Section 32 Arbitration Act | Termination for Non-Payment of Fees Ends Arbitrator’s Mandate; Remedy Lies in Section 14(2): Supreme Court False Allegations of Dowry and Bigamy Amount to Mental Cruelty: Madras High Court Upholds Divorce Plaintiff Must Prove Her Own Title Before Seeking Demolition Of Defendant’s Pre-existing House: Andhra Pradesh High Court Mismatch Between Bullet and Recovered Gun Fatal to Prosecution: Calcutta High Court Acquits Man Convicted for Murder Where the Conduct of the Sole Eye-Witness Appears Unnatural and No Independent Witness Is Examined, Conviction Cannot Stand: Allahabad High Court Fraudulent Sale of Vehicle During Hire Purchase Renders Agreement Void: Gauhati High Court Upholds Decree for Refund of ₹4.90 Lakhs Unsigned Written Statement Can’t Silence a Defendant: Hyper-Technical Objections Must Yield to Substantive Justice: Delhi High Court Default Bail | No Accused, No Extension: Delhi High Court Rules Custody Extension Without Notice as Gross Illegality Under Article 21 Gratuity Can Be Withheld Post-Retirement for Proven Negligence Under Service Rules – Payment of Gratuity Act Does Not Override CDA Rules: Calcutta High Court Cognizance Is of the Offence, Not the Offender: Madras High Court Rejects Challenge to ED’s Supplementary Complaint in PMLA Case Acquittal in Rajasthan No Bar to Trial in Madhya Pradesh: MP High Court Rejects Double Jeopardy Plea in Antiquities Theft Case 20% Deposit Isn’t Automatic in Cheque Bounce Appeals: Right to Appeal Can’t Be Priced Out: Punjab & Haryana High Court Checks Mechanical Use of Section 148 NI Act A Child Is Not a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets New Benchmark in Compensation for Minors’ Deaths 90 Days Is Not Sacrosanct – Courts Can Permit Reply to Counter-Claim Even Beyond Prescribed Time in Interest of Justice: Punjab & Haryana High Court Magistrate Can Proceed Only for Offences Committed in India Until Sanction Is Obtained for Acts Outside India: Orissa High Court on International Financial Fraud Award Is Vitiated by Non-Consideration of Material Evidence: Orissa High Court Sets Aside Industrial Tribunal’s Wage Award in IMFA Case POCSO | Absence of Child's Name in Birth Certificate Not Fatal: Kerala High Court No One Has the Right to Impute Illicit Motives to Judges in the Name of Free Speech: Karnataka High Court Jails Man for Criminal Contempt DV Complaint Cannot Be Quashed at Threshold Under Article 227: Madras High Court Refuses to Interfere, Directs Accused to Seek Remedy Before Magistrate Recovery Wasn't From Accused's Exclusive Knowledge — Cylinder Already Marked in Site Plan Before Arrest: Allahabad High Court Acquits Man in Murder Case State Can’t Block SARFAESI Sale by Late Revenue Entries: Secured Creditor’s Charge Prevails Over Tax Dues: Punjab & Haryana High Court Slams Sub-Registrar’s Refusal Providing SIM Card Without Knowledge of Its Criminal Use Does Not Imply Criminal Conspiracy: P&H High Court Grants Bail in UAPA & Murder Case Importer Who Accepts Enhanced Valuation Cannot Later Contest Confiscation and Penalty for Undervaluation: Madras High Court Upholds Strict Liability under Customs Act "Allegations Are Not Proof: Madras High Court Refuses Divorce Without Substantiated Cruelty or Desertion" When FIR Is Filed After Consulting Political Leaders, the Possibility of Coloured Version Cannot Be Ruled Out: Kerala High Court Mere Allegations of Antecedents Without Conviction Can't Defeat Right to Anticipatory Bail: Kerala High Court Section 106 Of Evidence Act Cannot Be Invoked In Vacuum – Prosecution Must First Lay Foundational Facts: Karnataka High Court Acquits Wife And Co-Accused In Husband’s Murder Case Parity Cannot Be Claimed When Roles Are Different: Karnataka High Court Refuses Bail to Youth Accused of Brutal Killing Injured Wife Would Not Falsely Implicate Her Husband: Gauhati High Court Upholds Conviction in Domestic Stabbing Case Disputed Bids, Missing Evidence and No Prejudice: Delhi High Court Refuses to Intervene in Tender Challenge under Article 226 Setting Fire to House Where Only Minors Were Present is a Heinous Offence – No Quashing Merely Because Parties Settled: Calcutta High Court No Exclusive Possession Means Licence, Not Lease: Calcutta High Court Rules City Civil Court Has Jurisdiction to Evict Licensees Defendant's Own Family Attested the Sale Agreement – Yet She Called It Nominal: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Specific Performance Renewal Not Automatic, No Evidence Of Notice Or Mutual Agreement: AP High Court Dismisses Indian Oil’s Appeal Against Eviction

"Gujarat High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail in Delayed FIR Case: Highlights Discrepancies and Civil Nature of Dispute"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Gujarat High Court granted anticipatory bail to Azadbhai Chaturbhai Ramoliya, involved in a case registered under Sections 498A, 306, and 114 of the Indian Penal Code. The decision, pronounced by Honorable Mr. Justice M. R. Mengdey on December 22, 2023, has brought into focus the considerations of delayed FIRs and the nature of the disputes underlying such legal battles.

Justice Mengdey, in his observations, noted the unusual delay in the filing of the FIR, which related to an incident alleged to have occurred in 2016 but was only reported in 2023. "The delay caused in lodging the FIR has not been satisfactorily explained in the FIR," the Court observed, raising questions about the rationale behind the prolonged wait to initiate legal proceedings.

Furthermore, the Court drew attention to the civil nature of the dispute, an aspect underlined in the bail application of Jyotsanaben Azadbhai Ramoliya, the main conspirator and wife of the present applicant, who was previously granted anticipatory bail. The Court remarked, "It appears that there are contradictions regarding the date of the offense... prima facie, it appears that the dispute is of a civil nature."

The decision also referenced several landmark judgments emphasizing the liberal exercise of discretion in granting anticipatory bail, particularly in cases where the offenses carry a punishment of fewer than seven years. The Court, in its wisdom, balanced the need for fair investigation with the rights of the accused, stipulating several conditions for the grant of bail. These include cooperation with the investigation, the prohibition of influencing witnesses, regular reporting to the police station, and restrictions on travel.

This ruling is particularly noteworthy as it underscores the judicial system's approach to cases where delays and discrepancies in FIRs are evident. It also reflects the Court's inclination to differentiate between criminal and civil aspects of a dispute, ensuring that justice is served in a balanced manner.

Legal experts view this decision as a reaffirmation of the principles of justice, particularly in cases where the lines between civil disputes and criminal allegations are blurred. The Gujarat High Court's judgment thus sets a precedent for future cases, emphasizing careful judicial scrutiny in matters of anticipatory bail.

Date of Decision: 22nd December, 2023

Azadbhai Chaturbhai Ramoliya  Vs  State Of Gujarat

 

Latest Legal News