Even 1.5 Years in Jail Doesn’t Dilute Section 37 NDPS Rigour: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Bail in 710 Kg Poppy Husk Case Stay of Conviction Nullifies Disqualification Under Section 8(3) RP Act: Allahabad High Court Dismisses Quo Warranto Against Rahul Gandhi Custodial Interrogation Necessary to Uncover ₹2 Crore MGNREGA Scam: Kerala High Court Rejects Anticipatory Bail for Vendors in Corruption Case Order 41 Rule 23 CPC | Trial Court Cannot Decide Title Solely on a Vacated Judgment: Himachal Pradesh High Court Strikes By Bar Associations Cannot Stall Justice: Allahabad High Court Holds Office Bearers Liable for Contempt if Revenue Suits Are Delayed Due to Boycotts To Constitute a Service PE, Services Must Be Furnished Within India Through Employees Present in India: Delhi High Court Medical Negligence | State Liable for Loss of Vision in Botched Cataract Surgeries: Gauhati High Court Awards Compensation Waiver of Right Under Section 50 NDPS is Valid Even Without Panch Signatures: Bombay High Court Agricultural Land Is 'Property' Under Hindu Women’s Right to Property Act, 1937: A.P. High Court Tenant Who Pays Rent After Verifying Landlord’s Will Cannot Dispute His Title Under Section 116 Evidence Act: Himachal Pradesh High Court Dismisses Eviction Challenge by HP State Cooperative Bank Clever Drafting Cannot Override Limitation Bar: Gujarat High Court Rejects Suit for Specific Performance Once Divorce by Mutual Consent Is Final, Wife Cannot Pursue Criminal Case for Stridhan Without Reserving Right to Do So: Himachal Pradesh High Court Caste-Based Insults Must Show Intent – Mere Abuse Not Enough for Atrocities Act: Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal Failure to Inform Detenu of Right to Represent to Detaining Authority Vitiates NSA Detention: Gauhati High Court Awarding Further Interest On Penal Charges Is Contrary To Fundamental Policy Of Indian Arbitration Law: Bombay High Court

Empowers Unorganized Sector Workers: Supreme Court Issues Sweeping Directions for Effective Implementation of POSH Act

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a groundbreaking decision, the Supreme Court of India has issued a set of sweeping directions aimed at ensuring the effective implementation of the Prevention of Sexual Harassment (POSH) Act and Rules, with a particular focus on providing protection to workers in the unorganized sector. The judgment, delivered on October 19, 2023, has far-reaching implications for the rights and safety of employees, especially women, across the country.

The judgment emphasizes the horizontal application of the POSH Act, expanding its scope to include definitions of 'employee,' 'employer,' and 'workplace.' It also highlights the importance of Local Committees (LCs) in the redressal framework for the unorganized sector. LCs are empowered with powers equivalent to a civil court to conduct inquiries, issue summons, and enforce attendance, making them instrumental in addressing cases of sexual harassment.

The Supreme Court acknowledges the role of NGOs in aiding the unorganized sector's workers, making it easier for them to approach LCs. However, it points out a significant limitation in the Act, which depends on the Union Government to disburse funds to the States for the Act's implementation. The Court stresses the need for setting budgets at both district and state levels to ensure the Act's effective execution.

  1. Coordination between Union Government and State/UT Governments: The Women and Child Development Ministry of every State/UT will identify a 'nodal person' to oversee and coordinate matters related to the POSH Act.
  2. Appointment of Public Authorities: District officers must be appointed within four weeks, followed by the appointment of nodal officers and the constitution of LCs.
  3. Amendments and Gaps in Rules: The Union Government is urged to amend the Rules to operationalize Section 26 of the Act and create a 'nodal person' post for uniform implementation.
  4. Training and Capacity Building: Mandatory training is required for District Officers, LCs, and nodal officers.
  5. Larger Efforts Towards Awareness: Allocation of financial resources for awareness material and training programs, identification of NGOs for awareness, and efforts to make LCs more approachable.
  6. Annual Compliance Reports: District Officers must ensure compliance with reporting requirements, and State/UT Governments must create a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for monitoring implementation and maintaining data.
  7. Monitoring of ICs and Compliance by Employers: Directions reiterated for the constitution of Internal Committees (ICs) in various establishments, including hospitals, nursing homes, sports institutes, stadiums, and sports complexes.

This judgment underscores the significance of implementing the POSH Act effectively, especially for the unorganized sector, and sets a clear roadmap for the Union Government, State/UT Governments, and district officers to ensure the Act's provisions are fully realized.

The matter is scheduled for further compliance in the first week of February 2024, marking a significant step towards safeguarding the rights and dignity of workers in the unorganized sector.

Date of Decision: October 19, 2023

INITIATIVES FOR INCLUSION FOUNDATION  vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS. 

Latest Legal News