Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

FIR Quashed - Civil Liability Cannot be Converted into Criminal Case: Punjab & Haryana High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana emphasized that mere breach of a contractual agreement does not amount to criminal offense under Sections 420 & 120-B of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

Background: The Court considered the petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C.) for quashing FIR No. 38 dated 01.07.2022, filed under Sections 420 & 120-B of IPC, which involved allegations of cheating and criminal conspiracy connected to a breach of a marital agreement.

Facts and Issues: The FIR, based on an agreement executed between the parties’ parents, alleged that the petitioner, Manpreet Kaur, did not fulfill her obligation to assist her husband, the respondent, in immigrating to Canada, despite substantial financial expenditure incurred by the respondent's family.

Civil Remedy Over Criminal Prosecution: The Court observed that the agreement provided for a civil remedy in case of breach and stressed that turning a civil dispute into a criminal prosecution is an abuse of law. The court cited the cases "Mariam Fasihuddin v. State by Adugodi Police Station" (2024 INSC 49) and "Anand Kumar Mohatta v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)" (2019(11) SCC 706) in support of its decision.

Interpretation of Cheating: The Court held that there was no initial dishonest intent or inducement by the petitioner, thus not meeting the criteria for Section 420 IPC.

Abuse of Legal Process: The petitioners' actions were deemed not to constitute cheating, and initiating criminal proceedings for a contractual breach was seen as an abuse of the judicial process.

Decision: The FIR No. 38 dated 01.07.2022 was quashed, with the Court directing that civil liabilities should not be transformed into criminal cases.

Date of Decision: March 15, 2024

Manpreet Kaur and another v. State of Punjab and another

Latest Legal News