Prolonged Pre-Trial Detention and Right to Liberty Cannot Be Ignored” - Punjab & Haryana High Court Emphasizes Bail as the Rule Taxation Law | Andhra Pradesh High Court Rules Hotel’s Expenditures on Carpets, Mattresses, and Lampshades are Deductible as Current Expenditures Orissa High Court Upholds Disengagement of Teacher for Unauthorized Absence and Suppression of Facts In Disciplined Forces, Transfers are an Administrative Necessity; Judicial Interference is Limited to Cases of Proven Mala Fide: Patna High Court Act Of Judge, When Free From Oblique Motive, Cannot Be Questioned: Madhya Pradesh High Court Quashes Disciplinary Proceedings Against Additional Collector Registration Act | False Statements in Conveyance Documents Qualify for Prosecution Under Registration Act: Kerala High Court When Junior is Promoted, Senior’s Case Cannot be Deferred Unjustly: Karnataka High Court in Sealed Cover Promotion Dispute Medical Training Standards Cannot Be Lowered, Even for Disability’ in MBBS Admission Case: Delhi HC Suspicion, However Strong It May Be, Cannot Take Place Of Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds Acquittal No Detention Order Can Rely on Grounds Already Quashed: High Court Sets Precedent on Preventive Detention Limits Tenant's Claims of Hardship and Landlord's Alternate Accommodations Insufficient to Prevent Eviction: Allahabad HC Further Custodial Detention May Not Be Necessary: Calcutta High Court Grants Bail in Murder Case Citing Lack of Specific Evidence High Court, As A Constitutional Court Of Record, Possesses The Inherent Power To Correct Its Own Record: Bombay High Court A Fresh Section 11 Arbitration Petition Without Liberty Granted at the Time of Withdrawal is Not Maintainable: Supreme Court; Principles of Order 23 CPC Applied Adult Sexual Predators Ought Not To Be Dealt With Leniency Or Extended Misplaced Sympathy: Sikkim High Court Retired Employee Entitled to Interest on Delayed Leave Encashment Despite Absence of Statutory Provision: Delhi HC Punjab and Haryana High Court Grants Full Disability Pension and Service Element for Life to Army Veteran Taxation Law | Director Must Be Given Notice to Prove Lack of Negligence: Telangana High Court Quashes Order Against Director in Tax Recovery Case High Court of Uttarakhand Acquits Defendants in High-Profile Murder Case, Cites Lack of Evidence In Cases of Financial Distress, Imposing A Mandatory Deposit Under Negotiable Instruments Act May Jeopardize Appellant’s Right To Appeal: Rajasthan High Court Patna High Court Acquits Accused, Questions “Capacity of Victim to Make Coherent Statement” with 100% Burn Injuries High Court of Himachal Pradesh Dismisses Bail Plea in ₹200 Crore Scholarship Scam: Rajdeep Singh Case Execution of Conveyance Ends Arbitration Clause; Appeal for Arbitration Rejected: Bombay High Court

Extra-Judicial Confession Credible and Corroborated by Fingerprint Evidence: Andhra Pradesh High Court in ATM Murder Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The High Court confirms life imprisonment for the accused, emphasizing the reliability of extra-judicial confessions and fingerprint evidence linking the accused to the crime scene.

In a significant judgment, the Andhra Pradesh High Court has upheld the conviction of Kadali Kodandaramu @ Ramu and Velugula Prakash for murder and attempted theft, affirming the trial court’s sentence of life imprisonment and additional rigorous imprisonment. The bench, comprising Justices K. Suresh Reddy and B.V.L.N. Chakravarthi, emphasized the reliability of extra-judicial confessions, the recovery of material objects, and the crucial role of fingerprint evidence in corroborating the presence of the accused at the crime scene.

The case revolves around the brutal murder of Atmakuri Srinivasulu @ Venkata Rao, a security guard at an Axis Bank ATM in Tanuku, and the attempted theft of cash from the ATM on March 10, 2012. The appellants, Kadali Kodandaramu @ Ramu and Velugula Prakash, along with a juvenile accomplice, were found guilty of attacking the deceased and attempting to break into the ATM machine. The trial court convicted them under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC and Section 380 read with Section 511 IPC, leading to life imprisonment and additional sentences.

Credibility of Extra-Judicial Confession:

The High Court upheld the trial court’s reliance on the extra-judicial confession made by the accused to the Village Revenue Officer, P.W-15. Justice B.V.L.N. Chakravarthi noted, “The confession led to the discovery of incriminating material objects, including blood-stained clothes and weapons, which corroborated the confession and linked the accused to the crime.” The court found no reason to disbelieve the Village Revenue Officer’s testimony, despite arguments from the defense that the officer was a stranger to the accused.

Fingerprint Evidence:

Addressing the collection and comparison of fingerprints, the court held that the police were competent to collect the fingerprints of the accused without a Magistrate’s order. The fingerprints collected from the crime scene matched those of the accused, substantiating their presence at the ATM during the crime. “The fingerprints of the accused, collected by the police, matched the chance prints found at the crime scene, leaving no doubt about their involvement,” the bench observed.

The prosecution’s case was further strengthened by the recovery of material objects, including blood-stained clothes and the weapon used in the murder, based on the confessions made by the accused. The forensic examination confirmed the presence of human blood on these items, corroborating the prosecution’s narrative.

Justice Chakravarthi remarked, “The corroboration provided by the material objects and fingerprint evidence is significant and lends credibility to the prosecution’s case, especially in the face of the extra-judicial confessions.”

The High Court’s judgment underscores the judiciary’s commitment to upholding justice through a thorough examination of all available evidence. By affirming the convictions and sentences, the court has reinforced the legal principles surrounding the reliability of extra-judicial confessions and forensic evidence. This judgment is expected to have a lasting impact on the prosecution of similar cases, emphasizing the importance of corroborative evidence in securing convictions.

 

Date of Decision: July 05, 2024

Kadali Kodandaramu @ Ramu & Velugula Prakash vs. State of Andhra Pradesh

Similar News