Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers    |     Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court    |     Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case    |     Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case    |     Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute    |     Paternity Established Through SSC and Appointment Order, Legal Obligation to Maintain Unmarried Daughter: Andhra Pradesh High Court    |     No Appeal Shall Be Heard Without Disputed Tax Deposit: Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutionality of Section 96(b) of the Cantonment Act, 2006    |     Parties Must Choose Peace Over Litigation: Calcutta High Court Denies FIR Quashing in Family Dispute, Highlights Mediation Option    |     Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Recruitment of 1091 Assistant Professors and 67 Librarians In Punjab Due to Procedural Flaws    |     Res Judicata Bars Reconsideration of Adoption Validity in Second Round of Litigation: Jammu & Kashmir High Court    |     Candidates who use a party’s symbol must be deemed members of that party: Kerala High Court Upholds Disqualification for Defection    |     Inconsistencies in Eyewitness Accounts and Lack of Forensic Certainty Lead to Acquittal: Himachal Pradesh High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case    |     Delhi High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices Under Section 148 Due to Invalid Sanction by JCIT    |     Summons Under PMLA for Further Investigation Does Not Infringe Right Against Self-Incrimination: Telangana HC    |     Termination During Probation Is Lawful if Concealment of Criminal Case Is Proven: Allahabad HC    |     Disproportionate Fine Cannot Be Imposed for Recovery of 1 Liter of Country-made Liquor: Patna High Court    |     Prosecution failed to prove identity of remains and establish murder beyond reasonable doubt: Orissa High Court Acquit Ex-Husband    |     Despite 12 Injuries on the Victim, No Intention to Kill Found: Rajasthan High Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 304 Part-II IPC    |    

High Court Grants Extraordinary Pension to BSF Constable's Widow: Heart Attack on Duty Recognized as Service-Related

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana has set aside an earlier decision that denied extraordinary family pension to Raj Bala, the widow of a Border Security Force (BSF) Head Constable who died of a heart attack while on duty.

The High Court's ruling emphasized, "If the person is on duty and in the process suffers a heart attack and such condition of heart has not been traced to a natural cause earlier, then such an eventuality cannot be stated to be not on account of Government service."

Head Constable Joginder Singh, who was enrolled in the BSF in 1985, passed away in 2006 during a patrol on the Indo-Bangladesh Border. Despite the absence of any previous heart disease, his wife’s claim for an extraordinary family pension was initially rejected on the basis that a heart attack did not fall within the purview of notified diseases eligible for such pensions.

The Court's decision on November 3, 2023, cited two precedents where it was held that death due to a heart attack while on duty warrants the grant of extraordinary pension. The bench referred to the similar views expressed in earlier rulings from both the Delhi High Court and the Punjab & Haryana High Court.

Justice Jagmohan Bansal, while delivering the judgment, held that the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the cited judgments and pointed out the respondents' failure to present any contradictory law or view.

The Court directed the concerned authorities to release the extraordinary pension to Raj Bala within six months. The decision has been welcomed as a significant move to acknowledge the stressful conditions under which security personnel operate and the consequent health risks they face.

The judgment concluded with a strong affirmation that, "Even if there was a prior condition of heart and the same was aggravated due to his being on duty, even then the incumbent would have been entitled to extraordinary pension."

This judgment sets a precedent that ensures the welfare of the families of service personnel who lose their lives in the line of duty, potentially due to the strenuous nature of their service.

 Date of Decision: 03.11.2023

Raj Bala VS Union of India and others

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/PH-03-Nov-2023-Raj_Bala_vs_Union_Of_India_And_Others.pdf"]

Similar News