UDCPR | Municipal Authorities Empowered To Grant Relaxation For Recreational Open Spaces In Redevelopment Projects: Bombay High Court Appellate Court Can Enhance Compensation Under Motor Vehicles Act Even Without Cross-Appeal By Claimants: Allahabad High Court State Instrumentalities Cannot Supplement Reasons For Withholding Public Money Via Affidavits Years Later: Calcutta High Court Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act | Victim's Status As 'Illegal Immigrant' Does Not Dilute Offence Or Shield Perpetrator: Bombay High Court Clubbing Of Criminal Trials | No Basis To Direct Consolidation If Connected Proceedings Have Already Concluded: Delhi High Court IBC ‘Clean Slate’ Principle Cannot Extinguish Pre-existing Crystallized Liability Under Labour Awards: Bombay High Court Section 406 IPC | 'Donation' Does Not Constitute 'Entrustment'; Criminal Prosecution Quashed In Absence Of Aggrieved Victim: Delhi High Court Failure To Deliver Possession Of Plot Constitutes "Continuous Wrong" Giving Rise To Recurrent Cause Of Action Under Consumer Protection Act: Delhi State Commission High Court Cannot Entertain Writ Petition Under Article 226 When Statutory Appellate Remedy Under Section 107 CGST Act Is Available: Gujarat High Court Appointment Of Temple Servants Is The Exclusive Prerogative Of The Hereditary Trustee: Kerala High Court Stay Of Suit Proceedings Under CPC Does Not Automatically Bar Adjudication Of Pending Temporary Injunction Application: Rajasthan High Court Section 136A MV Act | Supreme Court Directs States To Impound Vehicles With Unpaid E-Challans And Mandates Electronic Enforcement Compliance Section 115 CPC | Executing Court Cannot Dismiss Execution Petition On Hyper-Technical Grounds Regarding LRs Of Judgment Debtor: Himachal Pradesh High Court Succession Act | Will Not Validly Executed If Attesting Witness Admits Signing Without Witnessing Testator’s Signature: Madras High Court High Court Cannot Interfere Under Article 227 To Correct Errors Of Fact Or Act As An Appellate Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court Advocates Act 1961 | Bar Council Has No Power To Suspend Advocate Pending Disciplinary Enquiry: Allahabad High Court Identification Of Accused By Police Personnel In Pitch Darkness Without Prior Acquaintance Is Unreliable: Himachal Pradesh High Court Body Shaming Or Insulting Physical Appearance Does Not Per Se Constitute Offence Under Section 509 IPC: Karnataka High Court Drishyam 3 | Interim Injunction To Restrain Film Release Cannot Be Granted Without Establishing Clear Subsisting Legal Right: Madras High Court Town Planning Scheme | Statutory Notice To Occupiers Under Rule 12(2)(a) Punjab Municipal Rules Is Mandatory And Independent Of Notice To Owner: Punjab & Haryana High Court

"High Court Affirms Continuation of Trial Despite Lost Cheque: 'No Ground for Dismissal or Adjournment' - Punjab and Haryana High Court"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has dismissed a petition filed by PG Micro System Private Ltd., seeking to quash orders passed by lower courts in a cheque dishonour case against Softech Computers. The High Court, presided over by Justice Deepak Gupta, upheld the decisions of the Judicial Magistrate and the Additional Sessions Judge, Gurugram, emphasizing that the loss of the original cheque in transit is not a valid ground for dismissing the complaint or adjourning the matter sine die.

The case, CRM-M No. 62122 of 2023, decided on December 15, 2023, revolved around the dishonour of a cheque worth Rs. 28,00,092, allegedly issued by the petitioner, PG Micro System Private Ltd. The petitioner contended that the cheque was not issued by them, supporting their claim with forensic evidence. However, a significant twist occurred when the original cheque was lost in transit before forensic examination by RFSL, Bhondsi, Gurugram.

In his judgment, Justice Gupta stated, "What will be the consequences of non-availability of the original cheque in the light of the afore-said circumstances, is to be appreciated by the trial Court, at the time of conclusion of trial." He further added, "However, for the simple reason that cheque in question has been lost during transit, cannot be a ground either to dismiss the complaint or to adjourn the matter sine die."

The High Court's observation clarified that the trial should proceed with the reconstructed documents and the photographs of the cheque available with RFSL. The court also noted that the cheque was dishonored with the remark 'Payment Stopped by Drawer', not due to a signature mismatch, which was a central issue in the petitioner's defense.

This decision sets a precedent in cases where crucial evidence is lost or compromised during legal proceedings. The High Court's ruling highlights the importance of the continuity of the trial process and the assessment of available evidence, reinforcing the principles of justice and due process.

The case now returns to the trial court for further proceedings, with both parties preparing to present their arguments based on the reconstructed evidence and available records.

Decided on : 15-12-2023

PG MICRO SYSTEM PRIVATE LTD. Vs. SOFTECH COMPUTERS

 

Latest Legal News