Section 164 CrPC Statement Recorded Without Procedural Safeguards Or 'Cooling-Off' Period Not A Valid Confession: Jharkhand High Court Anticipatory Bail Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Investigation Is At A Nascent Stage If Custodial Interrogation Is Not Indispensable: Telangana High Court Actual Pay Drawn During Last 10 Months Must Be Basis For Pension Calculation, Regardless Of Notional Pay In Parent Bank: Punjab & Haryana High Court Limitation For Redemption Of Usufructuary Mortgage Starts Only When Mortgage Money Is Paid Or Tendered: Allahabad High Court Exclusion Of Natural Heir From Will Not A Suspicious Circumstance If Execution Is Duly Proved: Punjab & Haryana High Court Right To Travel Abroad Is A Basic Human Right; Permission Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Visit Is For 'Social Or Celebratory' Purpose: Andhra Pradesh High Court Citizen Cannot Be Externed Merely For Raising Grievances Against Government Decisions: Bombay High Court Lack Of Opportunity To Cross-Examine Partition Commissioner Does Not Vitiate Final Decree; Report Is Part Of Record: Calcutta High Court Section 27 Evidence Act Recoveries Inadmissible If Police Had Prior Knowledge Of Location Before Recording Disclosure: Delhi High Court Foreigners Act | Burden Of Proof To Establish Citizenship Solely On Proceedee, Never Shifts; Prescription For Parkinson's No Proof Of Mental Illness To Explain Testimony Contradictions: Gauhati High Court Trial Court Erred In Abating Suit While Application To Bring Legal Heirs On Record Was Pending: Gujarat High Court Places Of Worship Act 1991 Not A Shield Against Land Acquisition By State For Public Purpose: Allahabad High Court Unregistered Partition Deed Creating New Rights In Immovable Property Inadmissible In Evidence: Himachal Pradesh High Court Illiteracy No Excuse For Filing False Income Tax Returns, Court Must Presume Culpable Mental State Under Section 278E: Jharkhand High Court Trial Court Must Consider Convenience Of Family & Accused's Right To Assist Counsel While Deciding Jail Shifting Applications: J&K High Court Investigation Substantially Complete, Offence Carries Max 7 Years Jail: Karnataka High Court Grants Bail To Police Officers In Corruption Case Buyer's Knowledge Of Title Defect Doesn't Extinguish Statutory Warranty Of Title Unless Sale Deed Specifically Excludes It: Kerala High Court Madras High Court Sets Aside Appointment Of PAs To Judges, Says Relaxation Of Qualifications Via Circular Violates Article 14 BNSS | Mere Allegation Of Calling Deceased To Spot Not Sufficient To Deny Bail To Woman If Charge Sheet Filed: Orissa High Court Amendment To Rectify Property Description In Agreement To Sell Can Be Allowed At Any Stage Of Specific Performance Suit: Delhi High Court NDPS | Confession Before Police Cannot Be Sole Basis For Prosecution: Telangana High Court Grants Bail No Judicial Sanctity For Adulterous Relationships: J&K High Court Refuses To Quash Abduction FIR Involving Married Woman Habitual Offender Accused Of Brutal Murder Of SC Community Member Denied Bail: Kerala High Court Prosecution Fails To Prove Murder Charge As Recovery Witnesses Turn Hostile: Uttarakhand High Court Acquits Man Acquittal In Criminal Case Based On Benefit Of Doubt Does Not Automatically Absolve Employee From Disciplinary Liability: Madhya Pradesh High Court Punjab & Haryana HC Quashes FIR Against Woman For Dressing Pet Dog As Lord Krishna Personal Laws Cannot Be Used As Shield To Commit Gang Rape Under Garb Of Nikah Halala: Allahabad High Court

Delhi High Court Dismisses Appeals Alleging Collusion in Bidding Process

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Delhi, India – In a recent judgment, the Delhi High Court dismissed appeals filed by NTPC Ltd, a leading power company, alleging collusion in the bidding process. The court ruled that the allegations of collusion between Emami Power Ltd and Oriental Sales Agencies (India) were baseless and lacked evidence. The judgment, delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Najmi Waziri and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sudhir Kumar Jain, emphasized the need for concrete proof to establish collusion.

The court stated, "The Impugned order has rightly held, indeed it was conceded by the appellant, that Emami and OSAPL were not group companies; there was nothing on the record to establish that the two companies which are otherwise independent and separate entities, could be said to have colluded or otherwise conspired to cause any monetary loss or injury or impediment in the affairs of the appellant.”

Furthermore, the court rejected the appellant’s contention that Emami and OSAPL had caused harm to NTPC Ltd, as no loss was proven to have been suffered by the appellant. The appeals were dismissed, and the court ordered the release of the deposited monies to Emami Power Ltd and Oriental Sales Agencies (India) along with any accrued interest.

Highlighting the interpretation of the Request for Selection (RFS), the court noted, “The impugned order has rightly held that Emami and OSAPL are not group companies… The shareholding pattern and economic interests are irrelevant once non-affiliation is established.”

The judgment emphasized the importance of evidence and pleadings to support allegations, stating, “There are no pleadings to support the contentions… these contentions are wholly bereft of any merit.”

Decided on: 12.05.2023

NTPC LTD  VS  EMAMI POWER LTD & ANR             

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/NTPCL-VS-EMAMI-POWER-12-MAY-DHC.pdf"]

Latest Legal News