Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Criminal Antecedents Disentitles Accused To Discretionary Relief Of Bail: Orissa High Court Section 311 CrPC | Delay Or Absence Of Examination-In-Chief No Bar To Summon Material Witnesses: Allahabad High Court Revenue Authorities Lack Jurisdiction To Declare Genuineness Of Wills Or Validity Of Settlement Deeds; Parties Must Approach Civil Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court Demand Of Bribe Is Sine Qua Non For Conviction Under PC Act, Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money Not Enough: Bombay High Court 'Promotion Effected Long Ago Not To Be Disturbed': Supreme Court Sets Aside HC Order Quashing 13-Year-Old Promotion; Holds 'Laying Rules' Directory Not Mandatory "Mere Oral Assertion Or 'Data Loss' Letter Not Enough To Prove Driving Licence Validity; Owner Has Strict Duty To Ensure Renewal": Supreme Court Reinstates Insurer's Non-Liability, Applies 'Pay & Recover' Principle "Zero Tolerance To Corruption": Supreme Court Reinstates FIRs Against Karnataka Cops, Slams High Court For 'Mini-Trial' & Exceeding S.482 CrPC Powers ‘Ancillary Services Don't Override Carriage’: Supreme Court Upholds 7.5% Presumptive Income For Cruise Operators Under Section 44B IT Act, Rejects Revenue's Higher Tax Claim Division Bench Refuses To Quash FIR, Holds It Cannot Nullify Single Judge's Final Order Directing Registration Of Case: Allahabad High Court High Court Leave Under Clause XII Doesn't Protect Transferred Suits; Section 16 CPC Strictly Applies To City Civil Court In 'Suits For Land': Bombay High Court Joint Account Holder Who Didn't Sign The Dishonoured Cheque Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 138 NI Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Suits Cannot Be Consolidated If Parties, Properties, And Causes Of Action Are Different: Telangana High Court P&H High Court Halts All Construction In Mohali's Shivalik Foothills Over Failure To Demarcate 'Forest Land', Bars Land Sale No Embargo On Issuing Single Statutory Notice Under Section 138 NI Act For Multiple Dishonoured Cheques: Orissa High Court District Collector Has No Jurisdiction Under CrPC To Order Reopening Of Investigation Or Recall Of Closure Report: Madhya Pradesh High Court No Exclusive Monopoly Over Geographical Term 'Malabar' In Isolation; Protection Limited To Registered Composite Marks: Kerala High Court Person In 'De Facto' Control Is A Promoter Under Companies Act Even If Designated As Professional Director: Karnataka High Court Supreme Court Urges Mandatory Animal Tagging, Strict Enforcement of Gaushala Laws To Tackle Stray Cattle Crisis; Holds Owners Accountable "Don't Render Victims Remediless": Supreme Court Slams High Court For Dismissing Plea Over Stray Bull Death, Awards ₹15 Lakh Compensation Supreme Court Red-Flags 'Unregulated Shadow Work' of Private Investigators, Calls For Legislative Overhaul on Digital Evidence & Privacy Rights 125 CrPC | Wife 'Not Entitled To Interim Maintenance If Adultery Established Ex Facie': Supreme Court Evidence Against Absconder Invalid Without Prior S.299 CrPC Order: SC Acquits Murder Accused Ad Valorem Court Fee Mandatory For Section 54 Appeals Challenging Land Acquisition Awards: Supreme Court

Equal Pay for Equal Work for Temporary Nurses in AIIMS: Delhi High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


On 05 October 2023, In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court has upheld the principle of “equal pay for equal work” for temporary nurses working at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS). The judgment, delivered on October 5, 2023, sets a precedent for ensuring fair compensation to temporary employees who perform duties equivalent to their regular counterparts.

The Hon’ble Justices V. Kameswar Rao and Anoop Kumar Mendiratta delivered the judgment, emphasizing the importance of recognizing the valuable service provided by hospital nurses and the need to ensure equitable compensation.

The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s precedent in the case of Jagjit Singh (2017) 1 SCC 148, which established that employees engaged in similar work cannot be paid less than regular employees. The principle of “equal pay for equal work” applies to all employees, whether engaged on a regular or temporary basis.

The court highlighted the critical role played by nurses In hospitals, stating, “Nurses working in hospitals provide a very valuable humanitarian service; their duties are manifold… It would be a travesty of justice if such people are denied adequate compensation for their services.”

As a result of this judgment, the petitioners, who were temporary nurses at AIIMS, will now be entitled to receive wages at the minimum of the pay scale applicable to regular employees, along with Dearness Allowance. The order also specifies that this entitlement is effective from the date of filing the Original Application (OA), without interest.

The decision comes after a long-standing legal battle, with the High Court setting aside the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, which had dismissed the petitioners’ claims for equal pay.

This ruling not only ensures fair remuneration for temporary nurses but also sets a precedent for similar cases involving temporary employees across various sectors. It underscores the commitment to uphold the dignity and rights of employees engaged in vital roles within organizations.

Representing the petitioners, Ms. Kamlakshi Singh and Ms. Divya Chawla, Advocates, argued passionately for equal pay, citing the Supreme Court’s position on the matter. On the other hand, Mr. Tanveer Oberoi, Advocate for AIIMS, contended that the principle of equal pay should not be translated into a mathematical formula and that the burden of proving parity lies with the employees.

With this judgment, the Delhi High Court has taken a significant step towards ensuring fair wages and equal treatment for temporary employees, setting a precedent for equity in the workplace.

Date of Decision: October 05, 2023

SITA MUNDU & ANR  vs ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL  SCIENCES        

Latest Legal News