Magistrate's Direction for Police Inquiry Under Section 202 CrPC Is Valid; Petitioner Must Await Investigation Outcome: Bombay High Court Dismisses Advocate's Petition as Premature    |     Tribunal’s Compensation Exceeding Claimed Amount Found Just and Fair Under Motor Vehicles Act: No Deduction Errors Warrant Reduction: Gujrat High Court    |     When Two Accused Face Identical Charges, One Cannot Be Convicted While the Other is Acquitted: Supreme Court Emphasizes Principle of Parity in Acquittal    |     Supreme Court Limits Interim Protection for Financial Institutions, Modifies Order on FIRs Filed by Borrowers    |     Kerala High Court Grants Regular Bail in Methamphetamine Case After Delay in Chemical Analysis Report    |     No Sign of Recent Intercourse; No Injury Was Found On Her Body Or Private Parts: Gauhati High Court Acquits Two In Gang Rape Case    |     Failure to Disclose Relationship with Key Stakeholder Led to Setting Aside of Arbitral Award: Gujarat High Court    |     Strict Compliance with UAPA's 7-Day Timeline for Sanctions is Essential:  Supreme Court    |     PAT Teachers Entitled to Regularization from 2014, Quashes Prospective Regularization as Arbitrary: Himachal Pradesh High Court    |     Punjab and Haryana High Court Upholds Anonymity Protections for Victims in Sensitive Cases: Right to Privacy Prevails Over Right to Information    |     Certified Copy of Will Admissible Under Registration Act, 1908: Allahabad HC Dismisses Plea for Production of Original Will    |     Injuries on Non-Vital Parts Do Not Warrant Conviction for Attempt to Murder: Madhya Pradesh High Court Modifies Conviction Under Section 307 IPC to Section 326 IPC    |     Classification Based on Wikipedia Data Inadmissible; Tribunal to Reassess Using Actual Financial Records: PH High Court Orders Reconsideration of Wage Dispute    |     Mere Delay in Initiation Does Not Justify Reduction of Damages: Jharkhand High Court on Provident Fund Defaults    |     Legatee Can Continue Suit Without Probate, But Decree Contingent on Probate Approval: Orissa High Court    |     An Award that Shocks the Conscience of the Court Cannot Stand, Especially When Public Money is Involved: Calcutta HC Reduces Quantum by Half    |     Trademark Transaction Within Territoriality Principle Subject to Indian Tax Laws: Bombay High Court Dismisses Hindustan Unilever's Petition on Non-Deduction of TDS    |     Concealment of Material Facts Bars Relief under Article 226: SC Reprimands Petitioners for Lack of Bonafides    |     Without Determination of the Will's Genuineness, Partition is Impossible: Supreme Court on Liberal Approach to Pleading Amendments    |     Candidates Cannot Challenge a Selection Process After Participating Without Protest : Delhi High Court Upholds ISRO's Administrative Officer Recruitment    |     Invalid Bank Guarantee Invocation Found Fatal to Recovery Claim: Delhi High Court Dismisses GAIL’s Appeal    |     Adverse Remarks in APAR Recorded Without Objectivity and Likely Motivated by Bias: Delhi High Court Quashes Biased APAR Downgrade of CRPF Officer    |    

High Court Dissolves M/s Amrit Worldwide Ltd., Citing ‘Complete Winding Up of Affairs’

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court has ordered the dissolution of M/s Amrit Worldwide Ltd., a move that brings an end to a prolonged winding-up process that began back in 2000. Justice Dharmesh Sharma presided over the case and passed the judgment on November 23, 2023, underlining the inability of the company to procure any assets for liquidation or realization.

The Official Liquidator, appointed since 17th May 2000, filed an application under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956, highlighting the fruitlessness of the winding-up process. The company was initially ordered to wind up on 10th August 2004, but since then, no substantial progress had been made in realizing assets to satisfy the company’s creditors.

The Court also took Into consideration a prior application under Sections 542 & 543 of the Act, aimed at holding the ex-directors personally liable. However, this application was dismissed earlier this year, on 21st February 2023, due to the demise of the concerned ex-directors and the absence of actionable claims.

Justice Dharmesh Sharma’s observation was pivotal in the verdict. The judge noted, “When the affairs of a company have been completely wound up or when the Court is of the opinion that the liquidator cannot proceed with the winding up of a company for want of funds and assets or for any other reason whatsoever, an order of dissolution of the company should be made.” This statement formed the backbone of the court’s decision to dissolve the company.

The ruling also referenced the principles laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Meghal Homes(P) Ltd. V. Shree Niwas Girni K.K. Samiti & Ors., underscoring the finality of the dissolution process in cases where a company’s affairs have been fully wound up or when continuation is deemed impractical.

Date of Decision: 23 November 2023

IB & W COMMUNICATION P. LTD. VS M/S AMRIT WORLD WIDE LTD.

Similar News