IT Act | Ambiguity in statutory notices undermines the principles of natural justice: Delhi High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeals Gauhati High Court Upholds Conviction Under NDPS Act: Procedural Lapses Insufficient to Overturn Case Himachal Pradesh High Court Acquits Murder Accused, Points to Possible Suicide Pact in "Tragic Love Affair" Tampering With Historical Documents To Support A Caste Claim Strikes At The Root Of Public Trust And Cannot Be Tolerated: Bombay High Court Offense Impacts Society as a Whole: Madras High Court Denies Bail in Cyber Harassment Case Custody disputes must be resolved in appropriate forums, and courts cannot intervene beyond legal frameworks in the guise of habeas corpus jurisdiction: Kerala High Court Insubordination Is A Contagious Malady In Any Employment And More So In Public Service : Karnataka High Court imposes Rs. 10,000 fine on Tribunal staff for frivolous petition A Show Cause Notice Issued Without Jurisdiction Cannot Withstand Judicial Scrutiny: AP High Court Sets Aside Rs. 75 Lakh Stamp Duty Demand Timely Action is Key: P&H HC Upholds Lawful Retirement at 58 for Class-III Employees Limitation | Litigants Cannot Entirely Blame Advocates for Procedural Delays: Supreme Court Family's Criminal Past Cannot Dictate Passport Eligibility: Madhya Pradesh High Court Double Presumption of Innocence Bolsters Acquittal When Evidence Falls Short: Calcutta High Court Upholds Essential Commodities Act TIP Not Mandatory if Witness Testimony  Credible - Recovery of Weapon Not Essential for Conviction Under Section 397 IPC: Delhi High Court University’s Failure to Amend Statutes for EWS Reservation Renders Advertisement Unsustainable: High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh Quashes EWS Reservation in University Recruitment Process

Direct Witness Testimony Overpowers Contradictions: Patna High Court Upholds Conviction in Beur Murder Case

04 October 2024 2:26 PM

By: sayum


Patna High Court dismissed the appeals of six individuals convicted for the 2016 murder of businessman Ramchandra Jha in Beur, Patna. The court upheld the life imprisonment sentences of Bhola Kumar, Ranjeet Kumar @ Bittu, Ranjan Kumar, Santosh Kumar, Ajay Kumar, Bhavya Prakash, and Vikky Kumar, who were found guilty of criminal conspiracy and murder under Sections 120B and 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), along with related charges under the Arms Act.

The prosecution successfully proved that the convicts had conspired to kill Ramchandra Jha due to a business rivalry, and the court rejected the defense's claims of false implication.

The case originated from the murder of Ramchandra Jha on 12th September 2016, when he was shot multiple times while returning home. His wife, Jayanti Jha (PW-1), and their son, Rajan Chandra Jha (PW-6), were presented as key eyewitnesses who testified that they saw the appellants commit the crime.

The prosecution presented a detailed motive, pointing to a business dispute between the victim and the accused, particularly Ranjeet Kumar and Ranjan Kumar, who had earlier threatened Jha over a partnership in a marble business.

Witness Reliability: The defense argued that the testimonies of Jayanti Jha and Rajan Chandra Jha were unreliable, citing contradictions and delays in filing the FIR.

Delay in FIR: The defense questioned the 15-hour delay in filing the FIR, suggesting that it was manipulated to implicate the accused due to previous enmities.

Alibi Defense: Several appellants claimed they were not present at the scene, presenting an alibi during their defense.

The court upheld the findings of the trial court, emphasizing the credibility of the eyewitnesses, despite minor contradictions. The court noted:

The testimonies of PW-1 and PW-6 were consistent regarding the events of the murder, and the delay in FIR was sufficiently explained by the emotional distress of the informant, who lost her husband.

The alibi defense was rejected as the appellants failed to present strong evidence supporting their claims.

The court also dismissed concerns about the lack of independent witnesses, noting that the prosecution's case can stand on the basis of family testimony alone if credible.

The Patna High Court confirmed the life imprisonment sentences for Bhola Kumar and the other appellants, rejecting all appeals and affirming the convictions for conspiracy and murder.

Date of Decision: 30th September 2024

Bhola Kumar vs. The State of Bihar

Similar News