Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

"High Court Affirms Continuation of Trial Despite Lost Cheque: 'No Ground for Dismissal or Adjournment' - Punjab and Haryana High Court"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has dismissed a petition filed by PG Micro System Private Ltd., seeking to quash orders passed by lower courts in a cheque dishonour case against Softech Computers. The High Court, presided over by Justice Deepak Gupta, upheld the decisions of the Judicial Magistrate and the Additional Sessions Judge, Gurugram, emphasizing that the loss of the original cheque in transit is not a valid ground for dismissing the complaint or adjourning the matter sine die.

The case, CRM-M No. 62122 of 2023, decided on December 15, 2023, revolved around the dishonour of a cheque worth Rs. 28,00,092, allegedly issued by the petitioner, PG Micro System Private Ltd. The petitioner contended that the cheque was not issued by them, supporting their claim with forensic evidence. However, a significant twist occurred when the original cheque was lost in transit before forensic examination by RFSL, Bhondsi, Gurugram.

In his judgment, Justice Gupta stated, "What will be the consequences of non-availability of the original cheque in the light of the afore-said circumstances, is to be appreciated by the trial Court, at the time of conclusion of trial." He further added, "However, for the simple reason that cheque in question has been lost during transit, cannot be a ground either to dismiss the complaint or to adjourn the matter sine die."

The High Court's observation clarified that the trial should proceed with the reconstructed documents and the photographs of the cheque available with RFSL. The court also noted that the cheque was dishonored with the remark 'Payment Stopped by Drawer', not due to a signature mismatch, which was a central issue in the petitioner's defense.

This decision sets a precedent in cases where crucial evidence is lost or compromised during legal proceedings. The High Court's ruling highlights the importance of the continuity of the trial process and the assessment of available evidence, reinforcing the principles of justice and due process.

The case now returns to the trial court for further proceedings, with both parties preparing to present their arguments based on the reconstructed evidence and available records.

Decided on : 15-12-2023

PG MICRO SYSTEM PRIVATE LTD. Vs. SOFTECH COMPUTERS

 

Latest Legal News