PSU MD Ineligible To Unilaterally Appoint Sole Arbitrator; General Consent Not 'Express Waiver' Under Section 12(5): Allahabad High Court Testimony Of Chance Witnesses Requires Cautious Scrutiny; Presence Must Be Adequately Explained To Sustain Conviction: Allahabad High Court Decree Holder Can Execute Award Against Guarantor Even If Execution Against Principal Borrower Is Pending: Andhra Pradesh High Court NDPS Accused Entitled To Bail If Charge-Sheet Filed Without FSL Report & Tended Later Via Simple Letter: Bombay High Court Cyber Fraud Accused Who Is 'Prime Perpetrator' Cannot Claim Parity With Beneficiaries Who Received Bail: Calcutta High Court Non-Disclosure Of Cash Loan In Income Tax Returns Not A Valid Defence Under Section 138 NI Act: Delhi High Court Non-Examination Of Informant Not Fatal In Corruption Cases If Demand & Acceptance Proved Through Other Evidence: Delhi High Court Trial Judges Must Not Be Mute Spectators; Prosecution Duty To Place Exculpatory Evidence Before Court: Gujarat High Court Failure To Open Sealed Contraband Samples During Trial Vitiates Conviction; Prosecution Must Establish Physical Link In Court: Himachal Pradesh High Court Individual Liberty Must Yield To Collective Interest In Gang Rape Cases: Jammu & Kashmir & Ladakh High Court Denies Bail Able-Bodied Husband Can't Avoid Maintenance By Citing Unemployment; Wife's Employment No Bar To Bridge 'Status Gap': Karnataka High Court Kerala High Court Grants Bail To Accused Who Absconded For 14 Years; Says Continued Incarceration Unnecessary Since Investigation Is Over POCSO Trial Court Cannot Suo Motu Order Assistance Of Special Educator Without First Assessing Competency Of Victim: Madras High Court Compassionate Appointment Claim Cannot Be Rejected On Ground Of Deceased Employee's Service Record If Not In Policy: Madhya Pradesh HC Limitation For Filing Written Statement In Commercial Suits Triggers From Service Of Summons With Plaint: Telangana High Court 'Last Seen' Theory Alone Insufficient To Convict For Murder Without Corroborative Evidence: Supreme Court Acquits Two In Charred Body Case Bail Cannot Be Cancelled Under Section 480(3) BNSS If Subsequent Offence Carries Punishment Less Than 7 Years: Supreme Court Joint Discovery Statements By Multiple Accused A 'Myth', Section 27 Evidence Act Requires Specific Authorship: Supreme Court Acquits Murder Convicts "Further Inquiry" Under Service Rules Does Not Permit De Novo Probe: Supreme Court Reinstates Judicial Officer

Citizens Are Not Cattle, You Cannot Let Them Die in Silence: Rajasthan High Court Blasts Government Inaction Amid 50°C Heatwave

18 April 2025 10:28 AM

By: Deepak Kumar


“Funds for Publicity But None for Saving Lives? This Is Apathy at Its Peak” — High Court Warns Rajasthan Authorities of Contempt in Heatwave Crisis. In a searing judgment delivered on April 17, 2025, the Rajasthan High Court at Jaipur, through Justice Anoop Kumar Dhand, condemned the State Government for its “shocking” failure to implement even the most basic preventive measures to protect the public from an ongoing deadly heatwave. Calling the inaction “prima facie contemptuous,” the Court declared that “citizens cannot be treated as cattle,” and warned that the judiciary will not remain mute spectators while people die from extreme temperatures crossing 50°C in several districts.
The Court revived its earlier suo moto proceedings under the title “Save the Planet Earth and the Future Generations of this Universe”, stating with urgency, “This Court feels pain and expresses its concern for the people suffering from extreme heatwaves and heat strokes… There is no mechanism implemented so far.”
“The Orders Have Been Kept in Cold Storage While the State Burns — This Is Bureaucratic Indifference, Not Incompetence”
Justice Dhand found that the orders passed almost a year ago, in May 2024, had been disregarded by all government departments. “No effective action plan has been framed,” the Court noted, “and no precautionary steps have been taken for the safety of the general public, especially daily wage earners, rickshaw pullers, labourers, women, and children.”
“What is the value of judicial orders if they are treated like trash by the administration?” the Court asked pointedly, noting that this kind of obstinacy “erodes the credibility of the rule of law.” He observed that the absence of a heatwave preparedness plan in a desert state like Rajasthan is not only “disturbing but shameful.”
“You Have Crores for Publicity and Award Ceremonies But No Money for ORS and Shade — What Does That Say About Your Priorities?”
Rejecting any anticipated excuse about lack of budgetary provisions, the Court said, “You cannot spend millions on award ceremonies, rallies and publicity and then claim you have no funds to save human lives.” Justice Dhand emphasized that “taxpayers’ money must be used in public interest, not vanity projects.”
The Court observed that even simple, low-cost measures like mango panna, ORS packets, water kiosks, tree plantation, and shaded waiting areas had not been arranged, despite being part of prior orders.
“Your Heat Action Plans Exist Only on Paper — You Ignored Your Own Climate Strategies”
Justice Dhand castigated both the Central and State Governments for failing to act on their own policies. Rajasthan’s Heat Action Plan, and the Centre’s National Program on Climate Change and Health, had been in place since 2013, but none had been operationalized.
“You had the plan. You had the power. You did nothing,” the Court stated, finding that the “lack of execution is not mere laziness, it is a constitutional breach of duty.”
Referring to the 2015 draft Bill on Prevention of Deaths Due to Heat and Cold Waves, which remains pending before Parliament, the judge remarked, “Even legislation that could have saved lives lies forgotten. For reasons best known to the Central Government, the Bill has not seen the light of day.”
“Shade Is Not a Luxury, It’s a Lifesaving Necessity — And Even That You Failed to Provide”
The Court ordered the State to immediately implement cooling shelters, distribute fluids and ORS, and broadcast heatwave alerts across print, electronic, and digital media. “The shade offered by a cloth, cap, turban or umbrella can even save lives,” the Court remarked, directing that such messaging be sent through FM radio, Doordarshan, text alerts, and all communication platforms.
It also directed that all public offices, contractors, and employers provide rest hours to outdoor workers during peak heat hours between noon and 3 PM.
“This Court Will Not Hesitate to Use Coercive Powers — If You Fail Again, Be Ready for Legal Consequences”
Issuing notices to concerned authorities, the High Court warned that continued disregard for its orders would lead to contempt proceedings. “Contempt is not just disobedience — it is an affront to the institution of justice,” the Court said, directing the State to file an affidavit listing all steps taken, and why officials should not be held accountable.
The judgment concluded with a stark reminder: “Preparedness today determines survival tomorrow. This Court expects immediate and sincere compliance — not bureaucratic eyewash.”
Date of Decision: April 17, 2025

 

Latest Legal News