Supreme Court Strikes Down Expulsion of Bihar MLC as Disproportionate, Orders Immediate Reinstatement Private Banks Not Subject to Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226: Punjab & Haryana High Court Mere Allegation of Forgery is Not Enough: Madhya Pradesh High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Dispute When a Case is Made Out for Bail, Courts Should Not Hesitate: Kerala High Court Allows Bail Despite Commercial Quantity of Drugs Seized Retailers Cannot Be Prosecuted for Manufacturer’s Fault" – Karnataka High Court Quashes Case Against Pesticide Dealers Mere Issuance of a Cheque Does Not Prove Legally Enforceable Debt": Delhi High Court Upholds Acquittal in Cheque Dishonor Case Courts Cannot Ignore Urgent Repairs When Public Safety is at Stake: Calcutta High Court Upholds Trial Court's Order Mutation Entries Do Not Confer Ownership: Bombay High Court Rejects Premature Dismissal of Partition Suit No Substantial Question of Law – High Court Cannot Re-Appreciate Evidence Under Section 100 CPC: Andhra Pradesh High Court Injunction Cannot Be Granted Without Proof of Possession: Allahabad High Court Quashes Relief in Land Dispute Section 197 CrPC | Sanction for Prosecution is a Shield, Not a Sword: Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Case Against BIS Officer Landlord is the Best Judge of His Needs: Supreme Court Orders Eviction in Favor of Landowner Vijaya Bank TT Scam | Supreme Court Acquits Jeweller in ₹6.7 Crore Vijaya Bank Fraud Case, Orders Return of 205 Gold Bars Procurement Preference for Small Enterprises is a Legal Mandate, Not a Mere Policy: Supreme Court Rules in Favor of MSMEs Revisional Jurisdiction Cannot Be Invoked Against Interlocutory Orders of Commercial Courts: Orissa High Court Declares Section 8 Bar Absolute Victim’s Testimony Must Be of Sterling Quality to Be Sole Basis of Conviction: Kerala High Court Reduces Sentence of Pastor Convicted for Repeated Rape of Minor Providing Set-Top Boxes to Subscribers Constitutes Sale”: Karnataka High Court Upholds VAT on Tata Play Limited Mere Registration of FIR Cannot Justify Denial of Passport Renewal: Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court

ESOP Discounts Are Deductible as Business Expenses: ITAT Mumbai Affirms in HDFC Bank Case

30 December 2024 10:07 AM

By: sayum


The tribunal holds that ESOP discounts are allowable as deductions under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, aligning with past judgments and SEBI guidelines. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has ruled in favor of HDFC Bank regarding the deductibility of discounts on Employee Stock Option Plans (ESOPs) as a business expense under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act. This decision affirms the applicability of prior judgments and SEBI guidelines, ensuring consistency in the treatment of ESOP-related expenditures.

HDFC Bank granted stock options to its employees, amortizing the discount amount over the vesting period as per the Securities Exchange Board of India (SEBI) guidelines. The bank claimed this amortization as a revenue expenditure under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act. However, the Assessing Officer and the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) had earlier rejected this claim, categorizing the expense as capital in nature.

The ITAT referred to the Karnataka High Court's decision in CIT vs. Biocon Ltd., which established that discounts on ESOPs are deductible as they aim to secure consistent services from employees rather than waste capital. The tribunal noted, “The primary object of offering ESOPs is not to waste capital but to earn profits by securing consistent services of employees”​​.

The tribunal observed that the deduction of the ESOP discount over the vesting period aligns with the accounting treatment mandated by SEBI guidelines. This consistency in accounting treatment and legal provisions was a crucial factor in the tribunal's decision​​.

In its ruling, the ITAT heavily relied on the precedent set by the Special Bench of ITAT in Biocon Ltd. vs. DCIT and subsequent affirmation by the Karnataka High Court. The tribunal also cited the Delhi High Court's decision in PVR Ltd. vs. CIT, which supported the view that ESOP discounts are a form of employee remuneration and thus deductible as revenue expenditure​​.

The tribunal concluded that the discount on ESOPs should be treated as remuneration to employees for their continuity of service, thus qualifying as a deductible expense under Section 37(1). The ruling emphasized that the expenditure’s nature as a revenue expense is not negated by its association with the procurement of capital assets (i.e., shares), as the underlying purpose is to incentivize and retain employees.

“The discount on issue of ESOPs is an allowable deduction under Section 37(1) as its primary objective is to earn profits by securing consistent services of employees,” noted the tribunal, underscoring the operational purpose of ESOPs over their capital nature​​.

The ITAT's ruling reinforces the judicial stance that ESOP-related discounts are legitimate business expenses under Indian tax law. By aligning its decision with established precedents and regulatory guidelines, the tribunal has provided clarity and consistency for corporations leveraging stock options to retain talent. This decision is expected to influence similar cases and support corporate practices that align employee incentives with business growth objectives.

Date of Decision: 05 July 2024

 

Similar News