Prolonged Pre-Trial Detention and Right to Liberty Cannot Be Ignored” - Punjab & Haryana High Court Emphasizes Bail as the Rule Taxation Law | Andhra Pradesh High Court Rules Hotel’s Expenditures on Carpets, Mattresses, and Lampshades are Deductible as Current Expenditures Orissa High Court Upholds Disengagement of Teacher for Unauthorized Absence and Suppression of Facts In Disciplined Forces, Transfers are an Administrative Necessity; Judicial Interference is Limited to Cases of Proven Mala Fide: Patna High Court Act Of Judge, When Free From Oblique Motive, Cannot Be Questioned: Madhya Pradesh High Court Quashes Disciplinary Proceedings Against Additional Collector Registration Act | False Statements in Conveyance Documents Qualify for Prosecution Under Registration Act: Kerala High Court When Junior is Promoted, Senior’s Case Cannot be Deferred Unjustly: Karnataka High Court in Sealed Cover Promotion Dispute Medical Training Standards Cannot Be Lowered, Even for Disability’ in MBBS Admission Case: Delhi HC Suspicion, However Strong It May Be, Cannot Take Place Of Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds Acquittal No Detention Order Can Rely on Grounds Already Quashed: High Court Sets Precedent on Preventive Detention Limits Tenant's Claims of Hardship and Landlord's Alternate Accommodations Insufficient to Prevent Eviction: Allahabad HC Further Custodial Detention May Not Be Necessary: Calcutta High Court Grants Bail in Murder Case Citing Lack of Specific Evidence High Court, As A Constitutional Court Of Record, Possesses The Inherent Power To Correct Its Own Record: Bombay High Court A Fresh Section 11 Arbitration Petition Without Liberty Granted at the Time of Withdrawal is Not Maintainable: Supreme Court; Principles of Order 23 CPC Applied Adult Sexual Predators Ought Not To Be Dealt With Leniency Or Extended Misplaced Sympathy: Sikkim High Court Retired Employee Entitled to Interest on Delayed Leave Encashment Despite Absence of Statutory Provision: Delhi HC Punjab and Haryana High Court Grants Full Disability Pension and Service Element for Life to Army Veteran Taxation Law | Director Must Be Given Notice to Prove Lack of Negligence: Telangana High Court Quashes Order Against Director in Tax Recovery Case High Court of Uttarakhand Acquits Defendants in High-Profile Murder Case, Cites Lack of Evidence In Cases of Financial Distress, Imposing A Mandatory Deposit Under Negotiable Instruments Act May Jeopardize Appellant’s Right To Appeal: Rajasthan High Court

FIR Quashed - Civil Liability Cannot be Converted into Criminal Case: Punjab & Haryana High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana emphasized that mere breach of a contractual agreement does not amount to criminal offense under Sections 420 & 120-B of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

Background: The Court considered the petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C.) for quashing FIR No. 38 dated 01.07.2022, filed under Sections 420 & 120-B of IPC, which involved allegations of cheating and criminal conspiracy connected to a breach of a marital agreement.

Facts and Issues: The FIR, based on an agreement executed between the parties’ parents, alleged that the petitioner, Manpreet Kaur, did not fulfill her obligation to assist her husband, the respondent, in immigrating to Canada, despite substantial financial expenditure incurred by the respondent's family.

Civil Remedy Over Criminal Prosecution: The Court observed that the agreement provided for a civil remedy in case of breach and stressed that turning a civil dispute into a criminal prosecution is an abuse of law. The court cited the cases "Mariam Fasihuddin v. State by Adugodi Police Station" (2024 INSC 49) and "Anand Kumar Mohatta v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)" (2019(11) SCC 706) in support of its decision.

Interpretation of Cheating: The Court held that there was no initial dishonest intent or inducement by the petitioner, thus not meeting the criteria for Section 420 IPC.

Abuse of Legal Process: The petitioners' actions were deemed not to constitute cheating, and initiating criminal proceedings for a contractual breach was seen as an abuse of the judicial process.

Decision: The FIR No. 38 dated 01.07.2022 was quashed, with the Court directing that civil liabilities should not be transformed into criminal cases.

Date of Decision: March 15, 2024

Manpreet Kaur and another v. State of Punjab and another

Similar News