UDCPR | Municipal Authorities Empowered To Grant Relaxation For Recreational Open Spaces In Redevelopment Projects: Bombay High Court Appellate Court Can Enhance Compensation Under Motor Vehicles Act Even Without Cross-Appeal By Claimants: Allahabad High Court State Instrumentalities Cannot Supplement Reasons For Withholding Public Money Via Affidavits Years Later: Calcutta High Court Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act | Victim's Status As 'Illegal Immigrant' Does Not Dilute Offence Or Shield Perpetrator: Bombay High Court Clubbing Of Criminal Trials | No Basis To Direct Consolidation If Connected Proceedings Have Already Concluded: Delhi High Court IBC ‘Clean Slate’ Principle Cannot Extinguish Pre-existing Crystallized Liability Under Labour Awards: Bombay High Court Section 406 IPC | 'Donation' Does Not Constitute 'Entrustment'; Criminal Prosecution Quashed In Absence Of Aggrieved Victim: Delhi High Court Failure To Deliver Possession Of Plot Constitutes "Continuous Wrong" Giving Rise To Recurrent Cause Of Action Under Consumer Protection Act: Delhi State Commission High Court Cannot Entertain Writ Petition Under Article 226 When Statutory Appellate Remedy Under Section 107 CGST Act Is Available: Gujarat High Court Appointment Of Temple Servants Is The Exclusive Prerogative Of The Hereditary Trustee: Kerala High Court Stay Of Suit Proceedings Under CPC Does Not Automatically Bar Adjudication Of Pending Temporary Injunction Application: Rajasthan High Court Section 136A MV Act | Supreme Court Directs States To Impound Vehicles With Unpaid E-Challans And Mandates Electronic Enforcement Compliance Section 115 CPC | Executing Court Cannot Dismiss Execution Petition On Hyper-Technical Grounds Regarding LRs Of Judgment Debtor: Himachal Pradesh High Court Succession Act | Will Not Validly Executed If Attesting Witness Admits Signing Without Witnessing Testator’s Signature: Madras High Court High Court Cannot Interfere Under Article 227 To Correct Errors Of Fact Or Act As An Appellate Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court Advocates Act 1961 | Bar Council Has No Power To Suspend Advocate Pending Disciplinary Enquiry: Allahabad High Court Identification Of Accused By Police Personnel In Pitch Darkness Without Prior Acquaintance Is Unreliable: Himachal Pradesh High Court Body Shaming Or Insulting Physical Appearance Does Not Per Se Constitute Offence Under Section 509 IPC: Karnataka High Court Drishyam 3 | Interim Injunction To Restrain Film Release Cannot Be Granted Without Establishing Clear Subsisting Legal Right: Madras High Court Town Planning Scheme | Statutory Notice To Occupiers Under Rule 12(2)(a) Punjab Municipal Rules Is Mandatory And Independent Of Notice To Owner: Punjab & Haryana High Court

High Court Directs Rigorous Probe into Allegations of Over-Invoicing in Power Projects by Top Corporates Adani and Essar

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant move towards ensuring transparency and accountability in the power sector, the High Court of Delhi has disposed of two public interest litigations (PILs), directing the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) and the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to conduct meticulous and expeditious investigations into allegations of over-invoicing by major corporate groups in the power projects.

The PILs, filed by the Centre for Public Interest Litigation and others, highlighted concerns over alleged over-invoicing in coal imports and equipment by companies within the Adani and Essar Groups. These practices, the petitioners claimed, led to inflated power tariffs and the illegal siphoning of funds.

In their judgment, the Hon’ble Mr. Justice Suresh Kumar Kait and Hon’ble Ms. Justice Neena Bansal Krishna observed, “In the peculiar facts of these cases, this Court finds it appropriate to direct the respondents to meticulously and expeditiously look into the allegations of the petitioners to unearth the actual factual position and take appropriate actions against the erring companies, if any, as per law.” This directive underscores the court’s commitment to unearthing the truth and ensuring justice in the face of complex financial allegations.

The DRI and CBI have been actively Investigating these allegations, issuing several Show Cause Notices and seeking international assistance through Letters Rogatory. The involvement of multiple companies and the complexity of transactions across different jurisdictions have made the investigation challenging.

The Ministry of Power, in its response, stated that power tariffs are determined through transparent processes, unaffected by the alleged inflated costs of projects. However, the court’s directive highlights the need for a deeper investigation into these claims to safeguard public interest and consumer rights.

This decision marks a crucial step in addressing concerns over corporate governance and financial ethics in India’s power sector. The outcome of these investigations is eagerly awaited, as it could have significant implications for the industry and its regulatory framework.

With the High Court’s directive, the DRI and CBI are expected to intensify their investigative efforts, bringing clarity and justice to a matter of significant public concern.

Date of Decision: 19th December 2023

CENTRE FOR PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION  AND ANR. VS  UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

 

Latest Legal News