Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Delhi High Court Dismisses Appeals Alleging Collusion in Bidding Process

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Delhi, India – In a recent judgment, the Delhi High Court dismissed appeals filed by NTPC Ltd, a leading power company, alleging collusion in the bidding process. The court ruled that the allegations of collusion between Emami Power Ltd and Oriental Sales Agencies (India) were baseless and lacked evidence. The judgment, delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Najmi Waziri and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sudhir Kumar Jain, emphasized the need for concrete proof to establish collusion.

The court stated, "The Impugned order has rightly held, indeed it was conceded by the appellant, that Emami and OSAPL were not group companies; there was nothing on the record to establish that the two companies which are otherwise independent and separate entities, could be said to have colluded or otherwise conspired to cause any monetary loss or injury or impediment in the affairs of the appellant.”

Furthermore, the court rejected the appellant’s contention that Emami and OSAPL had caused harm to NTPC Ltd, as no loss was proven to have been suffered by the appellant. The appeals were dismissed, and the court ordered the release of the deposited monies to Emami Power Ltd and Oriental Sales Agencies (India) along with any accrued interest.

Highlighting the interpretation of the Request for Selection (RFS), the court noted, “The impugned order has rightly held that Emami and OSAPL are not group companies… The shareholding pattern and economic interests are irrelevant once non-affiliation is established.”

The judgment emphasized the importance of evidence and pleadings to support allegations, stating, “There are no pleadings to support the contentions… these contentions are wholly bereft of any merit.”

Decided on: 12.05.2023

NTPC LTD  VS  EMAMI POWER LTD & ANR             

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/NTPCL-VS-EMAMI-POWER-12-MAY-DHC.pdf"]

Latest Legal News