Ocular Evidence Prevails Over Medical Findings: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Despite Negative Semen Report & Police Lapses High Court Cannot Pass Inconsistent Orders: Supreme Court Quashes Demolition Order Passed Despite Earlier Restraint In CMDA Regularisation Dispute Supreme Court Upholds Validity Of Open University Degrees Obtained Prior To 2017 Cut-Off Must Be A Polluter Before Being Held Absolutely Liable: Supreme Court Sets Aside NGT Order Against Art Of Living Over Yamuna Event, Orders ₹5 Cr Refund Father Cannot Be Deprived Of Minor's Custody Unless Proved Unfit: Allahabad High Court Hands Over 4-Yr-Old Child To Father, Sets Aside Trial Court Order Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 Integral To Personal Liberty': Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Bail As 24 Witnesses Remain Unexamined No Specific Chemical Opinion That Seized Substance Was Ganja: Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal Under Section 2(iii)(b) NDPS Act Mere Pendency Of Criminal Cases Simplicitor No Ground For Externment': Karnataka High Court Quashes Raichur SDM Order Order VI Rule 16 CPC | Defendants Enjoy Greater Latitude In Altering Defence: Punjab & Haryana High Court Explains Doctrinal Leeway Under CPC Boarding Running Train Not Self-Inflicted Injury: Delhi High Court Sets Aside Order Denying Compensation Possession Of One Co-Sharer Is Possession Of All: J&K&L High Court Cannot Invoke Article 226 For Registering FIR Or Restoring Water Supply: Kerala High Court Natural Guardian's Sale Of Minor's Property Without Court Nod Is Voidable, Extinguishes If Not Challenged Within 3 Years Of Majority: Madras High Court Orissa High Court Rejects Cancer-Survivor Husband's Plea To Transfer Maintenance Case Presumption Of Correctness Of Judicial Records Not Absolute And Can Be Rebutted By Direct Evidence: Kerala High Court on Married Daughter Cannot Challenge Partition After 21-Year Slumber If She Had Knowledge: Madhya Pradesh High Court Kerala High Court Orders Immediate Suspension Of Lakshadweep CJM For Allegedly Forging Witness Deposition To Convict Accused Defect In Served Copy Of Affidavit Not Fatal: Supreme Court Restores Election Petition Challenging Lok Sabha Poll Result, Clarifies Law On Form-25 Attestation

Equal Pay for Equal Work for Temporary Nurses in AIIMS: Delhi High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


On 05 October 2023, In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court has upheld the principle of “equal pay for equal work” for temporary nurses working at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS). The judgment, delivered on October 5, 2023, sets a precedent for ensuring fair compensation to temporary employees who perform duties equivalent to their regular counterparts.

The Hon’ble Justices V. Kameswar Rao and Anoop Kumar Mendiratta delivered the judgment, emphasizing the importance of recognizing the valuable service provided by hospital nurses and the need to ensure equitable compensation.

The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s precedent in the case of Jagjit Singh (2017) 1 SCC 148, which established that employees engaged in similar work cannot be paid less than regular employees. The principle of “equal pay for equal work” applies to all employees, whether engaged on a regular or temporary basis.

The court highlighted the critical role played by nurses In hospitals, stating, “Nurses working in hospitals provide a very valuable humanitarian service; their duties are manifold… It would be a travesty of justice if such people are denied adequate compensation for their services.”

As a result of this judgment, the petitioners, who were temporary nurses at AIIMS, will now be entitled to receive wages at the minimum of the pay scale applicable to regular employees, along with Dearness Allowance. The order also specifies that this entitlement is effective from the date of filing the Original Application (OA), without interest.

The decision comes after a long-standing legal battle, with the High Court setting aside the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, which had dismissed the petitioners’ claims for equal pay.

This ruling not only ensures fair remuneration for temporary nurses but also sets a precedent for similar cases involving temporary employees across various sectors. It underscores the commitment to uphold the dignity and rights of employees engaged in vital roles within organizations.

Representing the petitioners, Ms. Kamlakshi Singh and Ms. Divya Chawla, Advocates, argued passionately for equal pay, citing the Supreme Court’s position on the matter. On the other hand, Mr. Tanveer Oberoi, Advocate for AIIMS, contended that the principle of equal pay should not be translated into a mathematical formula and that the burden of proving parity lies with the employees.

With this judgment, the Delhi High Court has taken a significant step towards ensuring fair wages and equal treatment for temporary employees, setting a precedent for equity in the workplace.

Date of Decision: October 05, 2023

SITA MUNDU & ANR  vs ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL  SCIENCES        

Latest Legal News