Ocular Evidence Prevails Over Medical Findings: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Despite Negative Semen Report & Police Lapses High Court Cannot Pass Inconsistent Orders: Supreme Court Quashes Demolition Order Passed Despite Earlier Restraint In CMDA Regularisation Dispute Supreme Court Upholds Validity Of Open University Degrees Obtained Prior To 2017 Cut-Off Must Be A Polluter Before Being Held Absolutely Liable: Supreme Court Sets Aside NGT Order Against Art Of Living Over Yamuna Event, Orders ₹5 Cr Refund Father Cannot Be Deprived Of Minor's Custody Unless Proved Unfit: Allahabad High Court Hands Over 4-Yr-Old Child To Father, Sets Aside Trial Court Order Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 Integral To Personal Liberty': Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Bail As 24 Witnesses Remain Unexamined No Specific Chemical Opinion That Seized Substance Was Ganja: Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal Under Section 2(iii)(b) NDPS Act Mere Pendency Of Criminal Cases Simplicitor No Ground For Externment': Karnataka High Court Quashes Raichur SDM Order Order VI Rule 16 CPC | Defendants Enjoy Greater Latitude In Altering Defence: Punjab & Haryana High Court Explains Doctrinal Leeway Under CPC Boarding Running Train Not Self-Inflicted Injury: Delhi High Court Sets Aside Order Denying Compensation Possession Of One Co-Sharer Is Possession Of All: J&K&L High Court Cannot Invoke Article 226 For Registering FIR Or Restoring Water Supply: Kerala High Court Natural Guardian's Sale Of Minor's Property Without Court Nod Is Voidable, Extinguishes If Not Challenged Within 3 Years Of Majority: Madras High Court Orissa High Court Rejects Cancer-Survivor Husband's Plea To Transfer Maintenance Case Presumption Of Correctness Of Judicial Records Not Absolute And Can Be Rebutted By Direct Evidence: Kerala High Court on Married Daughter Cannot Challenge Partition After 21-Year Slumber If She Had Knowledge: Madhya Pradesh High Court Kerala High Court Orders Immediate Suspension Of Lakshadweep CJM For Allegedly Forging Witness Deposition To Convict Accused Defect In Served Copy Of Affidavit Not Fatal: Supreme Court Restores Election Petition Challenging Lok Sabha Poll Result, Clarifies Law On Form-25 Attestation

High Court Grants Bail in NDPS Case Citing Right to Speedy Trial

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


 In a significant ruling, the Punjab-Haryana High Court today granted regular bail to Mahan Paswan, alias Makhan, in a case involving drug trafficking charges. The decision, pronounced by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Moudgil, underscored the right to a speedy trial as a fundamental aspect of justice.

Observation by the Court: The court observed, "No useful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner behind bars for an indefinite period," referencing the petitioner's prolonged custody of over two years without substantial progress in the trial.

Background of the Case: Paswan was implicated in an FIR dated October 5, 2021, under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act), involving the recovery of 80 Kg and 250 grams of Ganja. The defense highlighted alleged procedural lapses in the investigation, particularly non-compliance with Section 42 of the NDPS Act, which mandates proper recording and reporting of information in drug seizure cases.

Court's Reasoning: Emphasizing the principles enshrined in the Constitution of India, the court observed that the right to a speedy trial is paramount. The court's decision also factored in the slow pace of the trial, as only 3 out of 17 prosecution witnesses had been examined since the charges were framed.

Impact of the Ruling: This ruling is significant in its reinforcement of procedural requirements under the NDPS Act and the constitutional right to a speedy trial. It sets a precedent in cases where delays in the judicial process and potential procedural lapses can impact the rights of the accused.

Future Implications: The decision is expected to influence future bail applications under the NDPS Act, particularly in cases where extended periods of custody and slow trial processes are involved.

Legal Representation: The petitioner was represented by advocate Mr. SPS Khaira, while the respondent, the State of Punjab, was represented by Mr. Rajiv Verma, DAG Punjab.

Date of Decision: 22 December 2023

MAKHAN PASWAN @ MAKHAN VS STATE OF PUNJAB   

 

Latest Legal News