Section 32 Arbitration Act | Termination for Non-Payment of Fees Ends Arbitrator’s Mandate; Remedy Lies in Section 14(2): Supreme Court False Allegations of Dowry and Bigamy Amount to Mental Cruelty: Madras High Court Upholds Divorce Plaintiff Must Prove Her Own Title Before Seeking Demolition Of Defendant’s Pre-existing House: Andhra Pradesh High Court Mismatch Between Bullet and Recovered Gun Fatal to Prosecution: Calcutta High Court Acquits Man Convicted for Murder Where the Conduct of the Sole Eye-Witness Appears Unnatural and No Independent Witness Is Examined, Conviction Cannot Stand: Allahabad High Court Fraudulent Sale of Vehicle During Hire Purchase Renders Agreement Void: Gauhati High Court Upholds Decree for Refund of ₹4.90 Lakhs Unsigned Written Statement Can’t Silence a Defendant: Hyper-Technical Objections Must Yield to Substantive Justice: Delhi High Court Default Bail | No Accused, No Extension: Delhi High Court Rules Custody Extension Without Notice as Gross Illegality Under Article 21 Gratuity Can Be Withheld Post-Retirement for Proven Negligence Under Service Rules – Payment of Gratuity Act Does Not Override CDA Rules: Calcutta High Court Cognizance Is of the Offence, Not the Offender: Madras High Court Rejects Challenge to ED’s Supplementary Complaint in PMLA Case Acquittal in Rajasthan No Bar to Trial in Madhya Pradesh: MP High Court Rejects Double Jeopardy Plea in Antiquities Theft Case 20% Deposit Isn’t Automatic in Cheque Bounce Appeals: Right to Appeal Can’t Be Priced Out: Punjab & Haryana High Court Checks Mechanical Use of Section 148 NI Act A Child Is Not a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets New Benchmark in Compensation for Minors’ Deaths 90 Days Is Not Sacrosanct – Courts Can Permit Reply to Counter-Claim Even Beyond Prescribed Time in Interest of Justice: Punjab & Haryana High Court Magistrate Can Proceed Only for Offences Committed in India Until Sanction Is Obtained for Acts Outside India: Orissa High Court on International Financial Fraud Award Is Vitiated by Non-Consideration of Material Evidence: Orissa High Court Sets Aside Industrial Tribunal’s Wage Award in IMFA Case POCSO | Absence of Child's Name in Birth Certificate Not Fatal: Kerala High Court No One Has the Right to Impute Illicit Motives to Judges in the Name of Free Speech: Karnataka High Court Jails Man for Criminal Contempt DV Complaint Cannot Be Quashed at Threshold Under Article 227: Madras High Court Refuses to Interfere, Directs Accused to Seek Remedy Before Magistrate Recovery Wasn't From Accused's Exclusive Knowledge — Cylinder Already Marked in Site Plan Before Arrest: Allahabad High Court Acquits Man in Murder Case State Can’t Block SARFAESI Sale by Late Revenue Entries: Secured Creditor’s Charge Prevails Over Tax Dues: Punjab & Haryana High Court Slams Sub-Registrar’s Refusal Providing SIM Card Without Knowledge of Its Criminal Use Does Not Imply Criminal Conspiracy: P&H High Court Grants Bail in UAPA & Murder Case Importer Who Accepts Enhanced Valuation Cannot Later Contest Confiscation and Penalty for Undervaluation: Madras High Court Upholds Strict Liability under Customs Act "Allegations Are Not Proof: Madras High Court Refuses Divorce Without Substantiated Cruelty or Desertion" When FIR Is Filed After Consulting Political Leaders, the Possibility of Coloured Version Cannot Be Ruled Out: Kerala High Court Mere Allegations of Antecedents Without Conviction Can't Defeat Right to Anticipatory Bail: Kerala High Court Section 106 Of Evidence Act Cannot Be Invoked In Vacuum – Prosecution Must First Lay Foundational Facts: Karnataka High Court Acquits Wife And Co-Accused In Husband’s Murder Case Parity Cannot Be Claimed When Roles Are Different: Karnataka High Court Refuses Bail to Youth Accused of Brutal Killing Injured Wife Would Not Falsely Implicate Her Husband: Gauhati High Court Upholds Conviction in Domestic Stabbing Case Disputed Bids, Missing Evidence and No Prejudice: Delhi High Court Refuses to Intervene in Tender Challenge under Article 226 Setting Fire to House Where Only Minors Were Present is a Heinous Offence – No Quashing Merely Because Parties Settled: Calcutta High Court No Exclusive Possession Means Licence, Not Lease: Calcutta High Court Rules City Civil Court Has Jurisdiction to Evict Licensees Defendant's Own Family Attested the Sale Agreement – Yet She Called It Nominal: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Specific Performance Renewal Not Automatic, No Evidence Of Notice Or Mutual Agreement: AP High Court Dismisses Indian Oil’s Appeal Against Eviction

Citizens Are Not Cattle, You Cannot Let Them Die in Silence: Rajasthan High Court Blasts Government Inaction Amid 50°C Heatwave

18 April 2025 10:28 AM

By: Deepak Kumar


“Funds for Publicity But None for Saving Lives? This Is Apathy at Its Peak” — High Court Warns Rajasthan Authorities of Contempt in Heatwave Crisis. In a searing judgment delivered on April 17, 2025, the Rajasthan High Court at Jaipur, through Justice Anoop Kumar Dhand, condemned the State Government for its “shocking” failure to implement even the most basic preventive measures to protect the public from an ongoing deadly heatwave. Calling the inaction “prima facie contemptuous,” the Court declared that “citizens cannot be treated as cattle,” and warned that the judiciary will not remain mute spectators while people die from extreme temperatures crossing 50°C in several districts.
The Court revived its earlier suo moto proceedings under the title “Save the Planet Earth and the Future Generations of this Universe”, stating with urgency, “This Court feels pain and expresses its concern for the people suffering from extreme heatwaves and heat strokes… There is no mechanism implemented so far.”
“The Orders Have Been Kept in Cold Storage While the State Burns — This Is Bureaucratic Indifference, Not Incompetence”
Justice Dhand found that the orders passed almost a year ago, in May 2024, had been disregarded by all government departments. “No effective action plan has been framed,” the Court noted, “and no precautionary steps have been taken for the safety of the general public, especially daily wage earners, rickshaw pullers, labourers, women, and children.”
“What is the value of judicial orders if they are treated like trash by the administration?” the Court asked pointedly, noting that this kind of obstinacy “erodes the credibility of the rule of law.” He observed that the absence of a heatwave preparedness plan in a desert state like Rajasthan is not only “disturbing but shameful.”
“You Have Crores for Publicity and Award Ceremonies But No Money for ORS and Shade — What Does That Say About Your Priorities?”
Rejecting any anticipated excuse about lack of budgetary provisions, the Court said, “You cannot spend millions on award ceremonies, rallies and publicity and then claim you have no funds to save human lives.” Justice Dhand emphasized that “taxpayers’ money must be used in public interest, not vanity projects.”
The Court observed that even simple, low-cost measures like mango panna, ORS packets, water kiosks, tree plantation, and shaded waiting areas had not been arranged, despite being part of prior orders.
“Your Heat Action Plans Exist Only on Paper — You Ignored Your Own Climate Strategies”
Justice Dhand castigated both the Central and State Governments for failing to act on their own policies. Rajasthan’s Heat Action Plan, and the Centre’s National Program on Climate Change and Health, had been in place since 2013, but none had been operationalized.
“You had the plan. You had the power. You did nothing,” the Court stated, finding that the “lack of execution is not mere laziness, it is a constitutional breach of duty.”
Referring to the 2015 draft Bill on Prevention of Deaths Due to Heat and Cold Waves, which remains pending before Parliament, the judge remarked, “Even legislation that could have saved lives lies forgotten. For reasons best known to the Central Government, the Bill has not seen the light of day.”
“Shade Is Not a Luxury, It’s a Lifesaving Necessity — And Even That You Failed to Provide”
The Court ordered the State to immediately implement cooling shelters, distribute fluids and ORS, and broadcast heatwave alerts across print, electronic, and digital media. “The shade offered by a cloth, cap, turban or umbrella can even save lives,” the Court remarked, directing that such messaging be sent through FM radio, Doordarshan, text alerts, and all communication platforms.
It also directed that all public offices, contractors, and employers provide rest hours to outdoor workers during peak heat hours between noon and 3 PM.
“This Court Will Not Hesitate to Use Coercive Powers — If You Fail Again, Be Ready for Legal Consequences”
Issuing notices to concerned authorities, the High Court warned that continued disregard for its orders would lead to contempt proceedings. “Contempt is not just disobedience — it is an affront to the institution of justice,” the Court said, directing the State to file an affidavit listing all steps taken, and why officials should not be held accountable.
The judgment concluded with a stark reminder: “Preparedness today determines survival tomorrow. This Court expects immediate and sincere compliance — not bureaucratic eyewash.”
Date of Decision: April 17, 2025

 

Latest Legal News