Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) Is Not a Ritualistic Phrase — Plaintiff Must Prove It With Substance, Not Just Words: Karnataka High Court FIR in Disproportionate Assets Case Quashed: Patna High Court Slams SP for 'Non-Application of Mind' and 'Absence of Credible Source Information' Ownership of Vehicle Linked to Commercial Quantity of Heroin – Custodial Interrogation Necessary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 BNSS Death Caused by Rash Driving Is Not a Private Dispute — No FIR Quashing on Basis of Compromise in Section 106 BNS Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court No Bank Can Override Court Orders: Rajasthan High Court Slams Axis Bank for Unauthorized Withdrawal from Court-Ordered FD" Indian Courts Cannot Invalidate Foreign Arbitral Awards Passed Under Foreign Law: Madhya Pradesh High Court Enforces Texas-Based Award Despite Commercial Court’s Contrary Decree Sudden Quarrel over Mound of Earth — Not Murder but Culpable Homicide: Allahabad High Court Eligibility Flows from Birth, Not a Certificate Date: Delhi High Court Strikes Down Rule Fixing Arbitrary Cut-Off for OBC-NCL Certificates in CAPF (AC) Recruitment Bar Under Order II Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Invoked Where Specific Performance Was Legally Premature Due To Statutory Impediments: P&H High Court Calling Wife by Her Caste Name in Public Just Before Suicide is Immediate Cause of Self-Immolation: Madras High Court Upholds Husband’s Conviction Under Section 306 IPC No Work No Pay Is Not a Universal Rule: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dock Identification Without Prior TIP Is Absolutely Useless: P&H High Court Upholds Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case Filing Forged Court Pleadings in Union Government’s Name is Criminal Contempt: Karnataka High Court Sentences Litigant to Jail Execution of Will Proved, But Probate Justly Denied Due to Concealment of Property Sale: Delhi High Court Mere Designation Doesn’t Establish Criminal Liability: Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings Against ICICI Officials in Octroi Evasion Case Fraud on Power Voids the Order: Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Karnataka BJP Leader R. Ashoka, Slams Politically Motivated Prosecution Cause of Fire Is Immaterial If Fire Itself Is Insured Peril: Supreme Court Rebukes Insurer’s Repudiation Dragging a Trained Army Officer Up 20 Steps Without Resistance? The Story Lacks Credence: Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Army Officer’s Murder Semen Stains Alone Do Not Prove Rape: Supreme Court Acquits Doctor Accused of Rape No Mortgage, No SARFAESI: Supreme Court Rules Against NEDFi, Says Recovery Action in Nagaland Without Security Agreement Was Illegal Parity Cannot Be Denied by Geography: Supreme Court Holds Jharkhand Bound by Patna HC's Judgment, Orders Pay Revision for Industries Officer Once Power Flows Continuously from a Synchronized Turbine, It Is No Longer Infirm: Supreme Court Orders TANGEDCO to Pay Fixed Charges to Penna Electricity

High Court grants parole to murder convict for marriage to lover.

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Karnataka High Court has granted emergency parole to a murder convict named Anand (Prisoner No. 11699) for 15 days, so that he can marry his long-time lover. The court order was issued by Justice M. Nagaprasanna, who directed the prison authorities to release the convict from the forenoon of April 5, 2023, till the evening of April 20, 2023. However, the court has also imposed strict conditions on the release of the convict, requiring him to return to the prison and not commit any other offence during the parole period.

The case was brought to the High Court by the mother and lover of the convict, who filed a plea for his release on parole for a period of 15 days. Anand was serving a sentence for offences punishable under Sections 302, 201 r/w. Section 34 of the IPC and was sentenced to life imprisonment, which was modified to 10 years of imprisonment. The convict had been in judicial custody for the past six years, and his lover claimed to have been in love with him for the past nine years.

The High Court referred to the case of Cecilia Fernandes v. Inspector General Panaji, where the Bombay High Court had granted emergency parole to a detenu on account of his marriage. The High Court noted that it is appropriate to allow the plea owing to the peculiar facts of the case in the interest of justice.

The court ordered the prison authorities to stipulate strict conditions to ensure the safe return of the convict to the prison after the parole period. Advocate Raghavendra Gowda K. appeared on behalf of the petitioners, while AGA Vinod Kumar M. appeared on behalf of the respondents.

The Court allowed the plea and granted parole to the convict, enabling him to marry his lover.

Rathnamma & Anr. v. The State of Karnataka & Ors.

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/WP7270-23-31-03-2023.pdf"]

Latest Legal News