Employees Cannot Pick Favourable Terms and Reject the Rest: Bombay High Court Upholds SIDBI’s Cut-Off Date for Pension to CPF Optees Rules of the Game Were Never Changed: Delhi High Court Upholds CSIR’s Power to Prescribe Minimum Threshold in CASE-2023 Resignation Does Not Forfeit Earned Pension: Calcutta High Court Declares Company Superannuation Benefit as ‘Wages’ Under Law Fraud Vitiates Everything—Stranger Can File Independent Suit Against Compromise Decree: Bombay High Court Refuses to Reject 49-Year-Old Challenge at Threshold Mere Long Possession By One Co-Owner Does Not Destroy The Co-Ownership Right Of The Other: Madras High Court State Cannot Hide Behind An Illegal Undertaking: Punjab & Haryana High Court Questions Denial Of Retrospective Regularization Article 21-A Cannot Be Held Hostage to Transfer Preferences: Allahabad High Court Upholds Teacher Redeployment to Enforce Pupil–Teacher Ratio Arbitrator Cannot Rewrite Contract Or Travel Beyond Pleadings: Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes ₹5.18 Crore Award Director’ in GeM Clause 29 Does Not Mean ‘Independent Director’: Gujarat High Court Sets Aside Technical Disqualification Section 25(3) Is Sacrosanct – Removal of a Trademark Cannot Rest on a Defective Notice: Delhi High Court Not Every Broken Promise Is Rape: Delhi High Court Draws Clear Line Between ‘Suspicion’ and ‘Grave Suspicion’ in False Promise to Marry Case Section 37 Is Not A Second Appeal On Merits: Delhi High Court Refuses To Re-Appreciate Evidence In Challenge To Arbitral Award Recovery After Retirement Is Clearly Impermissible: Bombay High Court Shields Retired Teacher From ₹2.80 Lakh Salary Recovery Paying Tax Does Not Legalise Illegality: Bombay High Court Refuses to Shield Alleged Unauthorized Structure Beneficial Pension Scheme Cannot Be Defeated By Cut-Off Dates: Andhra Pradesh High Court Directs EPFO To Follow Sunil Kumar B. Guidelines On Higher Pension Claims Equity Aids the Vigilant, Not Those Who Sleep Over Their Rights: Punjab & Haryana High Court Refuses to Revive 36-Year-Old Pay Parity Claim Students Cannot Be Penalised For Legislative Invalidity: Supreme Court Protects Degrees Granted Before 2005 Yash Pal Verdict Restructuring Without Fulfilment of Conditions Cannot Defeat Insolvency: Supreme Court Reaffirms Default as the Sole Trigger Under Section 7 IBC Section 100-A CPC Slams The Door On Intra-Court Appeals In RERA Matters”: Allahabad High Court Declares Special Appeal Not Maintainable Mental Distance Between ‘May Be’ and ‘Must Be’ Is Long: Patna High Court Acquits Six in Murder Case Built on Broken Chain of Circumstances Where Corruption Takes Roots, Rule of Law Is Replaced by Rule of Transaction: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Bail to DIG Harcharan Singh Bhullar Mere Voter List and Corrected SSC Certificate Cannot Prove Paternity: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects 21-Year-Old Bid for DNA Test in Partition Appeal Section 147 NI Act Makes Offence Compoundable At Any Stage: Karnataka High Court Sets Aside Concurrent Convictions in Cheque Bounce Case After Settlement Bald Allegations of Adultery Based on Suspicion Cannot Dissolve a Marriage: Jharkhand High Court Once a Document Is Admitted in Evidence, Its Stamp Defect Cannot Be Reopened: Madras High Court

Delhi High Court Upholds Citizen’s Right to Information, Overturns CIC’s Restriction on RTI Queries

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment the Delhi High Court has set aside a directive of the Central Information Commission (CIC) that barred petitioner Shishir Chand from filing further Right to Information (RTI) applications on the same subject matter. This ruling reaffirms the citizen’s unfettered right to seek information under the RTI Act, 2005.

Justice Subramonium Prasad, while delivering the verdict, emphasized the essence of the RTI Act. “The RTI Act provides for payment of costs by public authority if any loss is caused… There is no provision for imposing costs if information is sought repeatedly,” he observed, underscoring the Act’s intent to enable greater access to information for citizens.

The case, W.P.© 11820/2021 & CM APPLs. 38010/2022, 38023/2022, 46873/2023, revolved around the petitioner’s quest for information regarding the alleged medical negligence that led to his brother’s death. Despite multiple RTI applications and legal pursuits across various forums, the CIC had restricted Chand from making further inquiries on the grounds of repetitive requests, terming it as an abuse of the RTI process.

The High Court recognized the CIC's concerns about potential misuse of the RTI Act, but maintained that such concerns should not impede the fundamental right to information. “The purpose of the RTI Act is meant to further good governance, and unfortunate misuse of the same will only dilute its importance,” Justice Prasad noted in his judgment.

This landmark decision is seen as a reinforcement of the RTI Act’s core objective of ensuring transparency and accountability in governance. The Court’s ruling, particularly in setting aside the CIC’s directive, serves as a reminder of the legal framework’s commitment to uphold citizens’ rights to information.

The Court, however, advised the petitioner and others to refrain from abusing the law and diluting the Act’s objectives by seeking the same information repetitively.

Date of Decision: 19th December, 2023

SHISHIR CHAND VS THE CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION & ANR.

 

Latest Legal News