Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

High Court of Delhi Grants Parole on Humanitarian Grounds to Convict Suffering from Serious Health Issues

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgement, the High Court of Delhi has granted parole to Eziefula Samuel Uchegbu, a convict serving a life sentence, on the basis of deteriorating health and medical needs. Justice Swarna Kanta Sharma, overseeing the case, emphasized the humanitarian grounds for this decision, stating, “When continuous medical treatment for the last two years has not resulted in any improvement but rather deterioration in the health of the petitioner, this Court, purely on humanitarian grounds, is inclined to grant parole.”

The petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Cr.P.C., sought the release of Uchegbu on parole for medical treatment. Uchegbu, convicted for offenses under various sections of the IPC and serving a life sentence, has been suffering from multiple health issues, including Umbilical Hernia, UTI, and difficulty in urinating.

Uchegbu’s parole application was initially rejected by the competent authority, citing his lack of valid permission to stay in India and Rule 1121 of the Delhi Prison Rules, 2018. The State opposed the parole, questioning Uchegbu’s relationship status with Ms. ‘X’, who he claimed as his wife. However, Uchegbu’s health condition, as detailed in the medical reports, presented a grim picture with no signs of improvement despite treatment in custody.

Justice Sharma rigorously analyzed the medical records and the jail conduct of the petitioner. The Court decided to grant parole, disregarding the marital status of Ms. ‘X’, and focusing on the critical health condition of the petitioner. “The medical element that petitioner has suffered from and continues to suffer from without showing any improvement in his symptoms despite medical treatment, in the hospital is not disputed,” Justice Sharma noted.

The Court granted a two-month parole to Uchegbu under specific conditions, including a personal bond of Rs.10,000 with surety, providing a contact number, and surrendering upon the expiry of the parole period.

Date of Decision: March 1, 2024

EZIEFULA SAMUEL UCHEGBU versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI

 

Latest Legal News