Bail Applicant Under Mandatory Obligation To Disclose Criminal Antecedents, Non-Disclosure Results In Erroneous Decisions: Andhra Pradesh High Court Judicial Decrees Cannot Be Set Aside By Administrative Orders After Decades; Long-Standing Revenue Entries Must Be Protected: Allahabad High Court 'Any Use Whatsoever' Includes Promotion & Events: Bombay High Court Restrains New Indian Express Group From Hosting Commercial Events Outside Southern States Reserved Category Candidates Who Qualify On Their Own Seniority Must Be Adjusted Against Unreserved Vacancies: Calcutta High Court Decree For Possession Can Be Passed If Landlord-Tenant Relationship & Termination Are Admitted; Unregistered Lease Is Month-To-Month: Delhi High Court Prosecution Against Co-Accused Not Sustainable When Main Accused Is Discharged On Same Facts: Jharkhand High Court Admission Of Handwriting On Account Statement Is Not Admission Of Its Contents; Corroborative Evidence Necessary To Prove Claim: Gujarat High Court Omission Of Label Defects In Food Inspector's Spot Memo Fatal To Prosecution For Misbranding: Himachal Pradesh High Court RBI Must Consult State Government, Not Just Registrar, To Supersede Co-operative Bank Board; Principles Of Natural Justice Excluded Under Section 36AAA: Kerala High Court Suit Filed Before IBC Proceedings Cannot Be Dismissed Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC; Section 96 Moratorium Only Stays Pending Actions: Calcutta High Court Senior Citizens Not Technologically Savvy Cannot Be Penalized For Not Checking Case Status On Court Website: Tripura High Court Telangana High Court Quashes Case Against CM Revanth Reddy Over 2019 Election Roadshow, Cites Bar Under Section 195 CrPC Maintenance Tribunal Orders Passed Without Mandated Three-Member Coram Are A Nullity: Punjab & Haryana High Court School Register Entry Regarding Date Of Birth Lacks Probative Value Unless Source Of Information Is Proved: Madhya Pradesh High Court Sets Aside POCSO Conviction Limitation Period For Specific Performance Starts From Date Of Refusal If No Fixed Date Stipulated In Agreement: Karnataka High Court Pensionary Benefits Not ‘Pecuniary Advantage’, Cannot Be Deducted From Income For Motor Accident Compensation: Punjab & Haryana High Court Will | Disinheriting Caring Spouse In Favour Of Non-Relatives Is An ‘Unnatural Disposition’ Raising Grave Suspicion: Supreme Court Registration Does Not Automatically Validate Will If Process Is Shrouded In Suspicion; Testator's Illiteracy Increases Burden On Propounder: Supreme Court Propounder Faces Heavy Burden Of Proof When Testator Is Illiterate; Registration Does Not Cure Unexplained Suspicious Circumstances: Supreme Court

Bullets of Unjustified Accusations Lead to Fatal Wounds in Matrimony: Delhi High Court Grants Divorce on Grounds of Cruelty

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Delhi High Court, led by Justices Suresh Kumar Kait and Neena Bansal Krishna, has granted divorce to Major Shashi Chauhan on the grounds of cruelty, under Section 13(1)(i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. This decision, pronounced on March 6, 2024, sets aside the previous judgment of the Family Court, which had dismissed Major Chauhan's divorce petition.

The Court assessed the case under the purview of mental cruelty as a valid ground for divorce. The bench emphasized, "Vindictiveness, vexation, and intolerance are the foes of coherent comprehension," underscoring the role of unjustified accusations in inflicting mental cruelty.

Major Shashi Chauhan and Major Ritu Bhasin, both serving in the Indian Army, had a prolonged courtship before marrying in February 2010. Soon, differences surfaced, primarily concerning dowry expectations and behavioral issues. The marriage saw a brief period of cohabitation, followed by prolonged separation and a slew of legal battles. Major Chauhan filed for divorce on grounds of cruelty, which was initially dismissed by the Family Court.

The High Court meticulously analyzed the couple's matrimonial life, allegations of cruelty, and subsequent legal proceedings. It noted that Major Bhasin failed to substantiate her allegations of cruelty and dowry harassment, instead resorting to filing multiple complaints against Major Chauhan, which either got dismissed or led to acquittal. These actions were seen as indicative of vindictiveness and mental cruelty. The Court also highlighted the long separation and lack of efforts for reconciliation, exacerbating the matrimonial discord.

Justice Neena Bansal Krishna observed, “The aggrieved person is entitled to avail the remedy under laws, but crossing the point of ‘no return’ becomes inevitable once engulfed in the rabbit hole of criminal litigations.”

Decision: Concluding that the marriage was beyond salvage, marred by irreconcilable differences, and continued legal disputes, the Court granted a decree of divorce to Major Chauhan, thereby dissolving the marriage.

Date of Decision: 06th March, 2024

Xxx vs xxx

Latest Legal News