Court Must Conduct Inquiry on Mental Competency Before Appointing Legal Guardian - Punjab and Haryana High Court Right to Bail Cannot Be Denied Merely Due to the Sentiments of Society: Kerala High Court Grants Bail in Eve Teasing Case Supreme Court Extends Probation to 70-Year-Old in Decades-Old Family Feud Case Authorized Railway Agents Cannot Be Criminally Prosecuted for Unauthorized Procurement And Supply Of Railway Tickets: Supreme Court Anticipatory Bail Cannot Be Denied Arbitrarily: Supreme Court Upholds Rights of Accused For Valid Arbitration Agreement and Party Consent Necessary: Supreme Court Declares Ex-Parte Arbitration Awards Null and Void NDPS | Lack of Homogeneous Mixing, Inventory Preparation, and Magistrate Certification Fatal to Prosecution's Case: Punjab & Haryana High Court "May Means May, and Shall Means Shall": Supreme Court Clarifies Appellate Court's Discretion Under Section 148 of NI Act Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders Re-Evaluation of Coal Block Tender, Cites Concerns Over Arbitrary Disqualification Dying Declarations Must Be Beyond Doubt to Sustain Convictions: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Accused in Burn Injury Murder Case No Legally Enforceable Debt Proven: Madras High Court Dismisses Petition for Special Leave to Appeal in Cheque Bounce Case Decisional Autonomy is a Core Part of the Right to Privacy : Kerala High Court Upholds LGBTQ+ Rights in Landmark Habeas Corpus Case Consent of a Minor Is No Defense Under the POCSO Act: Himachal Pradesh High Court Well-Known Marks Demand Special Protection: Delhi HC Cancels Conflicting Trademark for RPG Industrial Products High Court Acquits Accused Due to ‘Golden Thread’ Principle: Gaps in Medical Evidence and Unexplained Time Frame Prove Decisive Supreme Court Dissolves Marriage Citing Irretrievable Breakdown; Awards ₹12 Crore Permanent Alimony Cruelty Need Not Be Physical: Mental Agony and Emotional Distress Are Sufficient Grounds for Divorce: Supreme Court Section 195 Cr.P.C. | Tribunals Are Not Courts: Private Complaints for Offences Like False Evidence Valid: Supreme Court Limitation | Right to Appeal Is Fundamental, Especially When Liberty Is at Stake: Supreme Court Condones 1637-Day Delay FIR Quashed | No Mens Rea, No Crime: Supreme Court Emphasizes Protection of Public Servants Acting in Good Faith Trademark | Passing Off Rights Trump Registration Rights: Delhi High Court A Minor Procedural Delay Should Not Disqualify Advances as Export Credit When Exports Are Fulfilled on Time: Bombay HC Preventive Detention Must Be Based on Relevant and Proximate Material: J&K High Court Terrorism Stems From Hateful Thoughts, Not Physical Abilities: Madhya Pradesh High Court Denies Bail of Alleged ISIS Conspiracy Forwarding Offensive Content Equals Liability: Madras High Court Upholds Conviction for Derogatory Social Media Post Against Women Journalists Investigation by Trap Leader Prejudiced the Case: Rajasthan High Court Quashes Conviction in PC Case VAT | Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period Cannot Reopen Assessment: Kerala High Court Fishing Inquiry Not Permissible Under Section 91, Cr.P.C.: High Court Quashes Trial Court’s Order Directing CBI to Produce Unrelied Statements and Case Diary

Bullets of Unjustified Accusations Lead to Fatal Wounds in Matrimony: Delhi High Court Grants Divorce on Grounds of Cruelty

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Delhi High Court, led by Justices Suresh Kumar Kait and Neena Bansal Krishna, has granted divorce to Major Shashi Chauhan on the grounds of cruelty, under Section 13(1)(i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. This decision, pronounced on March 6, 2024, sets aside the previous judgment of the Family Court, which had dismissed Major Chauhan's divorce petition.

The Court assessed the case under the purview of mental cruelty as a valid ground for divorce. The bench emphasized, "Vindictiveness, vexation, and intolerance are the foes of coherent comprehension," underscoring the role of unjustified accusations in inflicting mental cruelty.

Major Shashi Chauhan and Major Ritu Bhasin, both serving in the Indian Army, had a prolonged courtship before marrying in February 2010. Soon, differences surfaced, primarily concerning dowry expectations and behavioral issues. The marriage saw a brief period of cohabitation, followed by prolonged separation and a slew of legal battles. Major Chauhan filed for divorce on grounds of cruelty, which was initially dismissed by the Family Court.

The High Court meticulously analyzed the couple's matrimonial life, allegations of cruelty, and subsequent legal proceedings. It noted that Major Bhasin failed to substantiate her allegations of cruelty and dowry harassment, instead resorting to filing multiple complaints against Major Chauhan, which either got dismissed or led to acquittal. These actions were seen as indicative of vindictiveness and mental cruelty. The Court also highlighted the long separation and lack of efforts for reconciliation, exacerbating the matrimonial discord.

Justice Neena Bansal Krishna observed, “The aggrieved person is entitled to avail the remedy under laws, but crossing the point of ‘no return’ becomes inevitable once engulfed in the rabbit hole of criminal litigations.”

Decision: Concluding that the marriage was beyond salvage, marred by irreconcilable differences, and continued legal disputes, the Court granted a decree of divorce to Major Chauhan, thereby dissolving the marriage.

Date of Decision: 06th March, 2024

Xxx vs xxx

Similar News