Explicit Averments Are Sufficient to Establish Knowledge: Supreme Court Restores Complaint Under Section 138 NI Act MACT | Just Compensation Must Factor in Loss of Dependency, Future Prospects, and Emotional Plight of Survivors: Supreme Court Compensation Must Reflect Justice, Not Delays—Court Shifts Market Valuation to 2019: Supreme Court Orders Compensation Recalculated for Land Acquired in 2003 Child’s Welfare Takes Precedence Over Parental Disputes: Supreme Court Modifies Interim Visitation Arrangement Settlement Cannot Justify Quashing Criminal Proceedings in Economic Offenses: Supreme Court Supreme Court Restores Higher Compensation for Land Acquired in Mewat: High Court Erred in Undervaluation Non-Alienability of Assigned Lands is a Non-Negotiable Legal Principle: Supreme Court of India Fraudulent Claims Cannot Prevail: Courts Must Deny Relief to Litigants with Unclean Hands: Supreme Court Non-Alienability of Assigned Lands is Fundamental to Public Policy: Supreme Court on the Andhra Pradesh Assigned Lands Act, 1977 MCD Authorized to Initiate Tariff Adoption Under Section 63 Electricity Act: Supreme Court Reinstates Delhi Waste-to-Energy Project Unexplained Delays and Contradictions in Evidence Lead to Acquittal: Telangana High Court No Mens Rea or Loss to State Exchequer: Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes FIR in Cartage Policy Case Bar Councils cannot impose additional charges contrary to Supreme Court directives: Kerala HC Investigation is not theatrics; it must serve justice with coherence and truth: J&K HC Quashes FIRs in a Case of Alleged Legal System Exploitation Acquittal in Criminal Case Does Not Affect Disciplinary Proceedings or Forfeiture of Gratuity: Gujarat High Court Delhi High Court Restores Wife’s Right to Cross-Examination, Calls for Sensitivity in Matrimonial Cases Order 6 Rule 17 | Subsequent Events Can Justify Amendment of Pleadings Even After Trial: Calcutta High Court Order VII Rule 11 CPC | Triable Issues Arising From Contradictory Sale Deeds Demand Full Adjudication Through Trial: Bombay High Court Mere Allegations Won't Suffice: AP High Court Orders Government to Pay Contractor, Reduces Interest on Recovery Suspicion Cannot Substitute Proof: Allahabad High Court Acquits Appellant in Circumstantial Evidence-Based Murder Case No Evidence, No Resumption: Andhra High Court Confirms Injunction Protecting Plaintiffs’ Possession of Lands Desertion and irretrievable breakdown of marriage, sustained for over two decades, constitute mental cruelty: Allahabad High Court Dissolves 34-Year-Old Marriage Acquittal in Criminal Case Must Prompt Review of Dismissal: Telangana High Court There Must Be an Intention to Provoke or Drive the Victim to Commit Suicide: High Court Discharges Accused in Abetment of Suicide Case Plaintiffs' Claim of Private Ownership Over Public Road Fails: Balance of Convenience Favors Defendants, Rules Bombay High Court No Prima Facie Case Against Petitioners: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR on Unauthorized Construction Investigation Delayed; Fundamental Right to Travel Cannot Be Curtailed Without Justification: Delhi High Court Upholds Suspension of LOC Minority Members Cannot Stall Redevelopment: Gujarat High Court Upholds Majority Consent in Nidhi Apartment Case” Sufficient Proof of Security Ownership is Essential: Kerala High Court in Partition Suit Madras High Court Quashes Hate Speech Case Against Political Leader Over YouTube Remarks 'Employers Cannot Unilaterally Alter Employment Terms: Punjab And Haryana High Court Suspicious Circumstances Invalidated Unregistered Will in Partition Dispute: Supreme Court Consent from State Not Required for Investigation of Offenses Under Central Acts Against Central Government Employees: Supreme Court Vague Allegations Cannot Justify Criminal Proceedings: Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Foreign National Strict Proof Not Required in Accident Claims; Preponderance of Probability Is Sufficient: Supreme Court Leaseholders of Shamlat Deh Lands Are Not Entitled to Ownership; Eviction Orders Upheld: Supreme Court Environmental and Energy Laws Must Be Harmonized to Tackle Waste Challenges: Supreme Court Vague Allegations Unsupported by Evidence Cannot Sustain Criminal Prosecution: Supreme Court Quashes FIR Under Sections 354 and 506 IPC Acquittal in Primary Offence Nullifies Proclaimed Offender Status and Section 174A IPC Proceedings: Supreme Court Merits of the Case Should Not Be Prejudged at Bail Stage: Supreme Court Quashes High Court’s Bail Order in MCOCA Case Quashing | Cognizance Without Compliance to Section 195 CrPC Vitiates Entire Proceedings: Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings

False Criminal Charges Against Spouse Can Constitute Mental Cruelty Justifying Divorce – Delhi High Court Grants Divorce On Grounds Of Cruelty Under Section 13(1)(ia) Of The Hindu Marriage Act

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Delhi High Court has overturned the decision of the Family Court and granted a decree of divorce on the grounds of cruelty, under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The court pronounced that false criminal accusations and a prolonged legal battle can amount to mental cruelty.

Legal Point: The pivotal legal point in this case centered on the interpretation of “cruelty” as a ground for divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act. The court emphasized that false criminal proceedings initiated by one spouse against the other constitute mental cruelty and are sufficient grounds for dissolution of marriage.

Facts and Issues: The appellant, Dharmender Singh Bisht, had appealed the dismissal of his divorce petition by the Family Court, which initially found no sufficient evidence of cruelty or dowry harassment by the respondent, Babita Bisht. The primary allegations involved false criminal accusations lodged by the respondent against the appellant, impacting his personal and professional life.

Evidence of Cruelty: The court noted the appellant’s acquittal in the criminal proceedings initiated by the respondent, highlighting the lack of substantiated claims against him. This was seen as indicative of the respondent’s intent to inflict mental agony on the appellant.

Impact of False Allegations: Observations by the court underscored the severe impact of false allegations on the appellant’s reputation and mental health. The prolonged criminal trial, spanning nearly two decades, was deemed an act of mental cruelty.

Irretrievable Breakdown: The court observed that the marriage was irretrievably broken, with no realistic prospect of reconciliation, further substantiating the need for divorce.

Departmental Inquiry: The appellant was subjected to a departmental inquiry due to complaints filed by the respondent, which eventually exonerated him. This reinforced the claim of mental cruelty due to false accusations.

Decision: The High Court reversed the Family Court’s judgment and granted a decree of divorce on the grounds of cruelty. It was held that the cumulative acts of the respondent, particularly the initiation of baseless criminal proceedings, amounted to mental cruelty against the appellant.

Date of Decision: May 3, 2024.

Dharmender Singh Bisht vs. Babita Bisht

Similar News