Revenue Authority Cannot Vest Land In State Under Section 79A, Suo Motu Proceedings After 11 Years Fatal: Gujarat High Court Campaigning During 48-Hour Silent Period Is Not 'Undue Influence' Under Section 123(2), Election Petition Must Plead How Result Was Materially Affected: Bombay High Court DVDs Carrying Encoded Data Infringe Patent Even If Stampers Are Outsourced: Delhi High Court in Philips’ DVD-ROM Patent Dispute Departmental Exoneration Does Not Bar Criminal Trial If Key Evidence Not Considered: Karnataka HC Refuses To Quash PSI’s Corruption Case Can't Claim Irrevocable License Under Section 60 Easements Act Without Pleading It First: Punjab & Haryana High Court Ex Parte Decree Obtained Behind Back of True Owner Confers No Title; Appellate Stage Cannot Be Used to Rescue a Fundamentally Flawed Claim: Supreme Court Order XLI Rule 27 CPC | Appeal Cannot Be Decided Without First Adjudicating Additional Evidence Application: Supreme Court Section 498A IPC | Only Allegation Quarrelling Is Not a Criminal Offence, Cannot Sustain Cognizance: Supreme Court Quash Proceedings Eye-Witness Survives 82 Pages of Cross-Examination: Allahabad High Court Upholds Murder Conviction Payment of Tax Receipts Is Not A Conclusive Proof of Possession of Property: Andhra Pradesh High Court Spa Owner Who Personally Received Marked Currency And Promised 'Nice Females With Closed Door Rooms' Cannot Escape Trafficking Charges: Bombay High Court No Person Can Transfer A Better Title Than What He Possesses In Property So Transferred: Andhra Pradesh High Court Unsubstantiated Allegations of Illicit Affair and Attempt to Kill Child in Written Statement Amount to Mental Cruelty: Calcutta High Court Grants Divorce Child Dies Inside Anganwadi Centre After Repeated Complaints About Exposed Wires Went Unaddressed: Chhattisgarh High Court Takes Suo Motu Cognisance, Directs Statewide Safety Audit 'High Speed' Without Mentioning Approximate Speed Not Sufficient To Prove Rash And Negligent Driving Under Section 279 IPC: Himachal Pradesh High Court 'Reverse Passing Off' Is Not an Actionable Tort in Indian Trade Mark Law: Delhi High Court: SARFAESI E-Auction Purchaser Cannot Be Prosecuted For Undervaluation When DRT Has Affirmed Valuation: Jharkhand High Court Republishing Defamatory Facebook Post On Website Constitutes Fresh Offence of Defamation; Prior Publication In Public Domain No Defence: Kerala High Court One Year Custody Not Prolonged In Cases Involving Attack On Police Post With Explosive Substance: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Bail Bribe Demand Can Be Proved Through Electronic Evidence Even If Complainant Turns Hostile: Rajasthan High Court Sand Theft Under BNS And Kerala Sand Act Can Be Prosecuted Simultaneously; Earlier Contrary View Per Incuriam: Kerala High Court Judge Overrules Own Judgment Sale Agreement Executed As Security For Loan Is A Sham Document Not Enforceable By Specific Performance: Supreme Court

Degrees Through Distance Education From Non-Recognized Institutions Cannot Be Grounds for Promotion: Punjab & Haryana High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has dismissed a series of petitions seeking promotion based on diplomas obtained through distance education from an unrecognized university. The court underscored that diplomas acquired through distance learning from non-recognized institutions cannot be considered valid for the purpose of employment promotion.

 

The court was dealing with writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioners sought promotion to the post of Junior Engineer, contending their eligibility based on diplomas in Civil Engineering obtained from the Institute of Advanced Studies in Education Deemed University, Gandhi Vidya Mandir, Sardarshahr, Rajasthan. However, this university was not recognized by the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) for distance education.

 

The petitioners were appointed as Tube-Well Operators and later sought promotion to Junior Engineer, based on the said diplomas. The respondents rejected their promotion, citing the non-recognition of the university for distance education by AICTE. The petitioners argued that their diplomas were valid and relied on precedents, while the respondents contended the opposite based on the same.

 

Precedents and Validity of Diploma: The court referred to the Division Bench judgments in the Kartar Singh and Jasvir Singh cases, which denied the validity of degrees and diplomas through distance education from non-recognized institutions for employment promotion. The court noted that the judgment in Swaran Singh’s case, cited by the petitioners, was not applicable as it was per-incuriam and did not consider the Division Bench Judgment in Kartar Singh’s case.

Non-recognition of the Institution: The court emphasized that the diploma obtained by the petitioners was through distance education from a non-recognized institution, and no documents were provided to prove the approval of the Diploma certificate by the State of Punjab.

 

The court dismissed the petitions, finding no merit in the petitioner’s claim for promotion based on the diplomas obtained through distance education from a non-recognized university. It upheld the respondents’ decision, citing the non-recognition of the institution.

 

 Date of Decision: April 3, 2024

Lakhwinder Singh, Sukhwinder Singh, Bishan Dass vs. Managing Director, Punjab Water Source Management and Development Corporation and others

Latest Legal News