Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Criminal Antecedents Disentitles Accused To Discretionary Relief Of Bail: Orissa High Court Section 311 CrPC | Delay Or Absence Of Examination-In-Chief No Bar To Summon Material Witnesses: Allahabad High Court Revenue Authorities Lack Jurisdiction To Declare Genuineness Of Wills Or Validity Of Settlement Deeds; Parties Must Approach Civil Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court Demand Of Bribe Is Sine Qua Non For Conviction Under PC Act, Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money Not Enough: Bombay High Court 'Promotion Effected Long Ago Not To Be Disturbed': Supreme Court Sets Aside HC Order Quashing 13-Year-Old Promotion; Holds 'Laying Rules' Directory Not Mandatory "Mere Oral Assertion Or 'Data Loss' Letter Not Enough To Prove Driving Licence Validity; Owner Has Strict Duty To Ensure Renewal": Supreme Court Reinstates Insurer's Non-Liability, Applies 'Pay & Recover' Principle "Zero Tolerance To Corruption": Supreme Court Reinstates FIRs Against Karnataka Cops, Slams High Court For 'Mini-Trial' & Exceeding S.482 CrPC Powers ‘Ancillary Services Don't Override Carriage’: Supreme Court Upholds 7.5% Presumptive Income For Cruise Operators Under Section 44B IT Act, Rejects Revenue's Higher Tax Claim Division Bench Refuses To Quash FIR, Holds It Cannot Nullify Single Judge's Final Order Directing Registration Of Case: Allahabad High Court High Court Leave Under Clause XII Doesn't Protect Transferred Suits; Section 16 CPC Strictly Applies To City Civil Court In 'Suits For Land': Bombay High Court Joint Account Holder Who Didn't Sign The Dishonoured Cheque Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 138 NI Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Suits Cannot Be Consolidated If Parties, Properties, And Causes Of Action Are Different: Telangana High Court P&H High Court Halts All Construction In Mohali's Shivalik Foothills Over Failure To Demarcate 'Forest Land', Bars Land Sale No Embargo On Issuing Single Statutory Notice Under Section 138 NI Act For Multiple Dishonoured Cheques: Orissa High Court District Collector Has No Jurisdiction Under CrPC To Order Reopening Of Investigation Or Recall Of Closure Report: Madhya Pradesh High Court No Exclusive Monopoly Over Geographical Term 'Malabar' In Isolation; Protection Limited To Registered Composite Marks: Kerala High Court Person In 'De Facto' Control Is A Promoter Under Companies Act Even If Designated As Professional Director: Karnataka High Court Supreme Court Urges Mandatory Animal Tagging, Strict Enforcement of Gaushala Laws To Tackle Stray Cattle Crisis; Holds Owners Accountable "Don't Render Victims Remediless": Supreme Court Slams High Court For Dismissing Plea Over Stray Bull Death, Awards ₹15 Lakh Compensation Supreme Court Red-Flags 'Unregulated Shadow Work' of Private Investigators, Calls For Legislative Overhaul on Digital Evidence & Privacy Rights 125 CrPC | Wife 'Not Entitled To Interim Maintenance If Adultery Established Ex Facie': Supreme Court Evidence Against Absconder Invalid Without Prior S.299 CrPC Order: SC Acquits Murder Accused Ad Valorem Court Fee Mandatory For Section 54 Appeals Challenging Land Acquisition Awards: Supreme Court

Four Accused Acquitted in Bahraich Murder Case – One Covicted Under Section 304 Part II IPC – Allahabad High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant development, the Allahabad High Court has delivered its verdict in the Bahraich murder case, acquitting four of the accused while maintaining the conviction of one. The judgment, delivered by Hon’ble Mrs. Jyotsna Sharma, J., sheds light on the complex dynamics of the case and the intricacies of the legal proceedings.

In her observations, Justice Jyotsna Sharma emphasized the importance of a cautious approach when considering the roles of accused individuals, especially in cases involving multiple parties. She noted, “The only real safeguard against the risk of condemning the innocent with the guilty lies in insisting on acceptable evidence which in some measure implicates such accused and satisfies the conscience of the court.”

The case revolved around a tragic incident in which the deceased, Nanku Singh, sustained fatal injuries. The prosecution had named nine individuals in connection with the incident. However, the court found it safe to convict only one of them, Triveni Singh, under Section 304 Part II of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). This decision was based on clear and unimpeachable evidence that Triveni Singh had inflicted the fatal injuries with a ‘bhala.’

The judgment further highlighted the challenges in determining the culpability of all accused persons when there is a long-standing enmity between the parties involved. Justice Sharma acknowledged that enmity can be a double-edged sword, both instigating criminal incidents and providing opportunities for victim sides to retaliate.

Notably, the court also discussed the value and limitations of a First Information Report (FIR) in criminal cases. While FIRs are crucial for setting the legal process in motion, they are not considered substantive evidence. The court emphasized the need to rely on acceptable evidence that establishes the complicity of accused individuals beyond a reasonable doubt.

In conclusion, the judgment by Hon’ble Mrs. Jyotsna Sharma, J., in the Bahraich murder case underscores the significance of a meticulous approach to criminal trials, ensuring that justice is served while safeguarding the rights of the accused.

Date of Decision: 17.10.2023

Jangali Singh And Others   vs State of U.P.     

Latest Legal News