Limitation For Executing Partition Decree Not Suspended Till Engrossment; Right To Seek Engrossment Subsists During 12-Year Execution Period: Allahabad HC Unilateral Revocation Of Registered Gift Deed Through Sub-Registrar Is Void, Donor Must Approach Civil Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court Mediation Cannot Be Forced Upon Unwilling Party In Civil Suits; Consent Of Both Sides Essential: Bombay High Court Unmarried Daughter Not Entitled To Freedom Fighter Pension If Gainfully Employed At Time Of Father's Death: Calcutta High Court Section 125 CrPC | Maintenance Cannot Be Denied For Lack Of Formal Divorce From First Marriage: Delhi High Court ONGC Cannot Demand Security From Award Holder After Giving ‘No Objection’ To Withdrawal Of Deposited Amount: Andhra Pradesh High Court Sedative Drugs Like Tramadol Impact Mental Fitness Of Declarant; Bombay High Court Acquits Man Relying On Doubtful Dying Declarations Postal Tracking Report Showing 'Refusal' Not Conclusive Proof Of Service If Denied On Oath: Delhi High Court Encroachments Near Military Installations Pose National Security Threat; Remove Illegal Constructions Within Three Months: Rajasthan High Court Punjab & Haryana High Court Directs State To Decide On Legality Of Charging Fees For Downloading FIRs From 'SAANJH' Portal Wife’s Educational Qualifications No Bar To Seeking Maintenance If Actual Employment Is Not Proven: Orissa High Court Mere Telephonic Contact Without Substance Of Conversation Cannot Establish Criminal Conspiracy: Madhya Pradesh High Court Serious Allegations Like HIV/AIDS Imputations Require Corroboration, Cannot Rest Solely On Unsubstantiated Testimony: Karnataka High Court Family Court Cannot Refuse Mutual Consent Divorce Merely Because Parties Are Living Separately 'Without Valid Reason': Kerala High Court Collective Attempts By Advocates To Overbear Presiding Officer Not Protected Professional Conduct: Madras High Court Dismisses Quash Petitions No Legal Evidence Required To Forward A Person To Trial? Rajasthan HC Slams Police For Implicating Accused In NDPS Case Solely On Co-Accused's Statement Accused Must Be Physically Present In Court To Furnish Bonds Under Section 91 BNSS: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Disarticulation Of Limb Entitles Full Functional Disability Recognition For Compensation” Rules Calcutta High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a notable judgment dated May 9, 2024, the Hon’ble Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta of the Calcutta High Court modified the compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Paschim Medinipur, granting enhanced compensation to Joydev Malik, who sustained severe injuries resulting in the amputation of his left leg from the knee following a road mishap on October 20, 2007.

The court centered its decision on the misassessment of the claimant’s permanent disability and income, previously set at 80% by the Tribunal based on a monthly income of Rs. 3,000. The High Court, acknowledging the appellant’s more severe functional disability and the inadequacy of the earlier compensation, recalculated the compensation incorporating future prospects and non-pecuniary losses.

Joydev Malik appealed the Tribunal’s award of Rs. 4,67,800 with 8% interest, contending it underassessed his disability and failed to consider future prospects and non-pecuniary damages. Malik, previously employed as a helper-cum-driver, argued his amputation rendered him completely disabled in terms of his profession, though the Tribunal had accepted only an 80% disability.

Justice Gupta, after reviewing the submissions and precedents, increased the future prospects addition to 40% of the actual income and awarded Rs. 2,00,000 for non-pecuniary damages, such as pain and suffering. The total revised compensation was thereby increased to Rs. 8,04,800. The judgment emphasized that:

The claimant’s functional disability could effectively be considered as 100% due to his inability to continue in his previous employment.

The correct calculation of compensation must include a consideration of future prospects and non-pecuniary losses.

Decision: The court ordered the enhanced compensation amount of Rs. 3,37,000, in addition to the originally awarded Rs. 4,67,800, thus totaling Rs. 8,04,800, which shall carry interest at 6% per annum from the date of the claim till final payment. The respondent, National Insurance Company Limited, is directed to deposit the enhanced amount within eight weeks from the date of judgment.

Date of Decision: May 9, 2024

Joydev Malik versus National Insurance Company Limited and Another

Latest Legal News