Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Delhi High Court Upholds Citizen’s Right to Information, Overturns CIC’s Restriction on RTI Queries

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment the Delhi High Court has set aside a directive of the Central Information Commission (CIC) that barred petitioner Shishir Chand from filing further Right to Information (RTI) applications on the same subject matter. This ruling reaffirms the citizen’s unfettered right to seek information under the RTI Act, 2005.

Justice Subramonium Prasad, while delivering the verdict, emphasized the essence of the RTI Act. “The RTI Act provides for payment of costs by public authority if any loss is caused… There is no provision for imposing costs if information is sought repeatedly,” he observed, underscoring the Act’s intent to enable greater access to information for citizens.

The case, W.P.© 11820/2021 & CM APPLs. 38010/2022, 38023/2022, 46873/2023, revolved around the petitioner’s quest for information regarding the alleged medical negligence that led to his brother’s death. Despite multiple RTI applications and legal pursuits across various forums, the CIC had restricted Chand from making further inquiries on the grounds of repetitive requests, terming it as an abuse of the RTI process.

The High Court recognized the CIC's concerns about potential misuse of the RTI Act, but maintained that such concerns should not impede the fundamental right to information. “The purpose of the RTI Act is meant to further good governance, and unfortunate misuse of the same will only dilute its importance,” Justice Prasad noted in his judgment.

This landmark decision is seen as a reinforcement of the RTI Act’s core objective of ensuring transparency and accountability in governance. The Court’s ruling, particularly in setting aside the CIC’s directive, serves as a reminder of the legal framework’s commitment to uphold citizens’ rights to information.

The Court, however, advised the petitioner and others to refrain from abusing the law and diluting the Act’s objectives by seeking the same information repetitively.

Date of Decision: 19th December, 2023

SHISHIR CHAND VS THE CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION & ANR.

 

Latest Legal News