Limitation Act | Litigant Cannot Be Punished For Court's Own Docket Load: J&K High Court Illicit Affair Alone Cannot Make a Man Guilty of Abetting Suicide: Supreme Court Quashes Charge Under Section 306 IPC Landlord Cannot Be Punished for Slowness of Courts: Supreme Court on Bonafide Need in Eviction Suits Expect States To Enact Laws Regulating Unlicensed Money Lenders Charging Exorbitant Interest Contrary To 'Damdupat': Supreme Court Accused Who Skips Lok Adalat After Seeking It, Then Cries 'Prejudice', Cannot Claim Apprehension of Denial of Justice: Madras High Court Refuse To Transfer Case IO Cannot Act Without Prior Sanction: Gujarat High Court Grants Bail, Flags Procedural Lapse in Religious Conversion Case Electricity Board Strictly Liable For Unprotected Transformer, 7-Year-Old Cannot Be Guilty Of Contributory Negligence: Allahabad High Court POCSO Conviction Can't Stand For Offence Not Charged: Delhi High Court Member of Unlawful Assembly Cannot Escape Conviction By Claiming He Only Carried a Lathi and Struck No One: Allahabad High Court Jurisdiction Cannot Be Founded On Casual Or Incidental Facts If Not Have A Direct Nexus With The Lis: : Delhi High Court Clause Stating Disputes "Can" Be Settled By Arbitration Is Not A Binding Arbitration Agreement: Supreme Court State Cannot Plead Helplessness Against Sand Mafia; Supreme Court Warns Of Paramilitary Deployment, Complete Mining Ban In MP & Rajasthan Authority Cannot Withdraw Subsidy Citing Non-Compliance When It Ignored Repeated Requests For Inspection: Supreme Court Out-of-State SC/ST/OBC Candidates Cannot Claim Rajasthan's Reservation Benefits in NEET PG Counselling: Rajasthan High Court Supreme Court Upholds Haryana's Regularisation Of Qualified Ad Hoc Staff As 'One-Time Measure', Strikes Down Futuristic Cut-Offs

Degrees Through Distance Education From Non-Recognized Institutions Cannot Be Grounds for Promotion: Punjab & Haryana High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has dismissed a series of petitions seeking promotion based on diplomas obtained through distance education from an unrecognized university. The court underscored that diplomas acquired through distance learning from non-recognized institutions cannot be considered valid for the purpose of employment promotion.

 

The court was dealing with writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioners sought promotion to the post of Junior Engineer, contending their eligibility based on diplomas in Civil Engineering obtained from the Institute of Advanced Studies in Education Deemed University, Gandhi Vidya Mandir, Sardarshahr, Rajasthan. However, this university was not recognized by the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) for distance education.

 

The petitioners were appointed as Tube-Well Operators and later sought promotion to Junior Engineer, based on the said diplomas. The respondents rejected their promotion, citing the non-recognition of the university for distance education by AICTE. The petitioners argued that their diplomas were valid and relied on precedents, while the respondents contended the opposite based on the same.

 

Precedents and Validity of Diploma: The court referred to the Division Bench judgments in the Kartar Singh and Jasvir Singh cases, which denied the validity of degrees and diplomas through distance education from non-recognized institutions for employment promotion. The court noted that the judgment in Swaran Singh’s case, cited by the petitioners, was not applicable as it was per-incuriam and did not consider the Division Bench Judgment in Kartar Singh’s case.

Non-recognition of the Institution: The court emphasized that the diploma obtained by the petitioners was through distance education from a non-recognized institution, and no documents were provided to prove the approval of the Diploma certificate by the State of Punjab.

 

The court dismissed the petitions, finding no merit in the petitioner’s claim for promotion based on the diplomas obtained through distance education from a non-recognized university. It upheld the respondents’ decision, citing the non-recognition of the institution.

 

 Date of Decision: April 3, 2024

Lakhwinder Singh, Sukhwinder Singh, Bishan Dass vs. Managing Director, Punjab Water Source Management and Development Corporation and others

Latest Legal News