Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

Former CM Chandra Babu Naidu Got Anticipatory Bail Skill Development Scam Case – Lack of Direct Evidence: Andhra Pradesh

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant development, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, presided over by Justice T. Mallikarjuna Rao, granted regular bail to former Chief Minister Sri Nara Chandra Babu Naidu in the skill development scam case. The judgment, delivered on November 20, 2023, in Criminal Petition No. 7951 of 2023, has caught widespread attention, underscoring crucial aspects of legal principles and individual rights.

The case, which involves allegations of corruption and financial irregularities in the implementation of a skill development project by the Andhra Pradesh State Skill Development Corporation (APSSDC), had led to the arrest of Naidu among others. The prosecution accused Naidu of conspiring in a scheme that resulted in significant financial losses to the state exchequer.

In his ruling, Justice Rao cited several reasons for granting bail, emphasizing the absence of direct evidence linking the petitioner to the alleged crimes. He observed, “Despite serious allegations of financial misconduct, the prosecution failed to present prima facie material directly implicating the petitioner.” This lack of direct evidence played a pivotal role in the court’s decision.

Another critical factor in the court’s decision was the petitioner’s health condition. Naidu, aged 73, suffers from multiple health issues, including diabetes, hypertension, and Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy, necessitating regular medical care. The presence of Z+ security from the National Security Guard (NSG) also reduced the perceived flight risk, further tilting the scales in favor of granting bail.

The court also took into account the petitioner’s right to freedom of speech and political activity, especially in his capacity as the National President of the Telugu Desam Party (TDP). The judgment remarked on the importance of maintaining a balance between the liberty of the accused and the public interest. “The conditions initially imposed due to the interim nature of previous bail for medical reasons were relaxed, acknowledging the petitioner's fundamental rights,” stated Justice Rao in his judgment.

Furthermore, the judgment highlighted the need for a fair trial and the ongoing investigation. While the petitioner alleged political motivation behind his arrest, the court refrained from conclusive comments on these allegations, instead emphasizing the importance of an impartial judicial process.

Date of Decision: 20th November 2023

Sri Nara Chandra Babu Naidu VS The State Of Andhra Pradesh

Latest Legal News