Mere Reproduction Of Evidence Can Never Be Equated With Appreciation: Karnataka High Court Quashes Penalty Against Govt Employee Accused Cannot Repeatedly Send Cheque To FSL Till Favourable Report Is Obtained: Kerala High Court In NI Act Case Succession Certificate Cannot Be Issued For Gold Jewels Pledged With Bank, Applies Only To Debts And Securities: Madras High Court Order 11 Rule 14 CPC | Court Cannot Direct Production Of Documents Without Ascertaining They Are In Party's Possession: Calcutta High Court Undertrial Prisoners Don't Suffer 'Civil Death', Retain Fundamental Right To Alienate Property From Jail: Rajasthan High Court Direction For Reasonable Annual Enhancement Of Maintenance Under Section 125 CrPC Merely Preserves Its Real Value Against Inflation: Delhi High Court Testimony Of Sole Interested Witness Must Be Of 'Sterling Quality' To Base Conviction: Patna High Court Acquits Murder Convict Failure To Communicate Written Grounds Of Arrest Renders Arrest Constitutionally Infirm, Accused Entitled To Bail: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 482 CrPC Petition Not Maintainable Against Order Framing Charge Under SC/ST Act, Appeal Lies Under Section 14A: Tripura High Court Disputed Questions Of Fact Regarding Title And Forged Documents Cannot Be Decided Under Article 226: Telangana High Court Matter To Be Enquired By Bar Council: Madhya Pradesh High Court Dismisses Lawyer's PILs With Costs For Suppressing Attorney-Client Relationship BDA Cannot Arbitrarily Reverse Resolutions Passed To Comply With Judicial Directives: Karnataka High Court Section 52A NDPS Act: Mere Non-Compliance Does Not Automatically Vitiate Trial Unless Evidence Is Doubtful: Punjab & Haryana High Court Seniority Must Be Determined From Date Of Substantive Appointment, Not Ad-Hoc Service: Allahabad High Court Uncorroborated Testimony Of Drug Inspector Cannot Form Sole Basis For Conviction Under Drugs Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court Suppression Of Adverse Facts Strikes At Root Of Equitable Jurisdiction: Bombay High Court Denies Injunction In HUF Property Dispute

Degrees Through Distance Education From Non-Recognized Institutions Cannot Be Grounds for Promotion: Punjab & Haryana High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has dismissed a series of petitions seeking promotion based on diplomas obtained through distance education from an unrecognized university. The court underscored that diplomas acquired through distance learning from non-recognized institutions cannot be considered valid for the purpose of employment promotion.

 

The court was dealing with writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioners sought promotion to the post of Junior Engineer, contending their eligibility based on diplomas in Civil Engineering obtained from the Institute of Advanced Studies in Education Deemed University, Gandhi Vidya Mandir, Sardarshahr, Rajasthan. However, this university was not recognized by the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) for distance education.

 

The petitioners were appointed as Tube-Well Operators and later sought promotion to Junior Engineer, based on the said diplomas. The respondents rejected their promotion, citing the non-recognition of the university for distance education by AICTE. The petitioners argued that their diplomas were valid and relied on precedents, while the respondents contended the opposite based on the same.

 

Precedents and Validity of Diploma: The court referred to the Division Bench judgments in the Kartar Singh and Jasvir Singh cases, which denied the validity of degrees and diplomas through distance education from non-recognized institutions for employment promotion. The court noted that the judgment in Swaran Singh’s case, cited by the petitioners, was not applicable as it was per-incuriam and did not consider the Division Bench Judgment in Kartar Singh’s case.

Non-recognition of the Institution: The court emphasized that the diploma obtained by the petitioners was through distance education from a non-recognized institution, and no documents were provided to prove the approval of the Diploma certificate by the State of Punjab.

 

The court dismissed the petitions, finding no merit in the petitioner’s claim for promotion based on the diplomas obtained through distance education from a non-recognized university. It upheld the respondents’ decision, citing the non-recognition of the institution.

 

 Date of Decision: April 3, 2024

Lakhwinder Singh, Sukhwinder Singh, Bishan Dass vs. Managing Director, Punjab Water Source Management and Development Corporation and others

Latest Legal News