At the Stage of Framing Charge, Presumption Suffices; Suicide Note and Grave Suspicion Enough: Allahabad High Court Refuses to Quash Charge Under Section 306 IPC 173 CrPC | Framing of Charge Marks End of Investigation—Complainant Cannot Reopen Probe Merely by Citing Police Lapses: Bombay High Court Recovery Alone Cannot Prove Guilt: Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Photos, Videos Must Go: Supreme Court Binds Warring Spouses to Clean Up Social Media in Matrimonial Settlement Standard for Bail Under Section 319 CrPC Is Higher Than Framing of Charge, But Short of Conviction: Supreme Court Grants Bail to Accused Summoned Mid-Trial State Cannot Arbitrarily Deny Subsidies to 'New Industrial Units' by Retrospectively Applying Expansion Caps: Supreme Court Companies Act | Offence Under Section 448 Is Covered Under Section 447: Supreme Court Bars Private Complaint Without SFIO Nod “See-To-It” Obligation Is Not A Guarantee Under Indian Law: Supreme Court Clarifies Scope Of Section 126 ICA In IBC Disputes Mere Employment of Litigant’s Relatives in Police or Court Doesn't Prove Judicial Bias: Supreme Court Sets Aside Transfer of Criminal Case Reserved Candidate Availing Relaxed Standards in Prelims Cannot Migrate to General Quota for Cadre Allocation: Supreme Court Mere Vesting Does Not Mean Possession: Supreme Court Rules ULC Proceedings Abated For Failure To Serve Mandatory Notice To Actual Occupants Contempt of Courts Act | Natural Justice in Administrative Action: Supreme Court Directs West Bengal Govt to Re-Adjudicate Teachers' Arrears Claims Live-In Relationship with Married Man Not a ‘Relationship in the Nature of Marriage’ Under Domestic Violence Act: Bombay High Court Applies Supreme Court Guidelines Income Tax Act | Substitution of Shares held as Stock-in-Trade upon Amalgamation constitutes Taxable Business Income if Commercially Realisable: Supreme Court Judges Cannot Enact Their Own Protocols During Bail Hearings: Supreme Court Sets Aside Sweeping Age Determination Directions In POCSO If There Is Knowledge That Injury Is Likely To Cause Death, But No Intention Falls Under Section 304 Part II:  Supreme Court High Court Ignored POCSO’s Statutory Rigour, Committed Grave Error in Granting Bail: Supreme Court Cancels Bail of Gang-Rape Accused Section 22 HSA | Co-Heirs Have Statutory Right of Pre-Emption Even in Urban Property: Punjab & Haryana High Court 138 NI Act | Issuance of Separate Cheques Gives Rise to Independent Causes of Action, Even if Drawn for Same Underlying Transaction: Supreme Court

Former CM Chandra Babu Naidu Got Anticipatory Bail Skill Development Scam Case – Lack of Direct Evidence: Andhra Pradesh

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant development, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, presided over by Justice T. Mallikarjuna Rao, granted regular bail to former Chief Minister Sri Nara Chandra Babu Naidu in the skill development scam case. The judgment, delivered on November 20, 2023, in Criminal Petition No. 7951 of 2023, has caught widespread attention, underscoring crucial aspects of legal principles and individual rights.

The case, which involves allegations of corruption and financial irregularities in the implementation of a skill development project by the Andhra Pradesh State Skill Development Corporation (APSSDC), had led to the arrest of Naidu among others. The prosecution accused Naidu of conspiring in a scheme that resulted in significant financial losses to the state exchequer.

In his ruling, Justice Rao cited several reasons for granting bail, emphasizing the absence of direct evidence linking the petitioner to the alleged crimes. He observed, “Despite serious allegations of financial misconduct, the prosecution failed to present prima facie material directly implicating the petitioner.” This lack of direct evidence played a pivotal role in the court’s decision.

Another critical factor in the court’s decision was the petitioner’s health condition. Naidu, aged 73, suffers from multiple health issues, including diabetes, hypertension, and Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy, necessitating regular medical care. The presence of Z+ security from the National Security Guard (NSG) also reduced the perceived flight risk, further tilting the scales in favor of granting bail.

The court also took into account the petitioner’s right to freedom of speech and political activity, especially in his capacity as the National President of the Telugu Desam Party (TDP). The judgment remarked on the importance of maintaining a balance between the liberty of the accused and the public interest. “The conditions initially imposed due to the interim nature of previous bail for medical reasons were relaxed, acknowledging the petitioner's fundamental rights,” stated Justice Rao in his judgment.

Furthermore, the judgment highlighted the need for a fair trial and the ongoing investigation. While the petitioner alleged political motivation behind his arrest, the court refrained from conclusive comments on these allegations, instead emphasizing the importance of an impartial judicial process.

Date of Decision: 20th November 2023

Sri Nara Chandra Babu Naidu VS The State Of Andhra Pradesh

Latest Legal News