Mere Reproduction Of Evidence Can Never Be Equated With Appreciation: Karnataka High Court Quashes Penalty Against Govt Employee Accused Cannot Repeatedly Send Cheque To FSL Till Favourable Report Is Obtained: Kerala High Court In NI Act Case Succession Certificate Cannot Be Issued For Gold Jewels Pledged With Bank, Applies Only To Debts And Securities: Madras High Court Order 11 Rule 14 CPC | Court Cannot Direct Production Of Documents Without Ascertaining They Are In Party's Possession: Calcutta High Court Undertrial Prisoners Don't Suffer 'Civil Death', Retain Fundamental Right To Alienate Property From Jail: Rajasthan High Court Direction For Reasonable Annual Enhancement Of Maintenance Under Section 125 CrPC Merely Preserves Its Real Value Against Inflation: Delhi High Court Testimony Of Sole Interested Witness Must Be Of 'Sterling Quality' To Base Conviction: Patna High Court Acquits Murder Convict Failure To Communicate Written Grounds Of Arrest Renders Arrest Constitutionally Infirm, Accused Entitled To Bail: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 482 CrPC Petition Not Maintainable Against Order Framing Charge Under SC/ST Act, Appeal Lies Under Section 14A: Tripura High Court Disputed Questions Of Fact Regarding Title And Forged Documents Cannot Be Decided Under Article 226: Telangana High Court Matter To Be Enquired By Bar Council: Madhya Pradesh High Court Dismisses Lawyer's PILs With Costs For Suppressing Attorney-Client Relationship BDA Cannot Arbitrarily Reverse Resolutions Passed To Comply With Judicial Directives: Karnataka High Court Section 52A NDPS Act: Mere Non-Compliance Does Not Automatically Vitiate Trial Unless Evidence Is Doubtful: Punjab & Haryana High Court Seniority Must Be Determined From Date Of Substantive Appointment, Not Ad-Hoc Service: Allahabad High Court Uncorroborated Testimony Of Drug Inspector Cannot Form Sole Basis For Conviction Under Drugs Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court Suppression Of Adverse Facts Strikes At Root Of Equitable Jurisdiction: Bombay High Court Denies Injunction In HUF Property Dispute

Dress Code for Advocates Dispensed With Due to Unprecedented Summer Heat: Kerala High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Kerala High Court addressed the issue of the mandatory dress code for advocates in light of the unprecedented summer heat, following a request by the Kerala High Court Advocates' Association. The court resolved to relax the dress code temporarily, recognizing the discomfort caused by high temperatures.

The Kerala High Court Advocates' Association submitted a representation on April 6, 2024, requesting a relaxation in the dress code due to the severe summer conditions. In response, the Full Court held a meeting on April 8, 2024, and passed a resolution regarding the dress code of advocates.

Concerning the Representation: The court noted, "The representation from the Advocates' Association highlighted significant discomfort among the advocate community due to the sweltering heat."

Resolution Details: Explaining the resolution, the judgment states, "It is resolved that advocates appearing in the District Judiciary may wear a white shirt with band, making the use of a black coat and gown optional. For High Court appearances, the gown will be optional."

Duration and Applicability: The court emphasized, "These directions shall be in force with effect from the date of publication of this notice till May 31, 2024."

The Kerala High Court approved the temporary adjustment of the dress code for advocates practicing both in the district judiciary and the High Court, effective immediately until the end of May 2024.`

 

Latest Legal News