MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Former CM Chandra Babu Naidu Got Anticipatory Bail Skill Development Scam Case – Lack of Direct Evidence: Andhra Pradesh

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant development, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, presided over by Justice T. Mallikarjuna Rao, granted regular bail to former Chief Minister Sri Nara Chandra Babu Naidu in the skill development scam case. The judgment, delivered on November 20, 2023, in Criminal Petition No. 7951 of 2023, has caught widespread attention, underscoring crucial aspects of legal principles and individual rights.

The case, which involves allegations of corruption and financial irregularities in the implementation of a skill development project by the Andhra Pradesh State Skill Development Corporation (APSSDC), had led to the arrest of Naidu among others. The prosecution accused Naidu of conspiring in a scheme that resulted in significant financial losses to the state exchequer.

In his ruling, Justice Rao cited several reasons for granting bail, emphasizing the absence of direct evidence linking the petitioner to the alleged crimes. He observed, “Despite serious allegations of financial misconduct, the prosecution failed to present prima facie material directly implicating the petitioner.” This lack of direct evidence played a pivotal role in the court’s decision.

Another critical factor in the court’s decision was the petitioner’s health condition. Naidu, aged 73, suffers from multiple health issues, including diabetes, hypertension, and Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy, necessitating regular medical care. The presence of Z+ security from the National Security Guard (NSG) also reduced the perceived flight risk, further tilting the scales in favor of granting bail.

The court also took into account the petitioner’s right to freedom of speech and political activity, especially in his capacity as the National President of the Telugu Desam Party (TDP). The judgment remarked on the importance of maintaining a balance between the liberty of the accused and the public interest. “The conditions initially imposed due to the interim nature of previous bail for medical reasons were relaxed, acknowledging the petitioner's fundamental rights,” stated Justice Rao in his judgment.

Furthermore, the judgment highlighted the need for a fair trial and the ongoing investigation. While the petitioner alleged political motivation behind his arrest, the court refrained from conclusive comments on these allegations, instead emphasizing the importance of an impartial judicial process.

Date of Decision: 20th November 2023

Sri Nara Chandra Babu Naidu VS The State Of Andhra Pradesh

Latest Legal News