Safety Shoes Used as Weapon Meets Mens Rea Requirement for Murder: Rajasthan HC on Bail Denial    |     Right to Be Considered for Promotion, Not a Right to Promotion: Supreme Court Clarifies Eligibility for Retrospective Promotion    |     Inherent Power of Courts Can Recall Admission of Insufficiently Stamped Documents: Supreme Court    |     Courts Cannot Substitute Their Opinion for Security Agencies in Threat Perception Assessments: J&K High Court Directs Reassessment of Political Leader's Threat Perception    |     Service Law | Violation of Natural Justice: Discharge Without Notice or Reason: Gauhati High Court Orders Reinstatement and Regularization of Circle Organizers    |     Jharkhand High Court Quashes Family Court Order, Reaffirms Jurisdiction Based on Minor’s Ordinary Residence in Delhi    |     Ex-Serviceman Status Ceases After First Employment in Government Job: Calcutta High Court Upholds SBI’s Cancellation of Ex-Serviceman's Appointment Over False Declaration of Employment    |     Maxim Res Ipsa Loquitur Applies When State Instrumentalities Are Directly Responsible: Delhi High Court Orders MCD to Pay ₹10 Lakhs Compensation for Death    |     Wilful Avoidance of Service Must Be Established Before Passing Ex Parte Order Under Section 126(2) CrPC: Patna High Court Sets Aside Ex Parte Maintenance Order    |     MP High Court Imposes Rs. 10,000 Costs for Prolonging Litigation, Upholds Eviction of Petitioners from Father's Property    |     When Detention Unnecessary Despite Serious Allegations of Fraud Bail Should be Granted: Kerala HC    |     Magistrate's Direction for Police Inquiry Under Section 202 CrPC Is Valid; Petitioner Must Await Investigation Outcome: Bombay High Court Dismisses Advocate's Petition as Premature    |     Relocation Alone Cannot Justify Transfer: Supreme Court Rejects Plea to Move Case from Nellore to Delhi, Orders Fresh Probe    |    

High Court Directs Rigorous Probe into Allegations of Over-Invoicing in Power Projects by Top Corporates Adani and Essar

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant move towards ensuring transparency and accountability in the power sector, the High Court of Delhi has disposed of two public interest litigations (PILs), directing the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) and the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to conduct meticulous and expeditious investigations into allegations of over-invoicing by major corporate groups in the power projects.

The PILs, filed by the Centre for Public Interest Litigation and others, highlighted concerns over alleged over-invoicing in coal imports and equipment by companies within the Adani and Essar Groups. These practices, the petitioners claimed, led to inflated power tariffs and the illegal siphoning of funds.

In their judgment, the Hon’ble Mr. Justice Suresh Kumar Kait and Hon’ble Ms. Justice Neena Bansal Krishna observed, “In the peculiar facts of these cases, this Court finds it appropriate to direct the respondents to meticulously and expeditiously look into the allegations of the petitioners to unearth the actual factual position and take appropriate actions against the erring companies, if any, as per law.” This directive underscores the court’s commitment to unearthing the truth and ensuring justice in the face of complex financial allegations.

The DRI and CBI have been actively Investigating these allegations, issuing several Show Cause Notices and seeking international assistance through Letters Rogatory. The involvement of multiple companies and the complexity of transactions across different jurisdictions have made the investigation challenging.

The Ministry of Power, in its response, stated that power tariffs are determined through transparent processes, unaffected by the alleged inflated costs of projects. However, the court’s directive highlights the need for a deeper investigation into these claims to safeguard public interest and consumer rights.

This decision marks a crucial step in addressing concerns over corporate governance and financial ethics in India’s power sector. The outcome of these investigations is eagerly awaited, as it could have significant implications for the industry and its regulatory framework.

With the High Court’s directive, the DRI and CBI are expected to intensify their investigative efforts, bringing clarity and justice to a matter of significant public concern.

Date of Decision: 19th December 2023

CENTRE FOR PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION  AND ANR. VS  UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

 

Similar News