Electricity Act 2003 | Section 56(2) Does Not Preclude Licensee From Raising Supplementary Demand After Two Years; Only Restricts Right To Disconnect: Supreme Court Dissolution Of Partnership At Will | Outgoing Partner Entitled To Market Value Of Assets As On Date Of Distribution, Not Date Of Dissolution: Supreme Court SEBI | Release Of Escrow Under Buyback Regulations Does Not Preclude Independent Inquiry Into Fraud Under PFUTP Regulations: Supreme Court Promotion Based On Merit Does Not Wipe Out Past Adverse Records But Must Be Balanced In FR 56(j) Compulsory Retirement: Supreme Court Appellate Court Can Convict For Offence Even If Charge Not Framed By Trial Court Under Section 464 CrPC: Supreme Court Extradition | Sovereign Assurance Does Not Override Judicial Sentencing; Cannot Be Used To Artificially Accelerate Sentence Completion: Supreme Court Article 21 | State Has A Positive Duty To Protect Public Health By Implementing Front-Of-Package Labelling Regulations: Supreme Court Revenue Entries Are Not Documents Of Title, Cannot Replace Substantive Evidence In Property Disputes: Supreme Court Long Possession Without Hostile Animus Does Not Amount To Adverse Possession: Supreme Court Administrative Discretion Must Comply With Article 14; Subsequent Executive Decisions Cannot Retroactively Cure Failure Of Timely Performance: Supreme Court Municipal Corporation Cannot Unilaterally Downgrade Market Value Of Land Acquired For Road Widening To Deny TDR Certificates: Andhra Pradesh High Court Execution Of Agreement To Sell Does Not Automatically Terminate Existing Tenancy: Allahabad High Court Writ Jurisdiction Not Maintainable When Title To Property Is Under A Cloud And Subject Matter Of Disputed Facts: Andhra Pradesh High Court Amendment Of Plaint Seeking Impleadment Of Third Parties And Addition Of Time-Barred Claims In A Partition Suit Cannot Be Permitted: Bombay High Court Reassessment Order Does Not Result In Merger Of Original Assessment Order If Issues Are Distinct: Andhra Pradesh High Court GST Assessment Order Uploaded Only Under 'Additional Notices' Tab Without Separate Intimation Violates Principles Of Natural Justice: Calcutta High Court 'Prolonged Inaction' Cannot Be Rewarded: Delhi High Court Upholds CESTAT Refusal To Condone 968-Day Delay In Filing Customs Appeal Probate No Longer Mandatory To Establish Rights Under A Will Following 2025 Amendment To Indian Succession Act: J&K High Court Review Jurisdiction Cannot Be Used To Introduce New Factual Foundations Or Reopen Concluded Arbitral Awards: Karnataka High Court High Court Cannot Invoke Article 227 To Strike Off Plaint When Statutory Remedy Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC Is Available: Madras High Court Section 58 BNSS | Detention Beyond 24 Hours Without Magistrate’s Authority Vitiates Arrest And Subsequent Remand: Orissa High Court Arbitrator Is The Sole Judge Of Quality And Quantity Of Evidence, Court Cannot Act As Court Of Appeal: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 5 Limitation Act | Court Cannot Condone Delay In A Mechanical Manner Without Ascertaining Bona Fides Of The Applicant: Calcutta High Court High Court Cannot Quash FIR Under Section 482 CrPC By Conducting Mini-Trial On Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court Taxation Law | Mere Assertion Of Natural Justice Violation On Disputed Facts Won't Bypass Statutory Appeal: Delhi High Court

"High Court Affirms Continuation of Trial Despite Lost Cheque: 'No Ground for Dismissal or Adjournment' - Punjab and Haryana High Court"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has dismissed a petition filed by PG Micro System Private Ltd., seeking to quash orders passed by lower courts in a cheque dishonour case against Softech Computers. The High Court, presided over by Justice Deepak Gupta, upheld the decisions of the Judicial Magistrate and the Additional Sessions Judge, Gurugram, emphasizing that the loss of the original cheque in transit is not a valid ground for dismissing the complaint or adjourning the matter sine die.

The case, CRM-M No. 62122 of 2023, decided on December 15, 2023, revolved around the dishonour of a cheque worth Rs. 28,00,092, allegedly issued by the petitioner, PG Micro System Private Ltd. The petitioner contended that the cheque was not issued by them, supporting their claim with forensic evidence. However, a significant twist occurred when the original cheque was lost in transit before forensic examination by RFSL, Bhondsi, Gurugram.

In his judgment, Justice Gupta stated, "What will be the consequences of non-availability of the original cheque in the light of the afore-said circumstances, is to be appreciated by the trial Court, at the time of conclusion of trial." He further added, "However, for the simple reason that cheque in question has been lost during transit, cannot be a ground either to dismiss the complaint or to adjourn the matter sine die."

The High Court's observation clarified that the trial should proceed with the reconstructed documents and the photographs of the cheque available with RFSL. The court also noted that the cheque was dishonored with the remark 'Payment Stopped by Drawer', not due to a signature mismatch, which was a central issue in the petitioner's defense.

This decision sets a precedent in cases where crucial evidence is lost or compromised during legal proceedings. The High Court's ruling highlights the importance of the continuity of the trial process and the assessment of available evidence, reinforcing the principles of justice and due process.

The case now returns to the trial court for further proceedings, with both parties preparing to present their arguments based on the reconstructed evidence and available records.

Decided on : 15-12-2023

PG MICRO SYSTEM PRIVATE LTD. Vs. SOFTECH COMPUTERS

 

Latest Legal News