Ocular Testimony, Medical Evidence, and Silence of Accused Create a Chain So Complete: Calcutta High Court Upholds Conviction Jurisdiction of Small Causes Court Not Ousted by Convenient Title Disputes: Allahabad High Court Dismisses Revision in Long-Running Eviction Suit Performance Appraisals of Forest Officers Must Remain Within IFS Hierarchy—Violation Contemptuous: Supreme Court “If One Case Was Reconsidered, So Must Be the Other”—Supreme Court Orders Army Chief to Review Denied Promotion of Territorial Army Officer Tenancy Cannot Be Claimed by Partnership Merely Because Business Was Run from Rented Premises: Gujarat High Court If a Person is Last Seen with Deceased, He Must Offer Explanation; Failure to Do So Completes Chain of Circumstances: Bombay High Court Registration Alone Cannot Validate a Will Executed Under Suspicious Circumstances: Allahabad High Court Restores Trial Court Decree Cancelling Will Complaint Need Not Be a “Mantra Recitation”: Supreme Court Clarifies Director’s Criminal Liability Under Section 141 NI Act Advocate Who Poured Acid Must Serve Life—Retired Army Man Gets Sentence Reduced: Supreme Court Delivers Split Relief in Brutal Attack Case Flood Damage Is Not Seepage: Supreme Court Slams Insurance Repudiation, Orders NCDRC to Reassess Compensation NRC Draft Entry No Shield Against Foreigners Tribunal Ruling: Supreme Court Affirms Foreigner Status of Assam Resident Bank Guarantee Is Not Tax Payment—Customs Refund Must Be Released Without Delay: Supreme Court Slams Revenue Over ₹77 Lakh Withholding A Marriage Filled with Emotional Blackmail, Violence, and Relentless Litigation Cannot Be Saved: Orissa High Court Affirms Divorce Decree Privileges of Green Card Holders Are Not Enforceable Rights: Delhi High Court Backs Club's Power to Revoke Facility Access to Overage Dependents Secured Creditors Now Take First Seat: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rules Bank Has Priority Over VAT Dues Under Section 31B of RDB Act Recruitment Rules Cannot Be Altered to Suit Ineligible Candidates After Selection Process Concludes: Rajasthan High Court Quashes Appointments Made Post Cut-Off Revision

District & Sub-Divisional Courts at Amritsar to Function in Restricted Mode From May 9–14: Punjab & Haryana High Court Issues Directions

09 May 2025 4:14 PM

By: Deepak Kumar


“To ensure safety of general public, lawyers, litigants, staff and judicial officers, restricted access and virtual hearings mandated” — Registrar General issues instructions under orders of Hon’ble Chief Justice

In a communication dated 8th May 2025, the Registrar General of the Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh, acting under the directions of the Hon’ble Chief Justice, has announced a restricted mode of functioning for the District Courts at Amritsar and Sub-Divisional Courts at Ajnala. This measure, effective from 09.05.2025 to 14.05.2025, aims to safeguard the health and security of all stakeholders, including litigants, lawyers, staff, and judicial officers.

“The Courts at Headquarters Amritsar and Sub-Divisional Courts at Ajnala be closed temporarily for public entry… and be run in a restricted manner,” the official directive states.

Key Directions
The order lays down comprehensive arrangements to ensure continuity of justice while minimizing public footfall. Importantly, urgent matters such as bail and stay applications will continue to be entertained with prior permission of designated judicial officers.

“Permission be granted for filing of urgent cases only… with prior permission of the District & Sessions Judge, Civil Judge (Sr. Divn), Chief Judicial Magistrate, or SDJM/ACJSD at Ajnala.”
The courts at Sub Division Baba Bakala Sahib will, however, continue functioning as per routine.

Use of Video Conferencing and Digital Filing Mechanisms
Highlighting the shift towards virtual operations, the order authorizes urgent hearings to be conducted via Vidyo, Webex, Lifesize, and, in case of technical issues, alternate platforms such as WhatsApp, Zoom, and Google Duo. It also explicitly permits e-filing and filing via email for urgent matters.
“Permission be granted for hearing of urgent cases through Video Conferencing… The pending cases be adjourned to the next date.”
Moreover, production of accused persons from police/judicial custody shall only be through video conferencing.

Attendance & Administrative Measures
To control the number of individuals physically present: “Only 50% of the staff of each respective Court shall attend duty on rotation basis… The staff not reporting shall work from home and remain available.”

The National Lok Adalat scheduled on 10.05.2025 stands postponed.
The duty magistrates on 10th and 11th May (Saturday and Sunday) are also instructed to function through virtual hearings.

This directive reflects a pragmatic and preventive approach by the High Court administration to strike a balance between access to justice and public health safety in a temporary but critical phase. The High Court has taken care to ensure continuity of urgent legal remedies while safeguarding institutional functionality.
 

Latest Legal News