents.

In his observation, Justice Sengupta stated, “Any social boycott of a citizen or his family member has to be dealt with strictly by the Administration. This has no place in a civilized society.” This statement underlines the court’s firm stance against the archaic practice of social boycotts, highlighting the importance of upholding civil liberties in modern society.

The court further instructed the respondent police authorities to ensure peace and order in the area, mandating frequent patrols and vigilance. This directive comes as a response to the initiation of proceedings under Section 107 of the Code by the State, represented by Mr. Amritlal Chatterjee, following the petitioner’s complaint.

The ruling sets a precedent for handling similar cases where the enforcement of civil court orders is crucial. The High Court’s decision to dispose of the writ petition with specific observations for the police to act vigilantly in such matters reflects the judiciary’s active role in safeguarding citizen rights and maintaining social order.

The decision was warmly received by legal experts and civil society activists, who view it as a progressive step towards ensuring justice in complex social and legal disputes. The court’s emphasis on the administration’s duty to address social boycotts and its impact on the fabric of a civilized society has been particularly noted as a significant judicial observation in recent times.

Date of Decision;27th December 2023

Sri Ranajit Mondal  VS   The State of West Bengal & Ors.

 

Similar News