CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints Minimum Wages Cannot Be Ignored While Determining Just Compensation: Andhra Pradesh High Court Re-Fixes Income of Deceased Mason, Enhances Interest to 7.5% 34 IPC | Common Intention Is Inferred From Manner Of Attack, Weapons Carried And Concerted Conduct: Allahabad High Court Last Date of Section 4 Publication Is Crucial—Error in Date Cannot Depress Market Value: Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Beed Land Acquisition Appeals Order 26 Rule 10-A CPC | Rarest of Rare: When a Mother Denies Her Own Child: Rajasthan High Court Orders DNA Test to Decide Maternity Acquittal Is Not a Passport Back to Uniform: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Dismissal of Constable in NDPS Case Despite Trial Court Verdict Limitation Under Section 468 Cr.P.C. Cannot Be Ignored — But Section 473 Keeps the Door Open in the Interest of Justice: P&H HC Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness Employee Cannot Switch Cadre At His Sweet Will After Accepting Promotion: J&K High Court Rejects Claim For Retrospective Assistant Registrar Appointment Anticipatory Bail Cannot Expire With Charge-Sheet: Supreme Court Reiterates Liberty Is Not Bound by Procedural Milestones Order II Rule 2 Cannot Eclipse Amendment Power Under Order VI Rule 17: MP High Court Refuses to Stall Will-Based Title Suit Grounds of Arrest Must Be Personal, Not Formal – But Detailed Allegations Suffice: Kerala High Court Upholds Arrest in Sabarimala Gold Misappropriation Case Grounds of Arrest Are Not a Ritual – They Are a Constitutional Mandate Under Article 22(1): Allahabad High Court Sets Aside Arrest for Non-Supply of Written Grounds Sect. 25 NDPS | Mere Ownership Cannot Fasten NDPS Liability – ‘Knowingly Permits’ Must Be Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt: MP High Court Section 308 CrPC | Revocation of Pardon Is Not Automatic on Prosecutor’s Certificate: Karnataka High Court Joint Family and Ancestral Property Are Alien to Mohammedan Law: Gujarat High Court Sets Aside Injunction Right to Health Cannot Wait for Endless Consultations: Supreme Court Pulls Up FSSAI Over Delay in Front-of-Pack Warning Labels If A Son Dies Intestate Leaving Wife And Children, The Mother Has No Share: Karnataka High Court

High Court Grants Extraordinary Pension to BSF Constable's Widow: Heart Attack on Duty Recognized as Service-Related

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana has set aside an earlier decision that denied extraordinary family pension to Raj Bala, the widow of a Border Security Force (BSF) Head Constable who died of a heart attack while on duty.

The High Court's ruling emphasized, "If the person is on duty and in the process suffers a heart attack and such condition of heart has not been traced to a natural cause earlier, then such an eventuality cannot be stated to be not on account of Government service."

Head Constable Joginder Singh, who was enrolled in the BSF in 1985, passed away in 2006 during a patrol on the Indo-Bangladesh Border. Despite the absence of any previous heart disease, his wife’s claim for an extraordinary family pension was initially rejected on the basis that a heart attack did not fall within the purview of notified diseases eligible for such pensions.

The Court's decision on November 3, 2023, cited two precedents where it was held that death due to a heart attack while on duty warrants the grant of extraordinary pension. The bench referred to the similar views expressed in earlier rulings from both the Delhi High Court and the Punjab & Haryana High Court.

Justice Jagmohan Bansal, while delivering the judgment, held that the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the cited judgments and pointed out the respondents' failure to present any contradictory law or view.

The Court directed the concerned authorities to release the extraordinary pension to Raj Bala within six months. The decision has been welcomed as a significant move to acknowledge the stressful conditions under which security personnel operate and the consequent health risks they face.

The judgment concluded with a strong affirmation that, "Even if there was a prior condition of heart and the same was aggravated due to his being on duty, even then the incumbent would have been entitled to extraordinary pension."

This judgment sets a precedent that ensures the welfare of the families of service personnel who lose their lives in the line of duty, potentially due to the strenuous nature of their service.

 Date of Decision: 03.11.2023

Raj Bala VS Union of India and others

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/PH-03-Nov-2023-Raj_Bala_vs_Union_Of_India_And_Others.pdf"]

Latest Legal News