Victim Has Locus To Request Court To Summon Witnesses Under Section 311 CrPC In State Prosecution: Allahabad High Court Order 2 Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Ground to Reject a Plaint: Supreme Court Draws Crucial Distinction Between Bar to Sue and Bar by Law No Right to Lawyer Before Advisory Board in Preventive Detention — Unless Government Appears Through Legal Practitioner: Supreme Court Wife's Dowry Statement Cannot Be Used to Prosecute Her for 'Giving' Dowry: Supreme Court Upholds Section 7(3) Shield Husband's Loan Repayments Cannot Reduce Wife's Maintenance: Supreme Court Raises Amount to ₹25,000 From ₹15,000 Prisoners Don't Surrender Their Rights at the Prison Gate: Supreme Court Issues Binding SOP to End Delays in Legal Aid Appeals A Judgment Must Be a Self-Contained Document Even When Defendant Never Appears: Supreme Court on Ex Parte Decrees Court Cannot Dismiss Ex Parte Suit on Unpleaded, Unframed Issue: Supreme Court Sets Aside Specific Performance Decree Denied on Title Erroneous High Court Observations Cannot Be Used to Stake Property Claims: Supreme Court Steps In to Prevent Misuse of Judicial Observations No Criminal Proceedings Would Have Been Initiated Had Financial Settlement Succeeded: Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail In Rape Case Directors Cannot Escape Pollution Law Prosecution by Claiming Ignorance: Allahabad High Court Refuses to Quash Summons Against Company Directors Order 7 Rule 11 CPC | Court Cannot Peek Into Defence While Rejecting Plaint: Delhi High Court Death 3½ Months After Accident Doesn't Break Causal Link If Doctors Testify Injuries Could Cause Death: Andhra Pradesh High Court LLB Intern Posed as Supreme Court Advocate, Used Fake Bar Council Card and Police Station Seals to Defraud Victims of Rs. 80 Lakhs: Gujarat High Court Rejects Anticipatory Bail Husband Who Travels to Wife's City on Leave, Cohabits With Her, Then Claims She 'Never Lived With Him' Cannot Prove Cruelty: Jharkhand High Court Liquor Licence Is a State Privilege, Not a Citizen's Right — No Vested Right of Renewal Survives a Change in Rules: Karnataka High Court Sets Aside Stay on E-Auction Policy Court Holiday Cannot Save Prosecution From Default Bail: MP High Court No Search At Your Premises, No Incriminating Document, No Case: Rajasthan HC Quashes Rs. 18 Crore Tax Assessment Under Section 153C Limitation Act | Litigant Cannot Be Punished For Court's Own Docket Load: J&K High Court

Delhi High Court Upholds Citizen’s Right to Information, Overturns CIC’s Restriction on RTI Queries

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment the Delhi High Court has set aside a directive of the Central Information Commission (CIC) that barred petitioner Shishir Chand from filing further Right to Information (RTI) applications on the same subject matter. This ruling reaffirms the citizen’s unfettered right to seek information under the RTI Act, 2005.

Justice Subramonium Prasad, while delivering the verdict, emphasized the essence of the RTI Act. “The RTI Act provides for payment of costs by public authority if any loss is caused… There is no provision for imposing costs if information is sought repeatedly,” he observed, underscoring the Act’s intent to enable greater access to information for citizens.

The case, W.P.© 11820/2021 & CM APPLs. 38010/2022, 38023/2022, 46873/2023, revolved around the petitioner’s quest for information regarding the alleged medical negligence that led to his brother’s death. Despite multiple RTI applications and legal pursuits across various forums, the CIC had restricted Chand from making further inquiries on the grounds of repetitive requests, terming it as an abuse of the RTI process.

The High Court recognized the CIC's concerns about potential misuse of the RTI Act, but maintained that such concerns should not impede the fundamental right to information. “The purpose of the RTI Act is meant to further good governance, and unfortunate misuse of the same will only dilute its importance,” Justice Prasad noted in his judgment.

This landmark decision is seen as a reinforcement of the RTI Act’s core objective of ensuring transparency and accountability in governance. The Court’s ruling, particularly in setting aside the CIC’s directive, serves as a reminder of the legal framework’s commitment to uphold citizens’ rights to information.

The Court, however, advised the petitioner and others to refrain from abusing the law and diluting the Act’s objectives by seeking the same information repetitively.

Date of Decision: 19th December, 2023

SHISHIR CHAND VS THE CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION & ANR.

 

Latest Legal News