Recovery Of Excess Payment Made By Mistake Is Permissible When Employee Furnished An Undertaking To Refund: Supreme Court Anticipatory Bail Application Under Sec 482 BNSS Is Maintainable Even If No Formal Order Of Arrest Is Passed By CGST Authorities: Allahabad High Court Consensual Physical Relationship Following Three-Year Courtship Does Not Amount To Rape If Marriage Promise Fails: Supreme Court Criminalization Of Civil Disputes | Courts Must Not Engage In Speculative Reasoning While Dealing With Quashing Petitions Under Section 482 CrPC: Supreme Court Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money In The Absence Of Proof Of Demand Is Insufficient To Sustain Conviction Under Section 7 And 13 PC Act: Supreme Court High Court Cannot Quash NDPS Proceedings Merely Relying On Jurisprudence Regarding Evidentiary Value Of Confessional Statements: Supreme Court Extra-Judicial Confession Made While In Police Custody Is Inadmissible In Evidence: Supreme Court Taxing Authorities Must Levy Tax Based On The Form Of Goods At The Time Of Sale, Not On Potential End Use: Supreme Court Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders CBI Probe Into State Corruption Scams After Punjab Police Fails To Act On ED’s Section 66(2) PMLA Referral Section 482 CrPC | FIR Based On Consensual Relationship Gone Sour Cannot Be Sustained To Coerce Marriage: Supreme Court CISF Personnel Soliciting Bribes For Employment Is Guilty Of 'Gross Misconduct' Under Section 18 CISF Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court PIL | State Cannot Use Demolition Powers To Silence Whistleblowers Or Deflect Accountability: Punjab & Haryana High Court Criminal Proceedings Against In-Laws Without Specific Allegations Of Overt Acts Constitute Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Order 22 Rule 9 CPC | Admission In An Abated Suit Does Not Constitute Estoppel Against Landlord In A Fresh Eviction Proceeding: Calcutta High Court Arbitral Award Cannot Be Set Aside For Non-Adjudication Of Claims Specifically Abandoned By Parties: Delhi High Court Mere Long Possession Is Not Adverse Possession; Defendant Must Prove Hostile Animus To Deny Title Of True Owner: Himachal Pradesh High Court Reopening Of Assessment Under Sec 148A(d) Income Tax Act Cannot Be Based On 'Change Of Opinion' Without Fresh Tangible Material: Gujarat High Court Municipal Authorities Must Initiate Formal Proceedings And Grant Opportunity Of Hearing Before Sealing Premises:  Jharkhand High Court Court Cannot Compel Third-Party To Undergo DNA Test Unless Necessary For Just Adjudication: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Cannot Defer Bail Application Merely Because A Transfer Petition Is Pending In High Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 108 BNS | Mere Taunts Or Harassment Regarding Not Bearing A Male Child Do Not Constitute Abetment To Suicide: Rajasthan High Court

"Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Emphasizes 'Probable Defence' and 'Presumption of Innocence'"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Gujarat High Court, presided over by Justice M.K. Thakker, reaffirmed the acquittal of Ilaben Jitendrabhai Tilawat in a cheque dishonour case, originally acquitted by the 7th Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (Negotiable Instruments Court), Rajkot. The case, bearing R/Criminal Appeal (Against Acquittal) No. 2348 of 2022, was decided on 27th February 2024.

This appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the judgment dated 17th September 2022, in the context of a disputed cheque of Rs.7,70,000, which was returned with the endorsement 'account closed'. The complainant, Narendrabhai Kantilal Joshi, alleged that the cheque was issued by the respondent, Ilaben Jitendrabhai Tilawat, following a failed property transaction.

In delivering the judgment, Justice Thakker highlighted, "It would be sufficient to rebut the presumption raise under Section 139 of the N.I. Act if the accused raise probable defence, the standard of proof of accused to rebut the presumption under Section 139 of the N.I. Act is preponderance of the probability."

The Court meticulously reviewed the evidence and testimonies presented, including the discrepancies in the signatures on the cheque and the specimen signature card. The Court observed, "The signature on the cheque and on the specimen on the card is different signature and as the account was closed therefore, it was returned with an endorsement of 'closed account'."

Emphasizing the principle of 'presumption of innocence', the Court stated, "From the material which is brought on record was consistent with the innocence of the accused, which may reasonably be true, even though it is not positively prove to be proved then also accused would be entitled for acquittal."

In conclusion, the Court found no substantial reason to interfere with the trial court's decision and dismissed the appeal. The judgment and order of acquittal dated 17.09.2022 in Criminal Case No. 2729 of 2016 were thus confirmed.

The case was argued by Ms. Falguni D. Trivedi for the appellant and Ms. Monali Bhatt, Additional Public Prosecutor, for the respondent. This ruling is a pivotal affirmation of the legal principles governing cheque dishonour and the standards of proof required in criminal proceedings.

Date of Decision: 27-02-2024

Narendrabhai Kantilal Joshi vs. Ilaben Jitendrabhai Tilavat and Another 

 

Latest Legal News