MACT | Fraud Vitiates All Judicial Acts, Even Without Specific Review Powers: Rajasthan High Court    |     Right of Private Defense Cannot Be Weighed in Golden Scales: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Appellant in Culpable Homicide Case    |     Pre-Arrest Bail Not a Right but an Exception: Himachal High Court Denied Bail In Dowry Death Case"    |     Service Law | Similarly Situated Employees Cannot Be Denied Equal Treatment: PH High Court Orders Regularization    |     Presumption of Innocence Remains Supreme Unless Clearly Overturned: PH High Court Affirming Acquittal    |     Any Physical Liaison with A Girl Of Less Than Eighteen Years Is A Strict Offense.: Patna High Court Reiterates Strict Stance On Sexual Offences Against Minors    |     Orissa High Court Rules Res Judicata Inapplicable When Multiple Appeals Arise from Same Judgment    |     Mandatory Section 80 Notice Cannot Be Bypassed Lightly:  Jammu & Kashmir High Court Returns Plaint for Non-Compliance    |     Bombay High Court Denies Permanent Lecturer Appointment for Failing to Meet UGC Eligibility Criteria at Time of Appointment    |     Deferred Cross-Examination Gave Time for Witness Tampering, Undermining Fair Trial: Allahabad High Court    |     Dowry Death | Presumption Under Section 113-B Not Applicable as No Proof of Cruelty Soon Before Death : Supreme Court    |     Land Acquisition | Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. (JAL) Liable for Compensation under Supplementary Award, Not Ultra-Tech Cement Ltd.: Supreme Court    |     Non-Mentioning of Bail Orders in Detention Reflects Clear Non-Application of Mind: J&K High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order    |     Conviction Under Arms Act and Criminal Conspiracy Quashed Due to Non-Seizure of Key Evidence and Failure to Prove Ownership of Box: Jharkhand High Court    |    

Experience Post-Diploma Declaration Crucial for Eligibility: Delhi High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court, led by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Chandra Dhari Singh, has set a precedent in employment law by emphasizing the importance of post-qualification experience in job eligibility. The court, while dismissing a writ petition challenging the rejection of a candidate’s application for the post of Assistant Electric Fitter at Delhi Transco Limited, clarified that “experience for eligibility purposes must be acquired post the declaration of diploma results.”

The petitioner had approached the ”ourt’after his application was rejected by Delhi Transco Limited. The bone of contention was the overlap of his work experience with his diploma examination period. He contended that his fundamental and legal rights were violated by this rejection.

Justice Singh, in his judgment, observed, “It is settled law…that the completion of a diploma does not relate back to the date of examinations and is said to have been acquired on the date of declaration of final results.” This observation was crucial in determining that the petitioner’s experience prior to his diploma result declaration could not be counted towards the eligibility criteria for the said post.

The ruling drew upon several precedents set by the Supreme Court, notably in cases like Rakesh Kumar Sharma v. State (NCT of Delhi) and Indian Airlines LTD vs. Gopalakrishnan, reinforcing that qualifications are deemed complete upon the official declaration of results.

Justice Singh remarked, “The impugned Rejection Notice issued by the respondent no.2 rejecting the petitioner’s candidature does not suffer from any defects and is not arbitrary and illegal.” This statement underscored the court’s stance on the matter, reinforcing the sanctity of clearly defined eligibility criteria in recruitment processes.

Date of Decision: 15th December, 2023

MANISH KUMAR VS DELHI TRANSCO LIMITED AND ANR

 

Similar News