Ocular Evidence Prevails Over Medical Findings: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Despite Negative Semen Report & Police Lapses High Court Cannot Pass Inconsistent Orders: Supreme Court Quashes Demolition Order Passed Despite Earlier Restraint In CMDA Regularisation Dispute Supreme Court Upholds Validity Of Open University Degrees Obtained Prior To 2017 Cut-Off Must Be A Polluter Before Being Held Absolutely Liable: Supreme Court Sets Aside NGT Order Against Art Of Living Over Yamuna Event, Orders ₹5 Cr Refund Father Cannot Be Deprived Of Minor's Custody Unless Proved Unfit: Allahabad High Court Hands Over 4-Yr-Old Child To Father, Sets Aside Trial Court Order Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 Integral To Personal Liberty': Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Bail As 24 Witnesses Remain Unexamined No Specific Chemical Opinion That Seized Substance Was Ganja: Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal Under Section 2(iii)(b) NDPS Act Mere Pendency Of Criminal Cases Simplicitor No Ground For Externment': Karnataka High Court Quashes Raichur SDM Order Order VI Rule 16 CPC | Defendants Enjoy Greater Latitude In Altering Defence: Punjab & Haryana High Court Explains Doctrinal Leeway Under CPC Boarding Running Train Not Self-Inflicted Injury: Delhi High Court Sets Aside Order Denying Compensation Possession Of One Co-Sharer Is Possession Of All: J&K&L High Court Cannot Invoke Article 226 For Registering FIR Or Restoring Water Supply: Kerala High Court Natural Guardian's Sale Of Minor's Property Without Court Nod Is Voidable, Extinguishes If Not Challenged Within 3 Years Of Majority: Madras High Court Orissa High Court Rejects Cancer-Survivor Husband's Plea To Transfer Maintenance Case Presumption Of Correctness Of Judicial Records Not Absolute And Can Be Rebutted By Direct Evidence: Kerala High Court on Married Daughter Cannot Challenge Partition After 21-Year Slumber If She Had Knowledge: Madhya Pradesh High Court Kerala High Court Orders Immediate Suspension Of Lakshadweep CJM For Allegedly Forging Witness Deposition To Convict Accused Defect In Served Copy Of Affidavit Not Fatal: Supreme Court Restores Election Petition Challenging Lok Sabha Poll Result, Clarifies Law On Form-25 Attestation

Four Accused Acquitted in Bahraich Murder Case – One Covicted Under Section 304 Part II IPC – Allahabad High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant development, the Allahabad High Court has delivered its verdict in the Bahraich murder case, acquitting four of the accused while maintaining the conviction of one. The judgment, delivered by Hon’ble Mrs. Jyotsna Sharma, J., sheds light on the complex dynamics of the case and the intricacies of the legal proceedings.

In her observations, Justice Jyotsna Sharma emphasized the importance of a cautious approach when considering the roles of accused individuals, especially in cases involving multiple parties. She noted, “The only real safeguard against the risk of condemning the innocent with the guilty lies in insisting on acceptable evidence which in some measure implicates such accused and satisfies the conscience of the court.”

The case revolved around a tragic incident in which the deceased, Nanku Singh, sustained fatal injuries. The prosecution had named nine individuals in connection with the incident. However, the court found it safe to convict only one of them, Triveni Singh, under Section 304 Part II of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). This decision was based on clear and unimpeachable evidence that Triveni Singh had inflicted the fatal injuries with a ‘bhala.’

The judgment further highlighted the challenges in determining the culpability of all accused persons when there is a long-standing enmity between the parties involved. Justice Sharma acknowledged that enmity can be a double-edged sword, both instigating criminal incidents and providing opportunities for victim sides to retaliate.

Notably, the court also discussed the value and limitations of a First Information Report (FIR) in criminal cases. While FIRs are crucial for setting the legal process in motion, they are not considered substantive evidence. The court emphasized the need to rely on acceptable evidence that establishes the complicity of accused individuals beyond a reasonable doubt.

In conclusion, the judgment by Hon’ble Mrs. Jyotsna Sharma, J., in the Bahraich murder case underscores the significance of a meticulous approach to criminal trials, ensuring that justice is served while safeguarding the rights of the accused.

Date of Decision: 17.10.2023

Jangali Singh And Others   vs State of U.P.     

Latest Legal News