Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

False Allegations of Dowry and Domestic Violence Constitute Mental Cruelty: Delhi High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the High Court of Delhi, comprising Hon'ble Mr. Justice Suresh Kumar Kait and Hon'ble Ms. Justice Neena Bansal Krishna, granted a decree of divorce on the grounds of cruelty, in the case of XXXX , highlighting the repercussions of false allegations in matrimonial disputes.

Legal Point: The judgment delved into the interpretation of 'cruelty' as a ground for divorce under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, especially in the context of false allegations and their impact on the mental well-being of the individual.

Facts and Issues: The marital discord between Sandeep Singh (Appellant) and Jagwanti @ Nidhi (Respondent) led to the appellant seeking divorce, citing cruelty and desertion. He alleged false accusations of dowry demands and domestic violence by the respondent. Despite the acquittal of the appellant and his family in the criminal proceedings initiated by the respondent, the Family Court initially dismissed the divorce petition, prompting the appeal to the High Court.

On Cruelty: The Court found that the false accusations made by the respondent against the appellant, which led to criminal proceedings and subsequent acquittal, amounted to mental cruelty. The judgment stated, “the respondent’s unsubstantiated allegations of dowry demand and domestic violence...committed cruelty upon the appellant.”

The Court observed the respondent's repeated and extended absences from the matrimonial home and lack of efforts to reconcile as indicative of desertion. The judgment emphasized the necessity of a permanent intention to end cohabitation in establishing desertion.

Decision: Overruling the Family Court's decision, the High Court granted a divorce to the appellant, citing the mental agony caused by false allegations and the respondent's desertion as grounds for the decision.

Date of Decision : February 28, 2024

Xxx vs xxx

Latest Legal News