Victim Has Locus To Request Court To Summon Witnesses Under Section 311 CrPC In State Prosecution: Allahabad High Court Order 2 Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Ground to Reject a Plaint: Supreme Court Draws Crucial Distinction Between Bar to Sue and Bar by Law No Right to Lawyer Before Advisory Board in Preventive Detention — Unless Government Appears Through Legal Practitioner: Supreme Court Wife's Dowry Statement Cannot Be Used to Prosecute Her for 'Giving' Dowry: Supreme Court Upholds Section 7(3) Shield Husband's Loan Repayments Cannot Reduce Wife's Maintenance: Supreme Court Raises Amount to ₹25,000 From ₹15,000 Prisoners Don't Surrender Their Rights at the Prison Gate: Supreme Court Issues Binding SOP to End Delays in Legal Aid Appeals A Judgment Must Be a Self-Contained Document Even When Defendant Never Appears: Supreme Court on Ex Parte Decrees Court Cannot Dismiss Ex Parte Suit on Unpleaded, Unframed Issue: Supreme Court Sets Aside Specific Performance Decree Denied on Title Erroneous High Court Observations Cannot Be Used to Stake Property Claims: Supreme Court Steps In to Prevent Misuse of Judicial Observations No Criminal Proceedings Would Have Been Initiated Had Financial Settlement Succeeded: Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail In Rape Case Directors Cannot Escape Pollution Law Prosecution by Claiming Ignorance: Allahabad High Court Refuses to Quash Summons Against Company Directors Order 7 Rule 11 CPC | Court Cannot Peek Into Defence While Rejecting Plaint: Delhi High Court Death 3½ Months After Accident Doesn't Break Causal Link If Doctors Testify Injuries Could Cause Death: Andhra Pradesh High Court LLB Intern Posed as Supreme Court Advocate, Used Fake Bar Council Card and Police Station Seals to Defraud Victims of Rs. 80 Lakhs: Gujarat High Court Rejects Anticipatory Bail Husband Who Travels to Wife's City on Leave, Cohabits With Her, Then Claims She 'Never Lived With Him' Cannot Prove Cruelty: Jharkhand High Court Liquor Licence Is a State Privilege, Not a Citizen's Right — No Vested Right of Renewal Survives a Change in Rules: Karnataka High Court Sets Aside Stay on E-Auction Policy Court Holiday Cannot Save Prosecution From Default Bail: MP High Court No Search At Your Premises, No Incriminating Document, No Case: Rajasthan HC Quashes Rs. 18 Crore Tax Assessment Under Section 153C Limitation Act | Litigant Cannot Be Punished For Court's Own Docket Load: J&K High Court

Former CM Chandra Babu Naidu Got Anticipatory Bail Skill Development Scam Case – Lack of Direct Evidence: Andhra Pradesh

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant development, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, presided over by Justice T. Mallikarjuna Rao, granted regular bail to former Chief Minister Sri Nara Chandra Babu Naidu in the skill development scam case. The judgment, delivered on November 20, 2023, in Criminal Petition No. 7951 of 2023, has caught widespread attention, underscoring crucial aspects of legal principles and individual rights.

The case, which involves allegations of corruption and financial irregularities in the implementation of a skill development project by the Andhra Pradesh State Skill Development Corporation (APSSDC), had led to the arrest of Naidu among others. The prosecution accused Naidu of conspiring in a scheme that resulted in significant financial losses to the state exchequer.

In his ruling, Justice Rao cited several reasons for granting bail, emphasizing the absence of direct evidence linking the petitioner to the alleged crimes. He observed, “Despite serious allegations of financial misconduct, the prosecution failed to present prima facie material directly implicating the petitioner.” This lack of direct evidence played a pivotal role in the court’s decision.

Another critical factor in the court’s decision was the petitioner’s health condition. Naidu, aged 73, suffers from multiple health issues, including diabetes, hypertension, and Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy, necessitating regular medical care. The presence of Z+ security from the National Security Guard (NSG) also reduced the perceived flight risk, further tilting the scales in favor of granting bail.

The court also took into account the petitioner’s right to freedom of speech and political activity, especially in his capacity as the National President of the Telugu Desam Party (TDP). The judgment remarked on the importance of maintaining a balance between the liberty of the accused and the public interest. “The conditions initially imposed due to the interim nature of previous bail for medical reasons were relaxed, acknowledging the petitioner's fundamental rights,” stated Justice Rao in his judgment.

Furthermore, the judgment highlighted the need for a fair trial and the ongoing investigation. While the petitioner alleged political motivation behind his arrest, the court refrained from conclusive comments on these allegations, instead emphasizing the importance of an impartial judicial process.

Date of Decision: 20th November 2023

Sri Nara Chandra Babu Naidu VS The State Of Andhra Pradesh

Latest Legal News