Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

Constitutional Bar on Interference in Electoral Matters: Telangana High Court Dismisses Writ Challenging Election Nomination Rejection

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Telangana High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by Kambalapally Ravindra Prasad, challenging the rejection of his nomination form for the Ibrahimpatnam Assembly Constituency. The bench, comprising Chief Justice Alok Aradhe and Justice N.V. Shravan Kumar, upheld the constitutional provision that bars courts from interfering in electoral processes.

The petitioner's nomination was rejected by the Returning Officer on November 15, 2023, due to discrepancies between the names of the proposers on the nomination form and the electoral rolls. Arguing against this decision, the petitioner cited it as "arbitrary, mechanical and suffers from the vice of non-application of mind," referencing the Supreme Court decision in Mohinder Singh Gill v. Chief Election Commissioner.

In its judgment, the High Court referred to Article 329(b) of the Constitution of India, which explicitly prohibits court intervention in electoral matters. The bench stated, "No election to either House of Parliament or to the House or either House of the Legislature of a State shall be called in question except by an election petition presented to such authority and in such manner as may be provided for by or under any law made by the appropriate Legislature.” This reference underlines the court's position on maintaining the sanctity of the electoral process and the constitutional provisions governing it.

The court further elaborated on its decision by referencing the landmark case of N.P. Ponnuswami v. Returning Officer, Namakkal Constituency, highlighting the principle that any grievance regarding election proceedings should be addressed through an election petition after the election is over, rather than through intermediate judicial remedies.

While dismissing the petition, the court granted the petitioner the liberty to take recourse to an election petition if so advised. This ruling reinforces the judiciary's stance on non-interference in the electoral process, in line with constitutional mandates and established legal precedents.

Date of Decision: 20th November 2023

KAMBALAPALLY RAVINDRA PRASAD  VS THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA

Latest Legal News