MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Constitutional Bar on Interference in Electoral Matters: Telangana High Court Dismisses Writ Challenging Election Nomination Rejection

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Telangana High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by Kambalapally Ravindra Prasad, challenging the rejection of his nomination form for the Ibrahimpatnam Assembly Constituency. The bench, comprising Chief Justice Alok Aradhe and Justice N.V. Shravan Kumar, upheld the constitutional provision that bars courts from interfering in electoral processes.

The petitioner's nomination was rejected by the Returning Officer on November 15, 2023, due to discrepancies between the names of the proposers on the nomination form and the electoral rolls. Arguing against this decision, the petitioner cited it as "arbitrary, mechanical and suffers from the vice of non-application of mind," referencing the Supreme Court decision in Mohinder Singh Gill v. Chief Election Commissioner.

In its judgment, the High Court referred to Article 329(b) of the Constitution of India, which explicitly prohibits court intervention in electoral matters. The bench stated, "No election to either House of Parliament or to the House or either House of the Legislature of a State shall be called in question except by an election petition presented to such authority and in such manner as may be provided for by or under any law made by the appropriate Legislature.” This reference underlines the court's position on maintaining the sanctity of the electoral process and the constitutional provisions governing it.

The court further elaborated on its decision by referencing the landmark case of N.P. Ponnuswami v. Returning Officer, Namakkal Constituency, highlighting the principle that any grievance regarding election proceedings should be addressed through an election petition after the election is over, rather than through intermediate judicial remedies.

While dismissing the petition, the court granted the petitioner the liberty to take recourse to an election petition if so advised. This ruling reinforces the judiciary's stance on non-interference in the electoral process, in line with constitutional mandates and established legal precedents.

Date of Decision: 20th November 2023

KAMBALAPALLY RAVINDRA PRASAD  VS THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA

Latest Legal News