Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) Is Not a Ritualistic Phrase — Plaintiff Must Prove It With Substance, Not Just Words: Karnataka High Court FIR in Disproportionate Assets Case Quashed: Patna High Court Slams SP for 'Non-Application of Mind' and 'Absence of Credible Source Information' Ownership of Vehicle Linked to Commercial Quantity of Heroin – Custodial Interrogation Necessary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 BNSS Death Caused by Rash Driving Is Not a Private Dispute — No FIR Quashing on Basis of Compromise in Section 106 BNS Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court No Bank Can Override Court Orders: Rajasthan High Court Slams Axis Bank for Unauthorized Withdrawal from Court-Ordered FD" Indian Courts Cannot Invalidate Foreign Arbitral Awards Passed Under Foreign Law: Madhya Pradesh High Court Enforces Texas-Based Award Despite Commercial Court’s Contrary Decree Calling Wife by Her Caste Name in Public Just Before Suicide is Immediate Cause of Self-Immolation: Madras High Court Upholds Husband’s Conviction Under Section 306 IPC No Work No Pay Is Not a Universal Rule: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dock Identification Without Prior TIP Is Absolutely Useless: P&H High Court Upholds Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case Filing Forged Court Pleadings in Union Government’s Name is Criminal Contempt: Karnataka High Court Sentences Litigant to Jail Execution of Will Proved, But Probate Justly Denied Due to Concealment of Property Sale: Delhi High Court Mere Designation Doesn’t Establish Criminal Liability: Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings Against ICICI Officials in Octroi Evasion Case Fraud on Power Voids the Order: Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Karnataka BJP Leader R. Ashoka, Slams Politically Motivated Prosecution Cause of Fire Is Immaterial If Fire Itself Is Insured Peril: Supreme Court Rebukes Insurer’s Repudiation Dragging a Trained Army Officer Up 20 Steps Without Resistance? The Story Lacks Credence: Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Army Officer’s Murder Semen Stains Alone Do Not Prove Rape: Supreme Court Acquits Doctor Accused of Rape No Mortgage, No SARFAESI: Supreme Court Rules Against NEDFi, Says Recovery Action in Nagaland Without Security Agreement Was Illegal Parity Cannot Be Denied by Geography: Supreme Court Holds Jharkhand Bound by Patna HC's Judgment, Orders Pay Revision for Industries Officer Once Power Flows Continuously from a Synchronized Turbine, It Is No Longer Infirm: Supreme Court Orders TANGEDCO to Pay Fixed Charges to Penna Electricity

"High Court Affirms Continuation of Trial Despite Lost Cheque: 'No Ground for Dismissal or Adjournment' - Punjab and Haryana High Court"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has dismissed a petition filed by PG Micro System Private Ltd., seeking to quash orders passed by lower courts in a cheque dishonour case against Softech Computers. The High Court, presided over by Justice Deepak Gupta, upheld the decisions of the Judicial Magistrate and the Additional Sessions Judge, Gurugram, emphasizing that the loss of the original cheque in transit is not a valid ground for dismissing the complaint or adjourning the matter sine die.

The case, CRM-M No. 62122 of 2023, decided on December 15, 2023, revolved around the dishonour of a cheque worth Rs. 28,00,092, allegedly issued by the petitioner, PG Micro System Private Ltd. The petitioner contended that the cheque was not issued by them, supporting their claim with forensic evidence. However, a significant twist occurred when the original cheque was lost in transit before forensic examination by RFSL, Bhondsi, Gurugram.

In his judgment, Justice Gupta stated, "What will be the consequences of non-availability of the original cheque in the light of the afore-said circumstances, is to be appreciated by the trial Court, at the time of conclusion of trial." He further added, "However, for the simple reason that cheque in question has been lost during transit, cannot be a ground either to dismiss the complaint or to adjourn the matter sine die."

The High Court's observation clarified that the trial should proceed with the reconstructed documents and the photographs of the cheque available with RFSL. The court also noted that the cheque was dishonored with the remark 'Payment Stopped by Drawer', not due to a signature mismatch, which was a central issue in the petitioner's defense.

This decision sets a precedent in cases where crucial evidence is lost or compromised during legal proceedings. The High Court's ruling highlights the importance of the continuity of the trial process and the assessment of available evidence, reinforcing the principles of justice and due process.

The case now returns to the trial court for further proceedings, with both parties preparing to present their arguments based on the reconstructed evidence and available records.

Decided on : 15-12-2023

PG MICRO SYSTEM PRIVATE LTD. Vs. SOFTECH COMPUTERS

 

Latest Legal News