Recovery Of Excess Payment Made By Mistake Is Permissible When Employee Furnished An Undertaking To Refund: Supreme Court Anticipatory Bail Application Under Sec 482 BNSS Is Maintainable Even If No Formal Order Of Arrest Is Passed By CGST Authorities: Allahabad High Court Consensual Physical Relationship Following Three-Year Courtship Does Not Amount To Rape If Marriage Promise Fails: Supreme Court Criminalization Of Civil Disputes | Courts Must Not Engage In Speculative Reasoning While Dealing With Quashing Petitions Under Section 482 CrPC: Supreme Court Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money In The Absence Of Proof Of Demand Is Insufficient To Sustain Conviction Under Section 7 And 13 PC Act: Supreme Court High Court Cannot Quash NDPS Proceedings Merely Relying On Jurisprudence Regarding Evidentiary Value Of Confessional Statements: Supreme Court Extra-Judicial Confession Made While In Police Custody Is Inadmissible In Evidence: Supreme Court Taxing Authorities Must Levy Tax Based On The Form Of Goods At The Time Of Sale, Not On Potential End Use: Supreme Court Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders CBI Probe Into State Corruption Scams After Punjab Police Fails To Act On ED’s Section 66(2) PMLA Referral Section 482 CrPC | FIR Based On Consensual Relationship Gone Sour Cannot Be Sustained To Coerce Marriage: Supreme Court CISF Personnel Soliciting Bribes For Employment Is Guilty Of 'Gross Misconduct' Under Section 18 CISF Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court PIL | State Cannot Use Demolition Powers To Silence Whistleblowers Or Deflect Accountability: Punjab & Haryana High Court Criminal Proceedings Against In-Laws Without Specific Allegations Of Overt Acts Constitute Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Order 22 Rule 9 CPC | Admission In An Abated Suit Does Not Constitute Estoppel Against Landlord In A Fresh Eviction Proceeding: Calcutta High Court Arbitral Award Cannot Be Set Aside For Non-Adjudication Of Claims Specifically Abandoned By Parties: Delhi High Court Mere Long Possession Is Not Adverse Possession; Defendant Must Prove Hostile Animus To Deny Title Of True Owner: Himachal Pradesh High Court Reopening Of Assessment Under Sec 148A(d) Income Tax Act Cannot Be Based On 'Change Of Opinion' Without Fresh Tangible Material: Gujarat High Court Municipal Authorities Must Initiate Formal Proceedings And Grant Opportunity Of Hearing Before Sealing Premises:  Jharkhand High Court Court Cannot Compel Third-Party To Undergo DNA Test Unless Necessary For Just Adjudication: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Cannot Defer Bail Application Merely Because A Transfer Petition Is Pending In High Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 108 BNS | Mere Taunts Or Harassment Regarding Not Bearing A Male Child Do Not Constitute Abetment To Suicide: Rajasthan High Court

High Court of Delhi Grants Parole on Humanitarian Grounds to Convict Suffering from Serious Health Issues

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgement, the High Court of Delhi has granted parole to Eziefula Samuel Uchegbu, a convict serving a life sentence, on the basis of deteriorating health and medical needs. Justice Swarna Kanta Sharma, overseeing the case, emphasized the humanitarian grounds for this decision, stating, “When continuous medical treatment for the last two years has not resulted in any improvement but rather deterioration in the health of the petitioner, this Court, purely on humanitarian grounds, is inclined to grant parole.”

The petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Cr.P.C., sought the release of Uchegbu on parole for medical treatment. Uchegbu, convicted for offenses under various sections of the IPC and serving a life sentence, has been suffering from multiple health issues, including Umbilical Hernia, UTI, and difficulty in urinating.

Uchegbu’s parole application was initially rejected by the competent authority, citing his lack of valid permission to stay in India and Rule 1121 of the Delhi Prison Rules, 2018. The State opposed the parole, questioning Uchegbu’s relationship status with Ms. ‘X’, who he claimed as his wife. However, Uchegbu’s health condition, as detailed in the medical reports, presented a grim picture with no signs of improvement despite treatment in custody.

Justice Sharma rigorously analyzed the medical records and the jail conduct of the petitioner. The Court decided to grant parole, disregarding the marital status of Ms. ‘X’, and focusing on the critical health condition of the petitioner. “The medical element that petitioner has suffered from and continues to suffer from without showing any improvement in his symptoms despite medical treatment, in the hospital is not disputed,” Justice Sharma noted.

The Court granted a two-month parole to Uchegbu under specific conditions, including a personal bond of Rs.10,000 with surety, providing a contact number, and surrendering upon the expiry of the parole period.

Date of Decision: March 1, 2024

EZIEFULA SAMUEL UCHEGBU versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI

 

Latest Legal News