Motor Insurance Policy Covers Cross-Border Travel If Specifically Authorized By Valid Permit Under MVA: Supreme Court Petrol Pumps Act As 'Commission Agents' For Mahanagar Gas, Liable To Pay Service Tax Under Business Auxiliary Service: Supreme Court Supreme Court Refuses To Dilute 'Bangalore Water Supply' Ratio, Affirms Worker Protection Remains The Core Of Industrial Disputes Act Order XXII Rule 9(3) CPC | Application Under Section 5 Limitation Act Must Be Filed Separately To Condonate Delay In Setting Aside Abatement: Supreme Court Principle Of Parity | Supreme Court Extends Benefit Of Fixed-Term Sentence To Co-Accused Based On Remission Period Right To Catch Fish Amounts To 'Profit à Prendre' And Is Compulsorily Registrable As A Lease Under Section 17(1)(d) Registration Act: Supreme Court Supreme Court Mandates Adoption Of Guidelines To Inculcate Sensitivity And Compassion In Judicial Processes For Sexual Offences 'Last Seen' Circumstance Is Weak Without Corroboration: Supreme Court Acquits Murder Accused PSEB | Pre-Regularization Service Must Be Counted As Qualifying Service For Pensionary Benefits: Supreme Court Writ Of Quo Warranto Cannot Be Used For Redress Of Personal Grievances By Unsuccessful Candidates In Selection Process: Supreme Court 'Case Of No Investigation': Supreme Court Acquits Murder Accused Citing 'Shoddy' Police Work And Lack Of Forensic Evidence 'Status Quo Cannot Be Vacated Without Appropriate Security': Supreme Court Directs Additional ₹200 Crores Deposit In RAKIA-Matrix Case SARFAESI Act | 'Bank' As Assignee Can Invoke Recovery Measures Even If Debt Was Originally Created By Non-Notified Financial Institution: Supreme Court 'CBI Failed Miserably': Supreme Court Tears Into 'Fabricated' Case, Acquits Bank Manager In 35-Year-Old Corruption Trial Mere Delay In Tax Deposit Cannot Be Equated With Non-Payment: Supreme Court Quashes Penalty On Saudi Arabian Airlines Revisional Power Under Section 56 Karnataka Land Revenue Act Cannot Be Invoked Beyond Three-Year Limitation Period: Supreme Court Prosecution Can’t Use Known Locations To Create 'Discovery' Fiction: Supreme Court Rejects Site Plan As Evidence Irretrievable Breakdown Of Marriage And Long-Term Separation Constitute Valid Grounds For Divorce Under Section 13(1)(ib) HMA: Supreme Court 'Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt Is A Guideline And Not A Fetish': Supreme Court Acquits Man In 2007 Murder Case Over Fragile Circumstantial Evidence Plea Of Juvenility Is A Jurisdictional Fact; High Court Must Recall Final Judgments Under Section 482 CrPC To Remedy Miscarriage Of Justice: Supreme Court SEBI | Professional Clearing Members Have No Statutory Obligation To Verify Credit/Debit Positions Of Individual Clients Of Trading Members: Supreme Court

E-Shram portal registration of migrant workers commendable, but ration card issuance remains a concern: SC

03 September 2024 9:56 AM

By: Admin


The Supreme Court's order in M.A. No. 94 of 2022 in SMW(C) No. 6 of 2020 highlighted the efforts undertaken by the Union of India to register migrants/unorganized workers on the eShram portal. The portal provides a Universal Account Number (UAN) to the workers, which will help them in accessing various welfare schemes and benefits offered by the government.

According to the further status report filed by the Union of India, the eShram portal has already registered 28.60 crores migrants/unorganized workers, and out of those, 20.63 crores were also registered on ration card data. The report also stated that approximately 3.82 crores eShram registrants are also found to be beneficiaries under the PM-Kisan Samman Nidhi, and the eligible migrants have been given the benefit of Pradhan Mantri Shram Yogi Mann-Dhan Yojana (PM-SYM).

The court appreciated the efforts made by the Union of India to register migrants/unorganized workers on the eShram portal, but it pointed out that the remaining registrants on eShram, who are still not registered on ration card data and have not been issued ration cards, need to be addressed urgently.

Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, learned ASG appearing on behalf of the Union of India, submitted that each State has its own policies for issuing the ration card, and the concerned State/UT needs to take further steps to issue ration cards to the remaining registrants on eShram.

Shri Prashant Bhushan, learned counsel, pointed out that approximately more than 10 crores persons are deprived of the benefit of the National Food Security Act due to the non-issuance of ration cards, and the census of 2011, which is currently being implemented, does not reflect the population increase after 2011.

The Supreme Court ordered the concerned State/UT to issue ration cards to the left-out registrants on the eShram portal within three months. The State/UT was asked to give wide publicity and approach the remaining registrants through the office of the concerned Collector of the District so that they can be issued ration cards and can get the benefit of the welfare schemes floated by the Union of India and the State Government, including the National Food Security Act. The matter will be put up on October 3, 2023, to enable the Union of India to file a further status report.

In Re Problems and Miseries of Migrant Labourers  vs xxxxxxxxx

Latest Legal News