Landowners Accepting Compensation For Partial Acquisition Cannot Later Seek Entire Property’s Acquisition Under Section 94 RFCTLARR Act: Patna High Court Retrospective Maintenance Under Section 125 CrPC Must Be Commensurate With Husband's Salary In Respective Years: Madhya Pradesh High Court Injunction Order Paying 'Lip-Service' To Cardinal Tests Without Addressing Allegations Of Fraud Is Unsustainable: Calcutta High Court Land Loser Appointments: Railways Not In Contempt For Requiring Physical Tests & Matriculation Qualifications, Rules Calcutta High Court Mere Presence Or Post-Incident Help Not Sufficient To Prove Common Intention Under Section 34 IPC: Allahabad High Court Election Petition Against Municipal President Maintainable Within 30 Days Of Election Meeting Despite Absence Of Gazette Notification: Madhya Pradesh High Court Husband Cannot Be Convicted For Wife’s Death Merely Because They Lived Under Same Roof Without Proof Of His Presence: Allahabad High Court Prosecution Case Demolished If Physical Layout In IO’s Sketch Map Contradicts Witness Testimony: Calcutta High Court Suppression Of Facts Not Fatal If Not Material To Merits; State Cannot Benefit From Its Own Failure To Implement Orders: Supreme Court Nature Of Property And Limitation In Partition Suits Are Mixed Questions Of Law & Fact, Cannot Be Decided Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC: Telangana High Court Landlord Residing In Same Building Entitled To Eviction For Nuisance By Tenant's Patrons; No Need To Examine Independent Witnesses: Bombay High Court "Shocking Administrative Apathy": Supreme Court Summons Rajasthan Top Brass Over Failure To Curb Illegal Sand Mining In Chambal Sanctuary CISF Personnel Making Unsubstantiated Sexual Harassment Allegations Against Colleagues Can Be Removed From Service: Delhi High Court Decree On Admission Under Order XII Rule 6 CPC Can Be Based On Statements Made In Criminal Proceedings: Supreme Court Writ Petition Challenging Labour Tribunal Award Maintainable Even Against Privatized Air India: Delhi High Court Bar Council Of India Seeks Mamata Banerjee's Enrolment Details After Former WB CM Appears In Calcutta HC In Advocate's Robes

Citizens Are Not Cattle, You Cannot Let Them Die in Silence: Rajasthan High Court Blasts Government Inaction Amid 50°C Heatwave

18 April 2025 10:28 AM

By: Deepak Kumar


“Funds for Publicity But None for Saving Lives? This Is Apathy at Its Peak” — High Court Warns Rajasthan Authorities of Contempt in Heatwave Crisis. In a searing judgment delivered on April 17, 2025, the Rajasthan High Court at Jaipur, through Justice Anoop Kumar Dhand, condemned the State Government for its “shocking” failure to implement even the most basic preventive measures to protect the public from an ongoing deadly heatwave. Calling the inaction “prima facie contemptuous,” the Court declared that “citizens cannot be treated as cattle,” and warned that the judiciary will not remain mute spectators while people die from extreme temperatures crossing 50°C in several districts.
The Court revived its earlier suo moto proceedings under the title “Save the Planet Earth and the Future Generations of this Universe”, stating with urgency, “This Court feels pain and expresses its concern for the people suffering from extreme heatwaves and heat strokes… There is no mechanism implemented so far.”
“The Orders Have Been Kept in Cold Storage While the State Burns — This Is Bureaucratic Indifference, Not Incompetence”
Justice Dhand found that the orders passed almost a year ago, in May 2024, had been disregarded by all government departments. “No effective action plan has been framed,” the Court noted, “and no precautionary steps have been taken for the safety of the general public, especially daily wage earners, rickshaw pullers, labourers, women, and children.”
“What is the value of judicial orders if they are treated like trash by the administration?” the Court asked pointedly, noting that this kind of obstinacy “erodes the credibility of the rule of law.” He observed that the absence of a heatwave preparedness plan in a desert state like Rajasthan is not only “disturbing but shameful.”
“You Have Crores for Publicity and Award Ceremonies But No Money for ORS and Shade — What Does That Say About Your Priorities?”
Rejecting any anticipated excuse about lack of budgetary provisions, the Court said, “You cannot spend millions on award ceremonies, rallies and publicity and then claim you have no funds to save human lives.” Justice Dhand emphasized that “taxpayers’ money must be used in public interest, not vanity projects.”
The Court observed that even simple, low-cost measures like mango panna, ORS packets, water kiosks, tree plantation, and shaded waiting areas had not been arranged, despite being part of prior orders.
“Your Heat Action Plans Exist Only on Paper — You Ignored Your Own Climate Strategies”
Justice Dhand castigated both the Central and State Governments for failing to act on their own policies. Rajasthan’s Heat Action Plan, and the Centre’s National Program on Climate Change and Health, had been in place since 2013, but none had been operationalized.
“You had the plan. You had the power. You did nothing,” the Court stated, finding that the “lack of execution is not mere laziness, it is a constitutional breach of duty.”
Referring to the 2015 draft Bill on Prevention of Deaths Due to Heat and Cold Waves, which remains pending before Parliament, the judge remarked, “Even legislation that could have saved lives lies forgotten. For reasons best known to the Central Government, the Bill has not seen the light of day.”
“Shade Is Not a Luxury, It’s a Lifesaving Necessity — And Even That You Failed to Provide”
The Court ordered the State to immediately implement cooling shelters, distribute fluids and ORS, and broadcast heatwave alerts across print, electronic, and digital media. “The shade offered by a cloth, cap, turban or umbrella can even save lives,” the Court remarked, directing that such messaging be sent through FM radio, Doordarshan, text alerts, and all communication platforms.
It also directed that all public offices, contractors, and employers provide rest hours to outdoor workers during peak heat hours between noon and 3 PM.
“This Court Will Not Hesitate to Use Coercive Powers — If You Fail Again, Be Ready for Legal Consequences”
Issuing notices to concerned authorities, the High Court warned that continued disregard for its orders would lead to contempt proceedings. “Contempt is not just disobedience — it is an affront to the institution of justice,” the Court said, directing the State to file an affidavit listing all steps taken, and why officials should not be held accountable.
The judgment concluded with a stark reminder: “Preparedness today determines survival tomorrow. This Court expects immediate and sincere compliance — not bureaucratic eyewash.”
Date of Decision: April 17, 2025

 

Latest Legal News