Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

Every Sale Shall be Stopped if the Debt and Costs are Tendered Before the Auction's Conclusion – High Court of Punjab and Haryana

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana has intervened in the auction of attached land in a case concerning the execution of a decree for compensation following a murder. The court, presided over by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikas Suri, dealt with the revision petition challenging the decision of the Addl. Civil Judge, Ferozepur, regarding the proposed auction sale of land.

The court examined the execution of a decree under the Civil Procedure Code (CPC), specifically focusing on Order 21 Rule 69, which involves the judicial discretion to adjourn or stop a sale.

Satinder Singh, the petitioner, is aggrieved by the order to auction his land, aimed at recovering Rs. 15 lakh as compensation for the death of Kulwant Singh, for which he and others were partly liable. The sale was repeatedly postponed due to various reasons, including lack of bidders and administrative orders during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The court noted that the liability of the petitioner was not joint or several but was to be shared equally among six defendants. The petitioner expressed willingness to deposit the entire decretal amount to halt the auction, claiming that the land's valuation far exceeded the proposed auction price.

Justice Suri referred to Order 21 Rule 69 of the CPC, highlighting that a sale must be stopped if the debt and costs are tendered before the auction's conclusion. This provision aims to give a chance to the judgment debtor to avoid the auction by paying the required amount.

In conclusion, the court directed the petitioner to deposit the decretal amount and costs with the executing court to stop the sale. The scheduled auction on March 18, 2024, was ordered to be kept in abeyance until 4.30 pm of the same day, subject to the executing court's further orders. Additionally, the petitioner was warned of incurring additional costs for non-compliance.

Date of Decision: March 15, 2024

Satinder Singh vs Sukhwant Kaur and Others

Latest Legal News