MACT | Fraud Vitiates All Judicial Acts, Even Without Specific Review Powers: Rajasthan High Court    |     Right of Private Defense Cannot Be Weighed in Golden Scales: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Appellant in Culpable Homicide Case    |     Pre-Arrest Bail Not a Right but an Exception: Himachal High Court Denied Bail In Dowry Death Case"    |     Service Law | Similarly Situated Employees Cannot Be Denied Equal Treatment: PH High Court Orders Regularization    |     Presumption of Innocence Remains Supreme Unless Clearly Overturned: PH High Court Affirming Acquittal    |     Any Physical Liaison with A Girl Of Less Than Eighteen Years Is A Strict Offense.: Patna High Court Reiterates Strict Stance On Sexual Offences Against Minors    |     Orissa High Court Rules Res Judicata Inapplicable When Multiple Appeals Arise from Same Judgment    |     Mandatory Section 80 Notice Cannot Be Bypassed Lightly:  Jammu & Kashmir High Court Returns Plaint for Non-Compliance    |     Bombay High Court Denies Permanent Lecturer Appointment for Failing to Meet UGC Eligibility Criteria at Time of Appointment    |     Deferred Cross-Examination Gave Time for Witness Tampering, Undermining Fair Trial: Allahabad High Court    |     Dowry Death | Presumption Under Section 113-B Not Applicable as No Proof of Cruelty Soon Before Death : Supreme Court    |     Land Acquisition | Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. (JAL) Liable for Compensation under Supplementary Award, Not Ultra-Tech Cement Ltd.: Supreme Court    |     Non-Mentioning of Bail Orders in Detention Reflects Clear Non-Application of Mind: J&K High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order    |     Conviction Under Arms Act and Criminal Conspiracy Quashed Due to Non-Seizure of Key Evidence and Failure to Prove Ownership of Box: Jharkhand High Court    |    

False Allegations of Dowry and Domestic Violence Constitute Mental Cruelty: Delhi High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the High Court of Delhi, comprising Hon'ble Mr. Justice Suresh Kumar Kait and Hon'ble Ms. Justice Neena Bansal Krishna, granted a decree of divorce on the grounds of cruelty, in the case of XXXX , highlighting the repercussions of false allegations in matrimonial disputes.

Legal Point: The judgment delved into the interpretation of 'cruelty' as a ground for divorce under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, especially in the context of false allegations and their impact on the mental well-being of the individual.

Facts and Issues: The marital discord between Sandeep Singh (Appellant) and Jagwanti @ Nidhi (Respondent) led to the appellant seeking divorce, citing cruelty and desertion. He alleged false accusations of dowry demands and domestic violence by the respondent. Despite the acquittal of the appellant and his family in the criminal proceedings initiated by the respondent, the Family Court initially dismissed the divorce petition, prompting the appeal to the High Court.

On Cruelty: The Court found that the false accusations made by the respondent against the appellant, which led to criminal proceedings and subsequent acquittal, amounted to mental cruelty. The judgment stated, “the respondent’s unsubstantiated allegations of dowry demand and domestic violence...committed cruelty upon the appellant.”

The Court observed the respondent's repeated and extended absences from the matrimonial home and lack of efforts to reconcile as indicative of desertion. The judgment emphasized the necessity of a permanent intention to end cohabitation in establishing desertion.

Decision: Overruling the Family Court's decision, the High Court granted a divorce to the appellant, citing the mental agony caused by false allegations and the respondent's desertion as grounds for the decision.

Date of Decision : February 28, 2024

Xxx vs xxx

Similar News