Magistrate's Direction for Police Inquiry Under Section 202 CrPC Is Valid; Petitioner Must Await Investigation Outcome: Bombay High Court Dismisses Advocate's Petition as Premature    |     Tribunal’s Compensation Exceeding Claimed Amount Found Just and Fair Under Motor Vehicles Act: No Deduction Errors Warrant Reduction: Gujrat High Court    |     When Two Accused Face Identical Charges, One Cannot Be Convicted While the Other is Acquitted: Supreme Court Emphasizes Principle of Parity in Acquittal    |     Supreme Court Limits Interim Protection for Financial Institutions, Modifies Order on FIRs Filed by Borrowers    |     Kerala High Court Grants Regular Bail in Methamphetamine Case After Delay in Chemical Analysis Report    |     No Sign of Recent Intercourse; No Injury Was Found On Her Body Or Private Parts: Gauhati High Court Acquits Two In Gang Rape Case    |     Failure to Disclose Relationship with Key Stakeholder Led to Setting Aside of Arbitral Award: Gujarat High Court    |     Strict Compliance with UAPA's 7-Day Timeline for Sanctions is Essential:  Supreme Court    |     PAT Teachers Entitled to Regularization from 2014, Quashes Prospective Regularization as Arbitrary: Himachal Pradesh High Court    |     Punjab and Haryana High Court Upholds Anonymity Protections for Victims in Sensitive Cases: Right to Privacy Prevails Over Right to Information    |     Certified Copy of Will Admissible Under Registration Act, 1908: Allahabad HC Dismisses Plea for Production of Original Will    |     Injuries on Non-Vital Parts Do Not Warrant Conviction for Attempt to Murder: Madhya Pradesh High Court Modifies Conviction Under Section 307 IPC to Section 326 IPC    |     Classification Based on Wikipedia Data Inadmissible; Tribunal to Reassess Using Actual Financial Records: PH High Court Orders Reconsideration of Wage Dispute    |     Mere Delay in Initiation Does Not Justify Reduction of Damages: Jharkhand High Court on Provident Fund Defaults    |     Legatee Can Continue Suit Without Probate, But Decree Contingent on Probate Approval: Orissa High Court    |     An Award that Shocks the Conscience of the Court Cannot Stand, Especially When Public Money is Involved: Calcutta HC Reduces Quantum by Half    |     Trademark Transaction Within Territoriality Principle Subject to Indian Tax Laws: Bombay High Court Dismisses Hindustan Unilever's Petition on Non-Deduction of TDS    |     Concealment of Material Facts Bars Relief under Article 226: SC Reprimands Petitioners for Lack of Bonafides    |     Without Determination of the Will's Genuineness, Partition is Impossible: Supreme Court on Liberal Approach to Pleading Amendments    |     Candidates Cannot Challenge a Selection Process After Participating Without Protest : Delhi High Court Upholds ISRO's Administrative Officer Recruitment    |     Invalid Bank Guarantee Invocation Found Fatal to Recovery Claim: Delhi High Court Dismisses GAIL’s Appeal    |     Adverse Remarks in APAR Recorded Without Objectivity and Likely Motivated by Bias: Delhi High Court Quashes Biased APAR Downgrade of CRPF Officer    |    

Former CM Chandra Babu Naidu Got Anticipatory Bail Skill Development Scam Case – Lack of Direct Evidence: Andhra Pradesh

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant development, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, presided over by Justice T. Mallikarjuna Rao, granted regular bail to former Chief Minister Sri Nara Chandra Babu Naidu in the skill development scam case. The judgment, delivered on November 20, 2023, in Criminal Petition No. 7951 of 2023, has caught widespread attention, underscoring crucial aspects of legal principles and individual rights.

The case, which involves allegations of corruption and financial irregularities in the implementation of a skill development project by the Andhra Pradesh State Skill Development Corporation (APSSDC), had led to the arrest of Naidu among others. The prosecution accused Naidu of conspiring in a scheme that resulted in significant financial losses to the state exchequer.

In his ruling, Justice Rao cited several reasons for granting bail, emphasizing the absence of direct evidence linking the petitioner to the alleged crimes. He observed, “Despite serious allegations of financial misconduct, the prosecution failed to present prima facie material directly implicating the petitioner.” This lack of direct evidence played a pivotal role in the court’s decision.

Another critical factor in the court’s decision was the petitioner’s health condition. Naidu, aged 73, suffers from multiple health issues, including diabetes, hypertension, and Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy, necessitating regular medical care. The presence of Z+ security from the National Security Guard (NSG) also reduced the perceived flight risk, further tilting the scales in favor of granting bail.

The court also took into account the petitioner’s right to freedom of speech and political activity, especially in his capacity as the National President of the Telugu Desam Party (TDP). The judgment remarked on the importance of maintaining a balance between the liberty of the accused and the public interest. “The conditions initially imposed due to the interim nature of previous bail for medical reasons were relaxed, acknowledging the petitioner's fundamental rights,” stated Justice Rao in his judgment.

Furthermore, the judgment highlighted the need for a fair trial and the ongoing investigation. While the petitioner alleged political motivation behind his arrest, the court refrained from conclusive comments on these allegations, instead emphasizing the importance of an impartial judicial process.

Date of Decision: 20th November 2023

Sri Nara Chandra Babu Naidu VS The State Of Andhra Pradesh

Similar News