Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness 304 Part I IPC | Sudden Fight Between Brothers Over Mud House Construction: Jharkhand High Court Converts Murder Conviction To Culpable Homicide When Rape Fails, Section 450 Cannot Stand: Orissa High Court Acquits Accused of House-Trespass After Finding Relationship Consensual Concurrent Eviction Orders Will Not Be Reopened Under Article 227: Madras High Court Section 128 Contract Act | Surety’s Liability Is Co-Extensive: Kerala High Court Upholds Recovery from Guarantors’ Salary Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Offences Are Not Punishable With Death or Life: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Deputy Tahsildar in Land Records Case Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Consumer | No Complete Deficiency In Service — Excess Rainfall Also To Blame: Supreme Court Halves Compensation In Groundnut Seed Crop Failure Case Development Cannot Override The Master Plan: Supreme Court Nullifies Cement Unit CLU In Agricultural Zone Negative Viscera Report Is Not a Passport to Acquittal: Madras High Court Confirms Life Term of Parents for Poisoning Mentally Retarded Daughter Observations Have Had a Demoralising and Chilling Effect: Allahabad High Court Judge Recuses from Bail Matter After Supreme Court’s Strong Remarks Controversial YouTube Remarks On ‘Black Magic Village’ Not A Crime: Gauhati High Court Quashes FIR Against Abhishek Kar “Failure To Specifically Deny Allegations Amounts To Admission”: J&K High Court Reiterates Law Under Order VIII CPC

Harassment for Dowry Culminates in Tragedy: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Ten-Year Imprisonment in Dowry Death Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment addressing the grave issue of dowry deaths, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh has upheld the ten-year rigorous imprisonment of Kondru Israel for the dowry death of his wife. The verdict, pronounced on 1st February 2024 by Justice A.V. Ravindra Babu, reaffirmed the legal stance against the dowry menace.

The case, registered as Criminal Appeal No.1509 of 2010, revolved around the appellant Kondru Israel, who was convicted under Section 304-B of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for the harassment and subsequent death of his wife.

Justice Ravindra Babu, in his judgment, noted, "The death of the deceased was otherwise than in normal circumstances," highlighting the harrowing conditions leading to the victim's suicide. This observation was crucial in understanding the nature of the crime.

The court meticulously examined the testimonies of various witnesses, including the mother (PW1) and neighbors (PW4, PW6) of the deceased. Their accounts established a pattern of continuous harassment linked to the demand for unpaid dowry, a critical factor leading to the tragic demise of the appellant's wife.

In a noteworthy observation, the court stated, "The evidence of P.W.1 to P.W.3 categorically proves the fact that soon before death the deceased was subjected to harassment in connection with a demand for dowry." This statement underlined the direct correlation between the harassment and the victim's death.

The appellant's defense, which claimed the deceased's ill health led to her suicide, was found to be unsubstantiated. The court remarked, "No medical evidence provided to support claim – Defence considered an afterthought."

The judgment also emphasized the application of Section 113-B of the Indian Evidence Act, which deals with the presumption as to dowry death. The court determined that the proximity of harassment to the death of the deceased categorized the incident as a 'dowry death.'

Concluding the case, the High Court directed the appellant to surrender before the trial court, thereby confirming the sentence of ten years of rigorous imprisonment initially imposed by the III Additional District & Sessions Judge, Kakinada.

Date of Decision: 1st February 2024

Kondru Israel vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

 

Latest Legal News