Rigours of UAPA Melt Before Article 21: Jharkhand High Court Grants Bail After Six Years of Incarceration Accused Cannot Challenge in Arguments What He Never Challenged in Cross-Examination: Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds POCSO Conviction Counterblast Plea, Civil Dispute Defence No Shield When Cognizable Offence Is Disclosed: Allahabad High Court Refuses To Quash FIR Against Ex-Driver Accused Of Outraging Modesty Lawyers Who Burned a Colleague's Furniture for Defending Toll Workers Have Tainted a Noble Profession: Supreme Court A Suspicious Dying Declaration Cannot Hang a Man: Calcutta High Court Sets Aside Murder Conviction IQ of 65, Memory Loss, Frontal Lobe Damage: Supreme Court Holds Brain-Injured Manager Suffered 100% Functional Disability, Enhances Compensation to ₹97.73 Lakh Cannot Be Forced to Pay Gratuity to Retired Employees Who Refuse to Vacate Company Quarters: Supreme Court Victim Who Incited Riot Inside Court Cannot Blame Accused for Trial Delay: Supreme Court Grants Bail in Section 307 Case You Cannot Sell What You Don’t Own: ‘Vendor’s Half Share Means Buyer Gets Only Half’ : Andhra Pradesh High Court Nagaland's Oil Laws Face Constitutional Challenge: Gauhati High Court Sends Union-State Dispute to Supreme Court Order 22 Rule 3 CPC | Will's Validity Cannot Be Decided in Substitution Proceedings: Himachal Pradesh High Court 6-Year-Old Loses Arm To Live 11kV Wire Passing 'Almost Touching' Her Balcony: Punjab & Haryana High Court Awards Rs. 99.93 Lakh To Child Despite Nigam Blaming Father For 'Extending Balcony' Supreme Court Invokes Article 142 To Quash Rape & POCSO Conviction After Marriage Between Accused And Victim NGT Cannot Order Demolition of Temple On Ground of Encroachment of Park: Supreme Court Quashes Removal Order For Want of Jurisdiction Hostile Witnesses & Doubtful Recovery Can Collapse Prosecution: J&K High Court Sets High Threshold for Criminal Proof Compassion Cannot Override the Clock: Karnataka HC Denies Job to Guardian Aunt Despite 2021 Rule Change” Second Marriage During Pendency of Divorce Appeal Is Void: Kerala High Court Appearing in Exam Does Not Cure Attendance Deficiency: MP High Court Upholds 'Year Down' Against BBA Student With Sub-30% Attendance Patna High Court Directs Bihar To Submit Detailed Rehabilitation Plan For Recovered Mental Health Patients, Expand Half-Way Homes Across State Rajasthan High Court Upholds Refusal to Drop Bharat Band Stone-Pelting Case

E-Shram portal registration of migrant workers commendable, but ration card issuance remains a concern: SC

03 September 2024 9:56 AM

By: Admin


The Supreme Court's order in M.A. No. 94 of 2022 in SMW(C) No. 6 of 2020 highlighted the efforts undertaken by the Union of India to register migrants/unorganized workers on the eShram portal. The portal provides a Universal Account Number (UAN) to the workers, which will help them in accessing various welfare schemes and benefits offered by the government.

According to the further status report filed by the Union of India, the eShram portal has already registered 28.60 crores migrants/unorganized workers, and out of those, 20.63 crores were also registered on ration card data. The report also stated that approximately 3.82 crores eShram registrants are also found to be beneficiaries under the PM-Kisan Samman Nidhi, and the eligible migrants have been given the benefit of Pradhan Mantri Shram Yogi Mann-Dhan Yojana (PM-SYM).

The court appreciated the efforts made by the Union of India to register migrants/unorganized workers on the eShram portal, but it pointed out that the remaining registrants on eShram, who are still not registered on ration card data and have not been issued ration cards, need to be addressed urgently.

Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, learned ASG appearing on behalf of the Union of India, submitted that each State has its own policies for issuing the ration card, and the concerned State/UT needs to take further steps to issue ration cards to the remaining registrants on eShram.

Shri Prashant Bhushan, learned counsel, pointed out that approximately more than 10 crores persons are deprived of the benefit of the National Food Security Act due to the non-issuance of ration cards, and the census of 2011, which is currently being implemented, does not reflect the population increase after 2011.

The Supreme Court ordered the concerned State/UT to issue ration cards to the left-out registrants on the eShram portal within three months. The State/UT was asked to give wide publicity and approach the remaining registrants through the office of the concerned Collector of the District so that they can be issued ration cards and can get the benefit of the welfare schemes floated by the Union of India and the State Government, including the National Food Security Act. The matter will be put up on October 3, 2023, to enable the Union of India to file a further status report.

In Re Problems and Miseries of Migrant Labourers  vs xxxxxxxxx

Latest Legal News