Statutory Embargo Under MCOCA Cannot Eclipse Right Against Prolonged Incarceration Under Article 21: Delhi High Court Grants Bail To Sukesh Chandra Shekhar’s Associate Family Court Must Declare Marital Status Based On Extra-Judicial Divorce Even If Undisputed By Parties: Allahabad High Court State Cannot Usurp Private Land For Public Road Without Compensation; Financial Burden No Ground To Evade Acquisition: Bombay High Court Vehicle Seized For Transporting Minerals Without Permit Must Be Released On Payment Of Penalty; Retention Serves No Purpose: Andhra Pradesh High Court Development Agreements Fall Under 'Commercial Disputes'; Market Value Of Property Determines 'Specified Value' Under CC Act: Calcutta High Court Tenant Cannot Retain Possession Based On Alleged Oral Sale Agreement & Cash Payments Without Written Registered Document: Delhi High Court Consent Decree In Specific Performance Suit Is Not A Mandatory Injunction; Limitation For Execution Is 12 Years Under Article 136: Gujarat High Court Fairness Not A One-Way Street; Habitual Defaulters Cannot Use Procedural Irregularities To Obstruct Recovery Under Section 29 SFC Act: Supreme Court Even On Lower Threshold Of 'Reasonable Cause', Delay In Filing Additional Docs Can't Be Condoned Without Justification: Supreme Court Commercial Suits: Supreme Court Rejects 'Piecemeal Approach' For Filing Additional Documents, Says Timelines Must Be Strictly Followed Customary Adoption Of 'Ghardamad' Must Be Strictly Proved; Property Devolves Upon Nearest Male Agnate In Absence Of Male Heir: Supreme Court 'Knowledge' Under Section 19 POCSO Not Limited To Direct Senses; Victim’s Credible Statement Sufficient To Trigger Reporting Duty: Supreme Court School Authorities Must Report POCSO Offence Immediately On Receiving Credible Info; Can't Conduct Own 'Verification': Supreme Court Amalgamation Of Bank Under Statutory Scheme Without Landlord's Consent Ground For Eviction; Involuntary Transfer No Defence: Supreme Court Arbitration Clause In MOU Does Not Bar Criminal Prosecution If Allegations Disclose Cognizable Offense: Telangana High Court SFIO Complaints Under Companies Act Don't Require Pre-Cognizance Hearing Of Accused Under Section 223 BNSS: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Government Aided School Hold Principal Beyond Retirement Age – Grant Withheld – Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Supreme Court held in the recent Judgement that (THE STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS. Vs H. B. KAPADIA EDUCATION TRUST & ANR D.D 21 Feb 2023) that Minority educational institutions, like the respondents, cannot continue employees beyond the age of 58 or 60, and if they do, they cannot receive grants from the government. Grant-in-Aid Code applies to all registered secondary education institutions receiving grants, and they are subject to its restrictions.

 A Jain minority institution ran a government-aided school and sought permission from the government to continue employing their principal beyond the age of 60. The DEO granted the permission to continue him as the Principal up to the age of 60 years on the condition that his salary would be paid by the Institution. When the institution sought further extension of the principal's service, it was rejected by the DEO, leading to a writ petition being filed by the institution. The single bench of the High Court allowed the writ petition, holding that the institution had the right to continue the principal's employment and that the government was obliged to pay the grant towards his salary. The Division Bench dismissed the government's appeal against this decision.

Supreme Court observed that Article 30(1) establishes the right of minorities to establish and administer educational institutions. The Gujarat Secondary Education Act provides for the regulation of secondary education in Gujarat and includes regulations related to the superannuation of employees in registered secondary schools.

Further observed that according to para 81.1 of the Grant-in-Aid Code, secondary school teachers receiving grant-in-aid usually retire at the age of 58. Management can grant extensions to teachers up to the age of 60, as per para 81.2. Minority educational institutions, like the respondents, cannot continue employees beyond the age of 58 or 60, and if they do, they cannot receive grants from the government. Grant-in-Aid Code applies to all registered secondary education institutions receiving grants, and they are subject to its restrictions.

Supreme Court held that the provisions of the Grant-in-Aid Code apply to all secondary schools, regardless of whether they are established and administered by the minority or not. Respondents cannot claim the right to receive aid from the government outside of the Code's provisions.

Supreme Court further held that the State did not discriminate against the respondent institution on the ground that it was under the management of a minority, attracting Article 30(2) of the Constitution of India. The High Court committed a gross error in holding that the respondent-institute had a right to continue the principal of its school beyond his age of 60 years. Appeal Allowed.

THE STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS. Vs H. B. KAPADIA EDUCATION TRUST & ANR

Latest Legal News