Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Equal Pay for Equal Work for Temporary Nurses in AIIMS: Delhi High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


On 05 October 2023, In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court has upheld the principle of “equal pay for equal work” for temporary nurses working at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS). The judgment, delivered on October 5, 2023, sets a precedent for ensuring fair compensation to temporary employees who perform duties equivalent to their regular counterparts.

The Hon’ble Justices V. Kameswar Rao and Anoop Kumar Mendiratta delivered the judgment, emphasizing the importance of recognizing the valuable service provided by hospital nurses and the need to ensure equitable compensation.

The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s precedent in the case of Jagjit Singh (2017) 1 SCC 148, which established that employees engaged in similar work cannot be paid less than regular employees. The principle of “equal pay for equal work” applies to all employees, whether engaged on a regular or temporary basis.

The court highlighted the critical role played by nurses In hospitals, stating, “Nurses working in hospitals provide a very valuable humanitarian service; their duties are manifold… It would be a travesty of justice if such people are denied adequate compensation for their services.”

As a result of this judgment, the petitioners, who were temporary nurses at AIIMS, will now be entitled to receive wages at the minimum of the pay scale applicable to regular employees, along with Dearness Allowance. The order also specifies that this entitlement is effective from the date of filing the Original Application (OA), without interest.

The decision comes after a long-standing legal battle, with the High Court setting aside the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, which had dismissed the petitioners’ claims for equal pay.

This ruling not only ensures fair remuneration for temporary nurses but also sets a precedent for similar cases involving temporary employees across various sectors. It underscores the commitment to uphold the dignity and rights of employees engaged in vital roles within organizations.

Representing the petitioners, Ms. Kamlakshi Singh and Ms. Divya Chawla, Advocates, argued passionately for equal pay, citing the Supreme Court’s position on the matter. On the other hand, Mr. Tanveer Oberoi, Advocate for AIIMS, contended that the principle of equal pay should not be translated into a mathematical formula and that the burden of proving parity lies with the employees.

With this judgment, the Delhi High Court has taken a significant step towards ensuring fair wages and equal treatment for temporary employees, setting a precedent for equity in the workplace.

Date of Decision: October 05, 2023

SITA MUNDU & ANR  vs ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL  SCIENCES        

Latest Legal News