Even 1.5 Years in Jail Doesn’t Dilute Section 37 NDPS Rigour: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Bail in 710 Kg Poppy Husk Case Stay of Conviction Nullifies Disqualification Under Section 8(3) RP Act: Allahabad High Court Dismisses Quo Warranto Against Rahul Gandhi Custodial Interrogation Necessary to Uncover ₹2 Crore MGNREGA Scam: Kerala High Court Rejects Anticipatory Bail for Vendors in Corruption Case Order 41 Rule 23 CPC | Trial Court Cannot Decide Title Solely on a Vacated Judgment: Himachal Pradesh High Court Strikes By Bar Associations Cannot Stall Justice: Allahabad High Court Holds Office Bearers Liable for Contempt if Revenue Suits Are Delayed Due to Boycotts To Constitute a Service PE, Services Must Be Furnished Within India Through Employees Present in India: Delhi High Court Medical Negligence | State Liable for Loss of Vision in Botched Cataract Surgeries: Gauhati High Court Awards Compensation Waiver of Right Under Section 50 NDPS is Valid Even Without Panch Signatures: Bombay High Court Agricultural Land Is 'Property' Under Hindu Women’s Right to Property Act, 1937: A.P. High Court Tenant Who Pays Rent After Verifying Landlord’s Will Cannot Dispute His Title Under Section 116 Evidence Act: Himachal Pradesh High Court Dismisses Eviction Challenge by HP State Cooperative Bank Clever Drafting Cannot Override Limitation Bar: Gujarat High Court Rejects Suit for Specific Performance Once Divorce by Mutual Consent Is Final, Wife Cannot Pursue Criminal Case for Stridhan Without Reserving Right to Do So: Himachal Pradesh High Court Caste-Based Insults Must Show Intent – Mere Abuse Not Enough for Atrocities Act: Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal Failure to Inform Detenu of Right to Represent to Detaining Authority Vitiates NSA Detention: Gauhati High Court Awarding Further Interest On Penal Charges Is Contrary To Fundamental Policy Of Indian Arbitration Law: Bombay High Court

Every Sale Shall be Stopped if the Debt and Costs are Tendered Before the Auction's Conclusion – High Court of Punjab and Haryana

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana has intervened in the auction of attached land in a case concerning the execution of a decree for compensation following a murder. The court, presided over by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikas Suri, dealt with the revision petition challenging the decision of the Addl. Civil Judge, Ferozepur, regarding the proposed auction sale of land.

The court examined the execution of a decree under the Civil Procedure Code (CPC), specifically focusing on Order 21 Rule 69, which involves the judicial discretion to adjourn or stop a sale.

Satinder Singh, the petitioner, is aggrieved by the order to auction his land, aimed at recovering Rs. 15 lakh as compensation for the death of Kulwant Singh, for which he and others were partly liable. The sale was repeatedly postponed due to various reasons, including lack of bidders and administrative orders during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The court noted that the liability of the petitioner was not joint or several but was to be shared equally among six defendants. The petitioner expressed willingness to deposit the entire decretal amount to halt the auction, claiming that the land's valuation far exceeded the proposed auction price.

Justice Suri referred to Order 21 Rule 69 of the CPC, highlighting that a sale must be stopped if the debt and costs are tendered before the auction's conclusion. This provision aims to give a chance to the judgment debtor to avoid the auction by paying the required amount.

In conclusion, the court directed the petitioner to deposit the decretal amount and costs with the executing court to stop the sale. The scheduled auction on March 18, 2024, was ordered to be kept in abeyance until 4.30 pm of the same day, subject to the executing court's further orders. Additionally, the petitioner was warned of incurring additional costs for non-compliance.

Date of Decision: March 15, 2024

Satinder Singh vs Sukhwant Kaur and Others

Latest Legal News