Even 1.5 Years in Jail Doesn’t Dilute Section 37 NDPS Rigour: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Bail in 710 Kg Poppy Husk Case Stay of Conviction Nullifies Disqualification Under Section 8(3) RP Act: Allahabad High Court Dismisses Quo Warranto Against Rahul Gandhi Custodial Interrogation Necessary to Uncover ₹2 Crore MGNREGA Scam: Kerala High Court Rejects Anticipatory Bail for Vendors in Corruption Case Order 41 Rule 23 CPC | Trial Court Cannot Decide Title Solely on a Vacated Judgment: Himachal Pradesh High Court Strikes By Bar Associations Cannot Stall Justice: Allahabad High Court Holds Office Bearers Liable for Contempt if Revenue Suits Are Delayed Due to Boycotts To Constitute a Service PE, Services Must Be Furnished Within India Through Employees Present in India: Delhi High Court Medical Negligence | State Liable for Loss of Vision in Botched Cataract Surgeries: Gauhati High Court Awards Compensation Waiver of Right Under Section 50 NDPS is Valid Even Without Panch Signatures: Bombay High Court Agricultural Land Is 'Property' Under Hindu Women’s Right to Property Act, 1937: A.P. High Court Tenant Who Pays Rent After Verifying Landlord’s Will Cannot Dispute His Title Under Section 116 Evidence Act: Himachal Pradesh High Court Dismisses Eviction Challenge by HP State Cooperative Bank Clever Drafting Cannot Override Limitation Bar: Gujarat High Court Rejects Suit for Specific Performance Once Divorce by Mutual Consent Is Final, Wife Cannot Pursue Criminal Case for Stridhan Without Reserving Right to Do So: Himachal Pradesh High Court Caste-Based Insults Must Show Intent – Mere Abuse Not Enough for Atrocities Act: Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal Failure to Inform Detenu of Right to Represent to Detaining Authority Vitiates NSA Detention: Gauhati High Court Awarding Further Interest On Penal Charges Is Contrary To Fundamental Policy Of Indian Arbitration Law: Bombay High Court

Degrees Through Distance Education From Non-Recognized Institutions Cannot Be Grounds for Promotion: Punjab & Haryana High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has dismissed a series of petitions seeking promotion based on diplomas obtained through distance education from an unrecognized university. The court underscored that diplomas acquired through distance learning from non-recognized institutions cannot be considered valid for the purpose of employment promotion.

 

The court was dealing with writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioners sought promotion to the post of Junior Engineer, contending their eligibility based on diplomas in Civil Engineering obtained from the Institute of Advanced Studies in Education Deemed University, Gandhi Vidya Mandir, Sardarshahr, Rajasthan. However, this university was not recognized by the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) for distance education.

 

The petitioners were appointed as Tube-Well Operators and later sought promotion to Junior Engineer, based on the said diplomas. The respondents rejected their promotion, citing the non-recognition of the university for distance education by AICTE. The petitioners argued that their diplomas were valid and relied on precedents, while the respondents contended the opposite based on the same.

 

Precedents and Validity of Diploma: The court referred to the Division Bench judgments in the Kartar Singh and Jasvir Singh cases, which denied the validity of degrees and diplomas through distance education from non-recognized institutions for employment promotion. The court noted that the judgment in Swaran Singh’s case, cited by the petitioners, was not applicable as it was per-incuriam and did not consider the Division Bench Judgment in Kartar Singh’s case.

Non-recognition of the Institution: The court emphasized that the diploma obtained by the petitioners was through distance education from a non-recognized institution, and no documents were provided to prove the approval of the Diploma certificate by the State of Punjab.

 

The court dismissed the petitions, finding no merit in the petitioner’s claim for promotion based on the diplomas obtained through distance education from a non-recognized university. It upheld the respondents’ decision, citing the non-recognition of the institution.

 

 Date of Decision: April 3, 2024

Lakhwinder Singh, Sukhwinder Singh, Bishan Dass vs. Managing Director, Punjab Water Source Management and Development Corporation and others

Latest Legal News