Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute Properties Acquired By Gift During Marriage Remain Separate Property Of Spouse Under French Civil Code; Husband Entitled To Half Share Only In Community Assets: Madras High Court Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Closure Of Human Trafficking Complaint, Flags Lack Of Bona Fides Access To Justice Cannot Be Denied When Tribunal Is Not Functioning': Calcutta High Court Holds Writ Maintainable Under Article 226 Amid Stalled Conciliation Proceedings Violation Of Natural Justice Overrides Bar On Maintainability Under Section 18 MSMED Act: Orissa High Court Panic In A Train Does Not Mean Self-Destruction: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants ₹8 Lakh Compensation For Passenger's Death In Stampede Section 101 JJ Act | Date Of Knowledge Of Order, Not Mere Knowledge Of Disposal, Commences Limitation Period: Delhi High Court Telangana High Court Quashes Order Declaring Inam Land As Govt Property Without Determining Occupancy Rights Proviso To Section 125(3) CrPC Does Not Limit Enforcement Of Monetary Relief Orders Under Section 20 DV Act: Telangana High Court Regularization Of Deviation Within Permissible Plot Envelope Governed By Uniform Fee Schedule, Arbitrary 5X Penalty Unsustainable: J&K&L High Court Man Who Blackmailed Woman With Her Own Nude Photos To Rape Her Repeatedly Can't Escape Conviction Merely Because His Voice Sample Wasn't Taken: Delhi High Court Arbitration Clause In Sale Agreement Cannot Be Invoked If Subject Matter Involves Third-Party Title Disputes: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Errs In Dismissing Amendment Plea If New Facts Emerge From Written Statement: Punjab & Haryana High Court 'No Compensation For Own Wrong': Gujarat High Court Rules Tortfeasors & Legal Heirs Cannot Claim Motor Accident Damages Under Section 166 MV Act Allahabad High Court Pulls Up Police And Magistrates Over Illegal Remand Of Juvenile Accused Section 13(1)(ia) & (ib) Hindu Marriage Act | Spouse Seeking Divorce On Grounds Of Cruelty And Desertion Must Prove Allegations With Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Cannot Let Land Become Banjar: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Appointment Of Receiver Under BNSS Amidst Pending Civil Title Disputes Section 8 Arbitration Act | Executing Court Must Refer Parties To Arbitration If Dispute Falls Within Scope Of Compromise Decree: Madhya Pradesh High Court Suit For Damages Arising Out Of Tortious Injury Barred By Limitation If Not Filed Within One Year: Punjab & Haryana High Court 72-Hour Gap Not Proximate: Calcutta High Court Quashes Murder Conviction, Holds 'Last Seen' Theory Inapplicable When Time Gap Is Wide Original Owner Cannot Create Trust Over Property Already Sold; Separate Relief For Title Declaration Not Required: Madras High Court

High Court Dissolves M/s Amrit Worldwide Ltd., Citing ‘Complete Winding Up of Affairs’

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court has ordered the dissolution of M/s Amrit Worldwide Ltd., a move that brings an end to a prolonged winding-up process that began back in 2000. Justice Dharmesh Sharma presided over the case and passed the judgment on November 23, 2023, underlining the inability of the company to procure any assets for liquidation or realization.

The Official Liquidator, appointed since 17th May 2000, filed an application under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956, highlighting the fruitlessness of the winding-up process. The company was initially ordered to wind up on 10th August 2004, but since then, no substantial progress had been made in realizing assets to satisfy the company’s creditors.

The Court also took Into consideration a prior application under Sections 542 & 543 of the Act, aimed at holding the ex-directors personally liable. However, this application was dismissed earlier this year, on 21st February 2023, due to the demise of the concerned ex-directors and the absence of actionable claims.

Justice Dharmesh Sharma’s observation was pivotal in the verdict. The judge noted, “When the affairs of a company have been completely wound up or when the Court is of the opinion that the liquidator cannot proceed with the winding up of a company for want of funds and assets or for any other reason whatsoever, an order of dissolution of the company should be made.” This statement formed the backbone of the court’s decision to dissolve the company.

The ruling also referenced the principles laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Meghal Homes(P) Ltd. V. Shree Niwas Girni K.K. Samiti & Ors., underscoring the finality of the dissolution process in cases where a company’s affairs have been fully wound up or when continuation is deemed impractical.

Date of Decision: 23 November 2023

IB & W COMMUNICATION P. LTD. VS M/S AMRIT WORLD WIDE LTD.

Latest Legal News