Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) Is Not a Ritualistic Phrase — Plaintiff Must Prove It With Substance, Not Just Words: Karnataka High Court FIR in Disproportionate Assets Case Quashed: Patna High Court Slams SP for 'Non-Application of Mind' and 'Absence of Credible Source Information' Ownership of Vehicle Linked to Commercial Quantity of Heroin – Custodial Interrogation Necessary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 BNSS Death Caused by Rash Driving Is Not a Private Dispute — No FIR Quashing on Basis of Compromise in Section 106 BNS Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court No Bank Can Override Court Orders: Rajasthan High Court Slams Axis Bank for Unauthorized Withdrawal from Court-Ordered FD" Indian Courts Cannot Invalidate Foreign Arbitral Awards Passed Under Foreign Law: Madhya Pradesh High Court Enforces Texas-Based Award Despite Commercial Court’s Contrary Decree Sudden Quarrel over Mound of Earth — Not Murder but Culpable Homicide: Allahabad High Court Bar Under Order II Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Invoked Where Specific Performance Was Legally Premature Due To Statutory Impediments: P&H High Court Calling Wife by Her Caste Name in Public Just Before Suicide is Immediate Cause of Self-Immolation: Madras High Court Upholds Husband’s Conviction Under Section 306 IPC No Work No Pay Is Not a Universal Rule: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dock Identification Without Prior TIP Is Absolutely Useless: P&H High Court Upholds Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case Filing Forged Court Pleadings in Union Government’s Name is Criminal Contempt: Karnataka High Court Sentences Litigant to Jail Execution of Will Proved, But Probate Justly Denied Due to Concealment of Property Sale: Delhi High Court Mere Designation Doesn’t Establish Criminal Liability: Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings Against ICICI Officials in Octroi Evasion Case Fraud on Power Voids the Order: Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Karnataka BJP Leader R. Ashoka, Slams Politically Motivated Prosecution Cause of Fire Is Immaterial If Fire Itself Is Insured Peril: Supreme Court Rebukes Insurer’s Repudiation Dragging a Trained Army Officer Up 20 Steps Without Resistance? The Story Lacks Credence: Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Army Officer’s Murder Semen Stains Alone Do Not Prove Rape: Supreme Court Acquits Doctor Accused of Rape No Mortgage, No SARFAESI: Supreme Court Rules Against NEDFi, Says Recovery Action in Nagaland Without Security Agreement Was Illegal Parity Cannot Be Denied by Geography: Supreme Court Holds Jharkhand Bound by Patna HC's Judgment, Orders Pay Revision for Industries Officer Once Power Flows Continuously from a Synchronized Turbine, It Is No Longer Infirm: Supreme Court Orders TANGEDCO to Pay Fixed Charges to Penna Electricity

High Court Dissolves M/s Amrit Worldwide Ltd., Citing ‘Complete Winding Up of Affairs’

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court has ordered the dissolution of M/s Amrit Worldwide Ltd., a move that brings an end to a prolonged winding-up process that began back in 2000. Justice Dharmesh Sharma presided over the case and passed the judgment on November 23, 2023, underlining the inability of the company to procure any assets for liquidation or realization.

The Official Liquidator, appointed since 17th May 2000, filed an application under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956, highlighting the fruitlessness of the winding-up process. The company was initially ordered to wind up on 10th August 2004, but since then, no substantial progress had been made in realizing assets to satisfy the company’s creditors.

The Court also took Into consideration a prior application under Sections 542 & 543 of the Act, aimed at holding the ex-directors personally liable. However, this application was dismissed earlier this year, on 21st February 2023, due to the demise of the concerned ex-directors and the absence of actionable claims.

Justice Dharmesh Sharma’s observation was pivotal in the verdict. The judge noted, “When the affairs of a company have been completely wound up or when the Court is of the opinion that the liquidator cannot proceed with the winding up of a company for want of funds and assets or for any other reason whatsoever, an order of dissolution of the company should be made.” This statement formed the backbone of the court’s decision to dissolve the company.

The ruling also referenced the principles laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Meghal Homes(P) Ltd. V. Shree Niwas Girni K.K. Samiti & Ors., underscoring the finality of the dissolution process in cases where a company’s affairs have been fully wound up or when continuation is deemed impractical.

Date of Decision: 23 November 2023

IB & W COMMUNICATION P. LTD. VS M/S AMRIT WORLD WIDE LTD.

Latest Legal News