Limitation Act | Litigant Cannot Be Punished For Court's Own Docket Load: J&K High Court Illicit Affair Alone Cannot Make a Man Guilty of Abetting Suicide: Supreme Court Quashes Charge Under Section 306 IPC Landlord Cannot Be Punished for Slowness of Courts: Supreme Court on Bonafide Need in Eviction Suits Expect States To Enact Laws Regulating Unlicensed Money Lenders Charging Exorbitant Interest Contrary To 'Damdupat': Supreme Court Accused Who Skips Lok Adalat After Seeking It, Then Cries 'Prejudice', Cannot Claim Apprehension of Denial of Justice: Madras High Court Refuse To Transfer Case IO Cannot Act Without Prior Sanction: Gujarat High Court Grants Bail, Flags Procedural Lapse in Religious Conversion Case Electricity Board Strictly Liable For Unprotected Transformer, 7-Year-Old Cannot Be Guilty Of Contributory Negligence: Allahabad High Court POCSO Conviction Can't Stand For Offence Not Charged: Delhi High Court Member of Unlawful Assembly Cannot Escape Conviction By Claiming He Only Carried a Lathi and Struck No One: Allahabad High Court Jurisdiction Cannot Be Founded On Casual Or Incidental Facts If Not Have A Direct Nexus With The Lis: : Delhi High Court Clause Stating Disputes "Can" Be Settled By Arbitration Is Not A Binding Arbitration Agreement: Supreme Court State Cannot Plead Helplessness Against Sand Mafia; Supreme Court Warns Of Paramilitary Deployment, Complete Mining Ban In MP & Rajasthan Authority Cannot Withdraw Subsidy Citing Non-Compliance When It Ignored Repeated Requests For Inspection: Supreme Court Out-of-State SC/ST/OBC Candidates Cannot Claim Rajasthan's Reservation Benefits in NEET PG Counselling: Rajasthan High Court Supreme Court Upholds Haryana's Regularisation Of Qualified Ad Hoc Staff As 'One-Time Measure', Strikes Down Futuristic Cut-Offs

Delhi High Court Dismisses Appeals Alleging Collusion in Bidding Process

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Delhi, India – In a recent judgment, the Delhi High Court dismissed appeals filed by NTPC Ltd, a leading power company, alleging collusion in the bidding process. The court ruled that the allegations of collusion between Emami Power Ltd and Oriental Sales Agencies (India) were baseless and lacked evidence. The judgment, delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Najmi Waziri and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sudhir Kumar Jain, emphasized the need for concrete proof to establish collusion.

The court stated, "The Impugned order has rightly held, indeed it was conceded by the appellant, that Emami and OSAPL were not group companies; there was nothing on the record to establish that the two companies which are otherwise independent and separate entities, could be said to have colluded or otherwise conspired to cause any monetary loss or injury or impediment in the affairs of the appellant.”

Furthermore, the court rejected the appellant’s contention that Emami and OSAPL had caused harm to NTPC Ltd, as no loss was proven to have been suffered by the appellant. The appeals were dismissed, and the court ordered the release of the deposited monies to Emami Power Ltd and Oriental Sales Agencies (India) along with any accrued interest.

Highlighting the interpretation of the Request for Selection (RFS), the court noted, “The impugned order has rightly held that Emami and OSAPL are not group companies… The shareholding pattern and economic interests are irrelevant once non-affiliation is established.”

The judgment emphasized the importance of evidence and pleadings to support allegations, stating, “There are no pleadings to support the contentions… these contentions are wholly bereft of any merit.”

Decided on: 12.05.2023

NTPC LTD  VS  EMAMI POWER LTD & ANR             

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/NTPCL-VS-EMAMI-POWER-12-MAY-DHC.pdf"]

Latest Legal News