Presumption Of Correctness Of Judicial Records Not Absolute And Can Be Rebutted By Direct Evidence: Kerala High Court on Married Daughter Cannot Challenge Partition After 21-Year Slumber If She Had Knowledge: Madhya Pradesh High Court Kerala High Court Orders Immediate Suspension Of Lakshadweep CJM For Allegedly Forging Witness Deposition To Convict Accused Supreme Court Bars Post-Divorce Maintenance Claims When Wife Voluntarily Waived Maintenance In Settlement Agreement Advocate Is An Officer Of Court, Not Mere Agent Of Client: Allahabad High Court Distinguishes Between Active Concealment & Statement In Ignorance, Slaps Cost On Litigants For Misleading Bench Cannot Summon Accused Mechanically On Protest Petition Without Assigning Justifiable Reasons: Andhra Pradesh High Court Increment Not A Bounty: Allahabad High Court Rules Public Holiday Cannot Delay Pay Hike For Teachers Joining Next Working Day Paying Taxes Or Utility Connections Confer No Legal Ownership Over Govt Land': Andhra Pradesh High Court Orders Demolition Of Encroachment 'Cannot Compel Public Authority To Collect Data From Private Bodies': Bombay High Court Quashes CIC Orders Directing SEBI To Procure BSE Records Under RTI Act Section 10 CPC Cannot Stay Previously Instituted Title Suit Pending Subsequent Probate Case; Inherent Powers Under Section 151 Inapplicable When Probate Dismissed: Calcutta High Court Mere Phone Calls Without Transcripts No Ground For Murder Conspiracy: Delhi High Court Clear Violation Of Section 42 NDPS Act': Gujarat High Court Holds Failure To Record Secret Info In Writing Fatal When Police Officer Had Time To Act JK High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Cop Accused Of Threatening Advocate Over Phone Call Without Prior Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC Custody Unwarranted For Mere Formalities Once Weapon Is Recovered: Kerala High Court Grants Regular Bail In BNS Axe Attack Case Circumstances Of Crime Can Be Assessed During Trial: High Court Upholds Trial Of Minor As Adult Under JJ Act In Murder Case Statutory Deposit Under Order 21 Rule 89 CPC Is A Sine Qua Non; Litigant Cannot Stall Auction Sale By Merely Blaming Counsel: Madras High Court Ban Junk Food Within 50 Metres Of Schools: Rajasthan High Court Takes Suo Moto Cognizance To Enforce FSSAI Norms, Protect Children From Obesity

"Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Emphasizes 'Probable Defence' and 'Presumption of Innocence'"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Gujarat High Court, presided over by Justice M.K. Thakker, reaffirmed the acquittal of Ilaben Jitendrabhai Tilawat in a cheque dishonour case, originally acquitted by the 7th Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (Negotiable Instruments Court), Rajkot. The case, bearing R/Criminal Appeal (Against Acquittal) No. 2348 of 2022, was decided on 27th February 2024.

This appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the judgment dated 17th September 2022, in the context of a disputed cheque of Rs.7,70,000, which was returned with the endorsement 'account closed'. The complainant, Narendrabhai Kantilal Joshi, alleged that the cheque was issued by the respondent, Ilaben Jitendrabhai Tilawat, following a failed property transaction.

In delivering the judgment, Justice Thakker highlighted, "It would be sufficient to rebut the presumption raise under Section 139 of the N.I. Act if the accused raise probable defence, the standard of proof of accused to rebut the presumption under Section 139 of the N.I. Act is preponderance of the probability."

The Court meticulously reviewed the evidence and testimonies presented, including the discrepancies in the signatures on the cheque and the specimen signature card. The Court observed, "The signature on the cheque and on the specimen on the card is different signature and as the account was closed therefore, it was returned with an endorsement of 'closed account'."

Emphasizing the principle of 'presumption of innocence', the Court stated, "From the material which is brought on record was consistent with the innocence of the accused, which may reasonably be true, even though it is not positively prove to be proved then also accused would be entitled for acquittal."

In conclusion, the Court found no substantial reason to interfere with the trial court's decision and dismissed the appeal. The judgment and order of acquittal dated 17.09.2022 in Criminal Case No. 2729 of 2016 were thus confirmed.

The case was argued by Ms. Falguni D. Trivedi for the appellant and Ms. Monali Bhatt, Additional Public Prosecutor, for the respondent. This ruling is a pivotal affirmation of the legal principles governing cheque dishonour and the standards of proof required in criminal proceedings.

Date of Decision: 27-02-2024

Narendrabhai Kantilal Joshi vs. Ilaben Jitendrabhai Tilavat and Another 

 

Latest Legal News