Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Four Accused Acquitted in Bahraich Murder Case – One Covicted Under Section 304 Part II IPC – Allahabad High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant development, the Allahabad High Court has delivered its verdict in the Bahraich murder case, acquitting four of the accused while maintaining the conviction of one. The judgment, delivered by Hon’ble Mrs. Jyotsna Sharma, J., sheds light on the complex dynamics of the case and the intricacies of the legal proceedings.

In her observations, Justice Jyotsna Sharma emphasized the importance of a cautious approach when considering the roles of accused individuals, especially in cases involving multiple parties. She noted, “The only real safeguard against the risk of condemning the innocent with the guilty lies in insisting on acceptable evidence which in some measure implicates such accused and satisfies the conscience of the court.”

The case revolved around a tragic incident in which the deceased, Nanku Singh, sustained fatal injuries. The prosecution had named nine individuals in connection with the incident. However, the court found it safe to convict only one of them, Triveni Singh, under Section 304 Part II of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). This decision was based on clear and unimpeachable evidence that Triveni Singh had inflicted the fatal injuries with a ‘bhala.’

The judgment further highlighted the challenges in determining the culpability of all accused persons when there is a long-standing enmity between the parties involved. Justice Sharma acknowledged that enmity can be a double-edged sword, both instigating criminal incidents and providing opportunities for victim sides to retaliate.

Notably, the court also discussed the value and limitations of a First Information Report (FIR) in criminal cases. While FIRs are crucial for setting the legal process in motion, they are not considered substantive evidence. The court emphasized the need to rely on acceptable evidence that establishes the complicity of accused individuals beyond a reasonable doubt.

In conclusion, the judgment by Hon’ble Mrs. Jyotsna Sharma, J., in the Bahraich murder case underscores the significance of a meticulous approach to criminal trials, ensuring that justice is served while safeguarding the rights of the accused.

Date of Decision: 17.10.2023

Jangali Singh And Others   vs State of U.P.     

Latest Legal News