Cruelty Need Not Be Physical: Mental Agony and Emotional Distress Are Sufficient Grounds for Divorce: Supreme Court Section 195 Cr.P.C. | Tribunals Are Not Courts: Private Complaints for Offences Like False Evidence Valid: Supreme Court Limitation | Right to Appeal Is Fundamental, Especially When Liberty Is at Stake: Supreme Court Condones 1637-Day Delay FIR Quashed | No Mens Rea, No Crime: Supreme Court Emphasizes Protection of Public Servants Acting in Good Faith Trademark | Passing Off Rights Trump Registration Rights: Delhi High Court A Minor Procedural Delay Should Not Disqualify Advances as Export Credit When Exports Are Fulfilled on Time: Bombay HC Preventive Detention Must Be Based on Relevant and Proximate Material: J&K High Court Terrorism Stems From Hateful Thoughts, Not Physical Abilities: Madhya Pradesh High Court Denies Bail of Alleged ISIS Conspiracy Forwarding Offensive Content Equals Liability: Madras High Court Upholds Conviction for Derogatory Social Media Post Against Women Journalists Absence of Receipts No Barrier to Justice: Madras High Court Orders Theft Complaint Referral Under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C Rajasthan High Court Emphasizes Rehabilitation, Grants Probation to 67-Year-Old Convicted of Kidnapping" P&H High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition Against Advocate Renuka Chopra: “A Frustrated Outburst Amid Systemic Challenges” Kerala High Court Criticizes Irregularities in Sabarimala Melsanthi Selection, Orders Compliance with Guidelines Non-Payment of Rent Does Not Constitute Criminal Breach of Trust: Calcutta High Court Administrative Orders Cannot Override Terminated Contracts: Rajasthan High Court Affirms in Landmark Decision Minimum Wage Claims Must Be Resolved by Designated Authorities Under the Minimum Wages Act, Not the Labour Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court Madras High Court Confirms Equal Coparcenary Rights for Daughters, Emphasizes Ancestral Property Rights

Harassment for Dowry Culminates in Tragedy: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Ten-Year Imprisonment in Dowry Death Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment addressing the grave issue of dowry deaths, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh has upheld the ten-year rigorous imprisonment of Kondru Israel for the dowry death of his wife. The verdict, pronounced on 1st February 2024 by Justice A.V. Ravindra Babu, reaffirmed the legal stance against the dowry menace.

The case, registered as Criminal Appeal No.1509 of 2010, revolved around the appellant Kondru Israel, who was convicted under Section 304-B of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for the harassment and subsequent death of his wife.

Justice Ravindra Babu, in his judgment, noted, "The death of the deceased was otherwise than in normal circumstances," highlighting the harrowing conditions leading to the victim's suicide. This observation was crucial in understanding the nature of the crime.

The court meticulously examined the testimonies of various witnesses, including the mother (PW1) and neighbors (PW4, PW6) of the deceased. Their accounts established a pattern of continuous harassment linked to the demand for unpaid dowry, a critical factor leading to the tragic demise of the appellant's wife.

In a noteworthy observation, the court stated, "The evidence of P.W.1 to P.W.3 categorically proves the fact that soon before death the deceased was subjected to harassment in connection with a demand for dowry." This statement underlined the direct correlation between the harassment and the victim's death.

The appellant's defense, which claimed the deceased's ill health led to her suicide, was found to be unsubstantiated. The court remarked, "No medical evidence provided to support claim – Defence considered an afterthought."

The judgment also emphasized the application of Section 113-B of the Indian Evidence Act, which deals with the presumption as to dowry death. The court determined that the proximity of harassment to the death of the deceased categorized the incident as a 'dowry death.'

Concluding the case, the High Court directed the appellant to surrender before the trial court, thereby confirming the sentence of ten years of rigorous imprisonment initially imposed by the III Additional District & Sessions Judge, Kakinada.

Date of Decision: 1st February 2024

Kondru Israel vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

 

Similar News