Sale Deeds Must Be Interpreted Literally When the Language is Clear and Unambiguous: Supreme Court    |     Non-Signatory Can Be Bound by Arbitration Clause Based on Conduct and Involvement: Supreme Court    |     Right to Passport is a Fundamental Right, Denial Without Justification Violates Article 21: Allahabad High Court    |     Insurance Company's Liability Remains Despite Policy Cancellation Due to Dishonored Cheque: Calcutta High Court    |     Deductions Under Sections 36(1)(vii) and 36(1)(viia) of the Income Tax Act Are Independent and Cannot Be Curtailed: Bombay High Court    |     Diary Entries Cannot Alone Implicate the Accused Without Corroborative Evidence: Supreme Court Upholds Discharge of Accused in Corruption Case    |     MACT | Fraud Vitiates All Judicial Acts, Even Without Specific Review Powers: Rajasthan High Court    |     Right of Private Defense Cannot Be Weighed in Golden Scales: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Appellant in Culpable Homicide Case    |     If Two Reasonable Conclusions Are Possible, Acquittal Should Not Be Disturbed: Supreme Court    |     Kalelkar Award Explicitly Provides Holiday Benefits for Temporary Employees, Not Subject to Government Circulars: Supreme Court Upholds Holiday and Overtime Pay    |     NDPS | Homogeneous Mixing of Bulk Drugs Essential for Valid Sampling Under NDPS Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court    |     Pre-Arrest Bail Not a Right but an Exception: Himachal High Court Denied Bail In Dowry Death Case"    |     POCSO | Scholar Register Is Sufficient to Determine Victim’s Age in POCSO Cases: Madhya Pradesh High Court    |     Abuse of Official Position in Appointments: Prima Facie Case for Criminal Misconduct: Delhi High Court Upholds Framing of Charges Against Swati Maliwal in DCW Corruption Case    |     Service Law | Similarly Situated Employees Cannot Be Denied Equal Treatment: PH High Court Orders Regularization    |     Presumption of Innocence Remains Supreme Unless Clearly Overturned: PH High Court Affirming Acquittal    |     Any Physical Liaison with A Girl Of Less Than Eighteen Years Is A Strict Offense.: Patna High Court Reiterates Strict Stance On Sexual Offences Against Minors    |     Orissa High Court Rules Res Judicata Inapplicable When Multiple Appeals Arise from Same Judgment    |     Mandatory Section 80 Notice Cannot Be Bypassed Lightly:  Jammu & Kashmir High Court Returns Plaint for Non-Compliance    |     Bombay High Court Denies Permanent Lecturer Appointment for Failing to Meet UGC Eligibility Criteria at Time of Appointment    |     Deferred Cross-Examination Gave Time for Witness Tampering, Undermining Fair Trial: Allahabad High Court    |     Dowry Death | Presumption Under Section 113-B Not Applicable as No Proof of Cruelty Soon Before Death : Supreme Court    |     Gift Deed Voided as Son Fails to Care for Elderly Mother, Karnataka High Court Asserts ‘Implied Duty’ in Property Transfers    |     Denial of a legible 164 statement is a denial of a fair trial guaranteed by the Constitution of India: Kerala High Court    |     Safety Shoes Used as Weapon Meets Mens Rea Requirement for Murder: Rajasthan HC on Bail Denial    |     Fraud on the Courts Cannot Be Tolerated: Supreme Court Ordered CBI Investigation Against Advocate    |     Land Acquisition | Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. (JAL) Liable for Compensation under Supplementary Award, Not Ultra-Tech Cement Ltd.: Supreme Court    |     Non-Mentioning of Bail Orders in Detention Reflects Clear Non-Application of Mind: J&K High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order    |     Conviction Under Arms Act and Criminal Conspiracy Quashed Due to Non-Seizure of Key Evidence and Failure to Prove Ownership of Box: Jharkhand High Court    |     Prima Facie Proof of Valid Marriage Required Before Awarding Maintenance Under Section 125 Cr.P.C: Calcutta High Court Sets Aside Interim Maintenance Order    |    

Disarticulation Of Limb Entitles Full Functional Disability Recognition For Compensation” Rules Calcutta High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a notable judgment dated May 9, 2024, the Hon’ble Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta of the Calcutta High Court modified the compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Paschim Medinipur, granting enhanced compensation to Joydev Malik, who sustained severe injuries resulting in the amputation of his left leg from the knee following a road mishap on October 20, 2007.

The court centered its decision on the misassessment of the claimant’s permanent disability and income, previously set at 80% by the Tribunal based on a monthly income of Rs. 3,000. The High Court, acknowledging the appellant’s more severe functional disability and the inadequacy of the earlier compensation, recalculated the compensation incorporating future prospects and non-pecuniary losses.

Joydev Malik appealed the Tribunal’s award of Rs. 4,67,800 with 8% interest, contending it underassessed his disability and failed to consider future prospects and non-pecuniary damages. Malik, previously employed as a helper-cum-driver, argued his amputation rendered him completely disabled in terms of his profession, though the Tribunal had accepted only an 80% disability.

Justice Gupta, after reviewing the submissions and precedents, increased the future prospects addition to 40% of the actual income and awarded Rs. 2,00,000 for non-pecuniary damages, such as pain and suffering. The total revised compensation was thereby increased to Rs. 8,04,800. The judgment emphasized that:

The claimant’s functional disability could effectively be considered as 100% due to his inability to continue in his previous employment.

The correct calculation of compensation must include a consideration of future prospects and non-pecuniary losses.

Decision: The court ordered the enhanced compensation amount of Rs. 3,37,000, in addition to the originally awarded Rs. 4,67,800, thus totaling Rs. 8,04,800, which shall carry interest at 6% per annum from the date of the claim till final payment. The respondent, National Insurance Company Limited, is directed to deposit the enhanced amount within eight weeks from the date of judgment.

Date of Decision: May 9, 2024

Joydev Malik versus National Insurance Company Limited and Another

Similar News