Even 1.5 Years in Jail Doesn’t Dilute Section 37 NDPS Rigour: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Bail in 710 Kg Poppy Husk Case Stay of Conviction Nullifies Disqualification Under Section 8(3) RP Act: Allahabad High Court Dismisses Quo Warranto Against Rahul Gandhi Custodial Interrogation Necessary to Uncover ₹2 Crore MGNREGA Scam: Kerala High Court Rejects Anticipatory Bail for Vendors in Corruption Case Order 41 Rule 23 CPC | Trial Court Cannot Decide Title Solely on a Vacated Judgment: Himachal Pradesh High Court Strikes By Bar Associations Cannot Stall Justice: Allahabad High Court Holds Office Bearers Liable for Contempt if Revenue Suits Are Delayed Due to Boycotts To Constitute a Service PE, Services Must Be Furnished Within India Through Employees Present in India: Delhi High Court Medical Negligence | State Liable for Loss of Vision in Botched Cataract Surgeries: Gauhati High Court Awards Compensation Waiver of Right Under Section 50 NDPS is Valid Even Without Panch Signatures: Bombay High Court Agricultural Land Is 'Property' Under Hindu Women’s Right to Property Act, 1937: A.P. High Court Tenant Who Pays Rent After Verifying Landlord’s Will Cannot Dispute His Title Under Section 116 Evidence Act: Himachal Pradesh High Court Dismisses Eviction Challenge by HP State Cooperative Bank Clever Drafting Cannot Override Limitation Bar: Gujarat High Court Rejects Suit for Specific Performance Once Divorce by Mutual Consent Is Final, Wife Cannot Pursue Criminal Case for Stridhan Without Reserving Right to Do So: Himachal Pradesh High Court Caste-Based Insults Must Show Intent – Mere Abuse Not Enough for Atrocities Act: Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal Failure to Inform Detenu of Right to Represent to Detaining Authority Vitiates NSA Detention: Gauhati High Court Awarding Further Interest On Penal Charges Is Contrary To Fundamental Policy Of Indian Arbitration Law: Bombay High Court

High Court Grants Bail in NDPS Case Citing Right to Speedy Trial

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


 In a significant ruling, the Punjab-Haryana High Court today granted regular bail to Mahan Paswan, alias Makhan, in a case involving drug trafficking charges. The decision, pronounced by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Moudgil, underscored the right to a speedy trial as a fundamental aspect of justice.

Observation by the Court: The court observed, "No useful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner behind bars for an indefinite period," referencing the petitioner's prolonged custody of over two years without substantial progress in the trial.

Background of the Case: Paswan was implicated in an FIR dated October 5, 2021, under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act), involving the recovery of 80 Kg and 250 grams of Ganja. The defense highlighted alleged procedural lapses in the investigation, particularly non-compliance with Section 42 of the NDPS Act, which mandates proper recording and reporting of information in drug seizure cases.

Court's Reasoning: Emphasizing the principles enshrined in the Constitution of India, the court observed that the right to a speedy trial is paramount. The court's decision also factored in the slow pace of the trial, as only 3 out of 17 prosecution witnesses had been examined since the charges were framed.

Impact of the Ruling: This ruling is significant in its reinforcement of procedural requirements under the NDPS Act and the constitutional right to a speedy trial. It sets a precedent in cases where delays in the judicial process and potential procedural lapses can impact the rights of the accused.

Future Implications: The decision is expected to influence future bail applications under the NDPS Act, particularly in cases where extended periods of custody and slow trial processes are involved.

Legal Representation: The petitioner was represented by advocate Mr. SPS Khaira, while the respondent, the State of Punjab, was represented by Mr. Rajiv Verma, DAG Punjab.

Date of Decision: 22 December 2023

MAKHAN PASWAN @ MAKHAN VS STATE OF PUNJAB   

 

Latest Legal News