Supreme Court Lays Down Comprehensive Guidelines To Prevent Misuse Of POCSO Act In Matrimonial Disputes Land Reforms Act | Joint Application For Pre-Emption By Adjoining Landowners Is Maintainable: Calcutta High Court Ocular Evidence In Conflict With Medical Findings Or Withholding Of Natural Witnesses Vitiates Prosecution Case: Allahabad High Court Compassionate Appointment Claim Must Be Decided Based On Policy Prevalent At Time Of Death: Bombay High Court Section 376 IPC | Failure To Prove Initial Dishonest Intent In Marriage Promise Renders Sexual Relationship Consensual: Allahabad High Court Prolonged Incarceration And Delay In Trial Are Valid Grounds To Invoke Constitutional Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 In UAPA Cases: Delhi High Court Motor Vehicles Act | Insurer Liable To Pay And Recover Compensation For Gratuitous Passengers In Goods Vehicles: Gujarat High Court Proof Of Demand And Acceptance Under PC Act Must Be Evaluated Based On Preponderance Of Probabilities In Rebuttal: Kerala High Court Tenancy Claim | Mere Possession Without Lawful Foundation Or Identification Of Tenanted Land Cannot Confer Occupancy Rights: Karnataka High Court 125 CrPC | Maintenance Cannot Be Evaded By Claiming Physical Disability If Conduct Indicates Concealment Of Financial Means: Kerala High Court M.P. Municipal Corporation Act | Locus Standi Under Section 307(5) Limited To Residents Of The Municipal Area: Madhya Pradesh High Court Writ Jurisdiction | Belated Challenge To Disciplinary Action After Superannuation Amounts To Laches; Petition Dismissed: Punjab & Haryana High Court Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC | Mere Pendency Of Partition Suit Does Not Entitle Plaintiff To Injunction Restraining Reconstruction Of Residential Building: Kerala High Court Not A Mere Breach Of Contract: Telangana High Court Refuses To Quash FIR In ₹73 Crore Garment Investment Fraud Section 482 CrPC | High Court Quashes FIR Following Private Compromise In Non-Heinous Dispute Arising From Civil Conflict Mere Involvement In Criminal Case Does Not Constitute Moral Turpitude To Deny Public Appointment: Telangana High Court Pendency Of Investigation Cannot Be A Blanket Ground To Deny Permission For Foreign Travel: Rajasthan High Court Fraudulent Representation By Counsel Vitiates Ex Parte Decree: Punjab & Haryana High Court Holds Professional Misconduct As Evidence Of Fraud Writ Jurisdiction | Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Pending Criminal And Departmental Proceedings Renders Petition Liable To Dismissal: Orissa High Court Banking Fraud | Failure Of Bank Official To Conduct Physical Inspection Of Collateral Property Constitutes Criminal Conspiracy And Abuse Of Official Position: Madras High Court Fraud Vitiates Judicial Proceedings: Judgment Obtained Through Misrepresentation And Conflict Of Interest Cannot Be Sustained, Holds Punjab And Haryana High Court Discovery Under Section 27 Evidence Act From Publicly Accessible Place Requires Caution: Supreme Court Mere Recovery Of Articles At Instance Of Accused Without Independent Corroboration Cannot Sustain Conviction: Supreme Court DNA Profile Must Be Supported By Other Conclusive Evidence To Prove Guilt: Supreme Court

E-Shram portal registration of migrant workers commendable, but ration card issuance remains a concern: SC

03 September 2024 9:56 AM

By: Admin


The Supreme Court's order in M.A. No. 94 of 2022 in SMW(C) No. 6 of 2020 highlighted the efforts undertaken by the Union of India to register migrants/unorganized workers on the eShram portal. The portal provides a Universal Account Number (UAN) to the workers, which will help them in accessing various welfare schemes and benefits offered by the government.

According to the further status report filed by the Union of India, the eShram portal has already registered 28.60 crores migrants/unorganized workers, and out of those, 20.63 crores were also registered on ration card data. The report also stated that approximately 3.82 crores eShram registrants are also found to be beneficiaries under the PM-Kisan Samman Nidhi, and the eligible migrants have been given the benefit of Pradhan Mantri Shram Yogi Mann-Dhan Yojana (PM-SYM).

The court appreciated the efforts made by the Union of India to register migrants/unorganized workers on the eShram portal, but it pointed out that the remaining registrants on eShram, who are still not registered on ration card data and have not been issued ration cards, need to be addressed urgently.

Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, learned ASG appearing on behalf of the Union of India, submitted that each State has its own policies for issuing the ration card, and the concerned State/UT needs to take further steps to issue ration cards to the remaining registrants on eShram.

Shri Prashant Bhushan, learned counsel, pointed out that approximately more than 10 crores persons are deprived of the benefit of the National Food Security Act due to the non-issuance of ration cards, and the census of 2011, which is currently being implemented, does not reflect the population increase after 2011.

The Supreme Court ordered the concerned State/UT to issue ration cards to the left-out registrants on the eShram portal within three months. The State/UT was asked to give wide publicity and approach the remaining registrants through the office of the concerned Collector of the District so that they can be issued ration cards and can get the benefit of the welfare schemes floated by the Union of India and the State Government, including the National Food Security Act. The matter will be put up on October 3, 2023, to enable the Union of India to file a further status report.

In Re Problems and Miseries of Migrant Labourers  vs xxxxxxxxx

Latest Legal News