High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Divorce Cannot Be Granted Merely on WhatsApp Chats: Bombay High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Decree Based on Unproved Electronic Evidence State Cannot Demand Settlement Amount Yet Withhold Legitimate Refund: Bombay High Court Strikes Down MVAT Settlement Order Surveyor’s Report Is Not Sacrosanct; Arbitral Award Ignoring Vital Evidence Is Perverse: Delhi High Court Sets Aside Insurance Arbitration Award When Victim Lives Under Exclusive Control Of Accused, Burden Shifts To Accused To Explain What Happened: Calcutta High Court Medical Evidence Clearly Indicating Suicide Cannot Be Overlooked, Prosecution Must Prove Homicidal Death Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Andhra Pradesh High Court 'Candidates Acted With Full Knowledge of Consequences': Kerala High Court Reverses Order for Refund of 10% Exit Fee in Medical PG Mop-Up Admissions Dispensing with Departmental Inquiry Without Material is Arbitrary: Supreme Court Sets Aside Dismissal of Delhi Police Constable Power Of Attorney Holder Authorized To Enforce Pre-Emption Right Can File Suit, Death Of Principal Does Not Bar Legal Heirs: Orissa High Court Government Servant Convicted In Criminal Case Can Be Dismissed Without Departmental Enquiry: Tripura High Court Upholds Teacher’s Dismissal RTI Cannot Be Used To Bypass Statutory Bar On Police Case Diaries: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Penalty Against Police Officers Externment Cannot Be Based On Police Report And Stale Cases: Madhya Pradesh High Court Quashes District Magistrate’s Order Even Exonerated Accused Can Be Summoned During Trial: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Summoning Under Section 358 BNSS Benefit of Doubt Acquittal Not Equal to Honourable Acquittal: Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Police Constable Candidate Madras High Court Allows NEET-Failed Student To Appear In CBSE Class XII Mathematics Exam After Last-Minute Subject Switch By Parents Salary of Parents Cannot Be Used to Deny OBC Non-Creamy Layer Status in Absence of Post Equivalence: Supreme Court Father Who Rapes Minor Daughter Cannot Seek Leniency: Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment Construction Of Toilet Is Bare Necessity For Proper Use Of Premises, Expression "Own Use" Not Confined To Landlord's Personal Physical Use: Calcutta High Court 353 IPC | Conviction Cannot Rest On Uncorroborated Testimony Of Sole Witness When Other Evidence Contradicts Occurrence: Delhi High Court Upholds Acquittal 250 BNSS | 60-Day Discharge Period Is Procedural, Does Not Extinguish Accused's Right To Seek Discharge: Gujarat High Court Section 45 PMLA Cannot Become an Instrument of Endless Incarceration: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in ₹18 Crore Scholarship Scam Case Land Acquisition — Heirs Who Slept on Rights for 23 Years Cannot Claim Ignorance to Revive Dead Challenge: Karnataka High Court Institutional Hearing Is No Violation of Natural Justice: Kerala High Court Upholds BPCL’s Termination of Decades-Old Petroleum Dealership Witnesses Not Expected To Recount Past Incidents With Mathematical Precision, Minor Contradictions Don't Demolish Credibility: Orissa High Court If a Suit Is Ex Facie Barred by Limitation, the Court Has No Choice but to Dismiss It: P&H High Court

High Court grants parole to murder convict for marriage to lover.

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Karnataka High Court has granted emergency parole to a murder convict named Anand (Prisoner No. 11699) for 15 days, so that he can marry his long-time lover. The court order was issued by Justice M. Nagaprasanna, who directed the prison authorities to release the convict from the forenoon of April 5, 2023, till the evening of April 20, 2023. However, the court has also imposed strict conditions on the release of the convict, requiring him to return to the prison and not commit any other offence during the parole period.

The case was brought to the High Court by the mother and lover of the convict, who filed a plea for his release on parole for a period of 15 days. Anand was serving a sentence for offences punishable under Sections 302, 201 r/w. Section 34 of the IPC and was sentenced to life imprisonment, which was modified to 10 years of imprisonment. The convict had been in judicial custody for the past six years, and his lover claimed to have been in love with him for the past nine years.

The High Court referred to the case of Cecilia Fernandes v. Inspector General Panaji, where the Bombay High Court had granted emergency parole to a detenu on account of his marriage. The High Court noted that it is appropriate to allow the plea owing to the peculiar facts of the case in the interest of justice.

The court ordered the prison authorities to stipulate strict conditions to ensure the safe return of the convict to the prison after the parole period. Advocate Raghavendra Gowda K. appeared on behalf of the petitioners, while AGA Vinod Kumar M. appeared on behalf of the respondents.

The Court allowed the plea and granted parole to the convict, enabling him to marry his lover.

Rathnamma & Anr. v. The State of Karnataka & Ors.

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/WP7270-23-31-03-2023.pdf"]

Latest Legal News