Detailed Description Of Concealment Not Mandatory Under Section 27 Evidence Act: Bombay High Court Upholds Murder Conviction Child Is Not A Pawn To Prove Mother's Adultery: Andhra Pradesh High Court Dismisses Husband's DNA Test Petition In Desertion Divorce Case Shareholder Ratification Cannot Cure Fraud Under SEBI's PFUTP Regulations: Supreme Court Restores Rs. 70 Lakh Penalty on Company When High Court Judges Themselves Disagree on the Answer, Can a Law Graduate Be Penalised for Getting It Wrong? Supreme Court Says No Superficial Burns Don't Mean Silence: Supreme Court Explains Why 80-90% Burn Victim Could Still Make a Valid Dying Declaration Daughter's Eyewitness Account, Dying Declaration Seal Husband's Fate: Supreme Court Upholds Life Sentence for Wife-Burning Murder Supreme Court Rejects Rs. 106 Crore Compensation Claim; Directs SECL to Supply Coal to Prakash Industries at 2014 or 2019 Prices for Wrongfully Suspended Period Section 319 CrPC | Trial Court Cannot Conduct Mini Trial While Deciding Application to Summon Additional Accused: Supreme Court Accused Can't Be Left Without Documents To Defend: Calcutta High Court Directs Adjudicating Authority To First Decide Whether Complete 'Relied Upon Documents' Were Served In PMLA Proceedings Husband Who Took Voluntary Retirement at 47 Cannot Escape Maintenance Duty: Delhi High Court Upholds ₹10,000/Month to Wife and Daughter Cannot Claim Monopoly Over a Deity's Name: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Trademark Injunction Against 'Kshetrapal Construction' Eviction Appeal Cannot Require Actual Surrender Of Possession, Symbolic Possession Sufficient: J&K High Court Amendment Introducing Time-Barred Relief And Changing Nature Of Suit Cannot Be Allowed: Karnataka High Court Counter Claim Is An Independent Suit: MP High Court Rules Properties Beyond Territorial Jurisdiction Cannot Be Dragged Into Counter Claim Co-Sharer Cannot Be Bound By Passage Carved Out Without His Consent: Punjab & Haryana High Court Modifies Concurrent Decrees ‘Prima Facie True’ Is Enough to Deny Liberty: Punjab & Haryana High Court Refuses Bail in Babbar Khalsa Terror Conspiracy Case High Court Cannot Quash FIR for Forgery When Handwriting Expert's Report Is Still Awaited: Supreme Court Supreme Court Calls for Paternity Leave Law, Says Father's Absence in Child's Early Years Leaves a "Quiet Cost" That Lasts a Lifetime Three-Month Age Cap for Adoptive Mothers' Maternity Benefit Struck Down: Supreme Court Reads Down Section 60(4) of Social Security Code Bank Cannot Rely on Charter Party Agreement to Justify Remittance Contrary to Customer's Instructions: Supreme Court 19 Candidates Linked to Accused, Papers of Five Subjects Leaked: Allahabad High Court Upholds Cancellation of UP Assistant Professor Exam Result

Disarticulation Of Limb Entitles Full Functional Disability Recognition For Compensation” Rules Calcutta High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a notable judgment dated May 9, 2024, the Hon’ble Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta of the Calcutta High Court modified the compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Paschim Medinipur, granting enhanced compensation to Joydev Malik, who sustained severe injuries resulting in the amputation of his left leg from the knee following a road mishap on October 20, 2007.

The court centered its decision on the misassessment of the claimant’s permanent disability and income, previously set at 80% by the Tribunal based on a monthly income of Rs. 3,000. The High Court, acknowledging the appellant’s more severe functional disability and the inadequacy of the earlier compensation, recalculated the compensation incorporating future prospects and non-pecuniary losses.

Joydev Malik appealed the Tribunal’s award of Rs. 4,67,800 with 8% interest, contending it underassessed his disability and failed to consider future prospects and non-pecuniary damages. Malik, previously employed as a helper-cum-driver, argued his amputation rendered him completely disabled in terms of his profession, though the Tribunal had accepted only an 80% disability.

Justice Gupta, after reviewing the submissions and precedents, increased the future prospects addition to 40% of the actual income and awarded Rs. 2,00,000 for non-pecuniary damages, such as pain and suffering. The total revised compensation was thereby increased to Rs. 8,04,800. The judgment emphasized that:

The claimant’s functional disability could effectively be considered as 100% due to his inability to continue in his previous employment.

The correct calculation of compensation must include a consideration of future prospects and non-pecuniary losses.

Decision: The court ordered the enhanced compensation amount of Rs. 3,37,000, in addition to the originally awarded Rs. 4,67,800, thus totaling Rs. 8,04,800, which shall carry interest at 6% per annum from the date of the claim till final payment. The respondent, National Insurance Company Limited, is directed to deposit the enhanced amount within eight weeks from the date of judgment.

Date of Decision: May 9, 2024

Joydev Malik versus National Insurance Company Limited and Another

Latest Legal News