Safety Shoes Used as Weapon Meets Mens Rea Requirement for Murder: Rajasthan HC on Bail Denial    |     Right to Be Considered for Promotion, Not a Right to Promotion: Supreme Court Clarifies Eligibility for Retrospective Promotion    |     Inherent Power of Courts Can Recall Admission of Insufficiently Stamped Documents: Supreme Court    |     Courts Cannot Substitute Their Opinion for Security Agencies in Threat Perception Assessments: J&K High Court Directs Reassessment of Political Leader's Threat Perception    |     Service Law | Violation of Natural Justice: Discharge Without Notice or Reason: Gauhati High Court Orders Reinstatement and Regularization of Circle Organizers    |     Jharkhand High Court Quashes Family Court Order, Reaffirms Jurisdiction Based on Minor’s Ordinary Residence in Delhi    |     Ex-Serviceman Status Ceases After First Employment in Government Job: Calcutta High Court Upholds SBI’s Cancellation of Ex-Serviceman's Appointment Over False Declaration of Employment    |     Maxim Res Ipsa Loquitur Applies When State Instrumentalities Are Directly Responsible: Delhi High Court Orders MCD to Pay ₹10 Lakhs Compensation for Death    |     Wilful Avoidance of Service Must Be Established Before Passing Ex Parte Order Under Section 126(2) CrPC: Patna High Court Sets Aside Ex Parte Maintenance Order    |     MP High Court Imposes Rs. 10,000 Costs for Prolonging Litigation, Upholds Eviction of Petitioners from Father's Property    |     When Detention Unnecessary Despite Serious Allegations of Fraud Bail Should be Granted: Kerala HC    |     Magistrate's Direction for Police Inquiry Under Section 202 CrPC Is Valid; Petitioner Must Await Investigation Outcome: Bombay High Court Dismisses Advocate's Petition as Premature    |     Relocation Alone Cannot Justify Transfer: Supreme Court Rejects Plea to Move Case from Nellore to Delhi, Orders Fresh Probe    |     Punjab & Haryana HC Double Bench Upholds Protection for Married Partners in Live-In Relationships, Denies Same for Minors    |    

Delhi High Court Upholds Citizen’s Right to Information, Overturns CIC’s Restriction on RTI Queries

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment the Delhi High Court has set aside a directive of the Central Information Commission (CIC) that barred petitioner Shishir Chand from filing further Right to Information (RTI) applications on the same subject matter. This ruling reaffirms the citizen’s unfettered right to seek information under the RTI Act, 2005.

Justice Subramonium Prasad, while delivering the verdict, emphasized the essence of the RTI Act. “The RTI Act provides for payment of costs by public authority if any loss is caused… There is no provision for imposing costs if information is sought repeatedly,” he observed, underscoring the Act’s intent to enable greater access to information for citizens.

The case, W.P.© 11820/2021 & CM APPLs. 38010/2022, 38023/2022, 46873/2023, revolved around the petitioner’s quest for information regarding the alleged medical negligence that led to his brother’s death. Despite multiple RTI applications and legal pursuits across various forums, the CIC had restricted Chand from making further inquiries on the grounds of repetitive requests, terming it as an abuse of the RTI process.

The High Court recognized the CIC's concerns about potential misuse of the RTI Act, but maintained that such concerns should not impede the fundamental right to information. “The purpose of the RTI Act is meant to further good governance, and unfortunate misuse of the same will only dilute its importance,” Justice Prasad noted in his judgment.

This landmark decision is seen as a reinforcement of the RTI Act’s core objective of ensuring transparency and accountability in governance. The Court’s ruling, particularly in setting aside the CIC’s directive, serves as a reminder of the legal framework’s commitment to uphold citizens’ rights to information.

The Court, however, advised the petitioner and others to refrain from abusing the law and diluting the Act’s objectives by seeking the same information repetitively.

Date of Decision: 19th December, 2023

SHISHIR CHAND VS THE CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION & ANR.

 

Similar News