Executing Court Must Conduct Full-Fledged Inquiry Under Order 21 Rule 97 CPC When Third-Party Objects To Possession: Supreme Court Administrative Lapse Of University Cannot Penalize Student By Denying Verification Of Academic Credentials: Supreme Court Professional Colleges Cannot Effect Mid-Course Fee Hikes; Fee Must Be Determined Before Admission Under AICTE Regulations: Supreme Court Compromise Decrees Under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC Must Be Given Full Effect, Courts Cannot Ignore Binding Settlements: Supreme Court Auction Of Public Resources | Rejection Of Highest Bid Requires Material Demonstrating Current Inadequacy And Cannot Rely Merely On Earlier Higher Bids: Supreme Court Section 19 PMLA | 'Immediately' In Section 19(2) Does Not Prescribe Fixed Timeline For Forwarding Arrest Material To Adjudicating Authority: Supreme Court Labour Court Must Grant Employer Opportunity To Lead Fresh Evidence After Domestic Inquiry Is Declared Unfair: Allahabad High Court Prosecution Permitted To Produce Additional Documents Under Section 242 CrPC Even At Trial Stage To Ensure Truth: Andhra Pradesh High Court Income Tax Act | Generation Of Surplus Does Not Disqualify Hospital From Philanthropic Exemption If Funds Are Applied To Charitable Objects: Bombay High Court Commercial Courts Act 2015 | Pre-Litigation Mediation Under Section 12A Is Not Mandatory In Urgent IP Infringement Suits: Delhi High Court Section 138 NI Act | Defence Witnesses Are Entitled To Equal Weightage As Prosecution Witnesses To Rebut Statutory Presumptions: Himachal Pradesh High Court Executing Deed Claiming Disputed Property Not 'False Document' Without Impersonation; Civil Disputes Can't Be Criminalised: Allahabad High Court Sessions Court Cannot Sentence Accused To Life Imprisonment 'Till Death' To Bar Remission Under Section 432 CrPC; Only Constitutional Courts Can: Supreme Court Anticipatory Bail | Merely Because Criminal Culpability Cannot Be Ruled Out In Civil Dispute, Pre-Arrest Bail Need Not Be Cancelled If Accused Cooperated: Supreme Court Section 498A IPC | Asking Daughter-In-Law To Do Household Chores Like Washing Clothes & Utensils Does Not Amount To 'Cruelty': Bombay High Court Investigation By Subordinate When SHO Is Informant Vitiates Trial For IPC Offences & Section 25 Arms Act: Allahabad High Court Section 125 CrPC | Adverse Finding Of Adultery Cannot Be Recorded Against Specifically Named Co-Adulterer Without Giving Opportunity Of Hearing: Allahabad High Court Section 306 IPC | Instigation Can Be Inferred From Continued Harassment, Absence Of Suicide Note No Ground For Discharge: Madhya Pradesh High Court Section 54 Wakf Act | Long Possession Confers No Right To Continue In Occupation If Encroachment Is Unauthorized: Himachal Pradesh High Court Special Court Cannot Direct Reinvestigation Under Guise Of Further Investigation When Accused Exonerated In Departmental Probe: J&K&L High Court Section 138 NI Act | Arraigning Company As Accused Imperative To Prosecute Managing Director Or Signatory: Himachal Pradesh High Court Section 20 Prevention Of Corruption Act | Statutory Presumption Cannot Be Triggered Without Proof Of Demand; Mere Recovery Insufficient: Himachal Pradesh High Court

Bullets of Unjustified Accusations Lead to Fatal Wounds in Matrimony: Delhi High Court Grants Divorce on Grounds of Cruelty

07 May 2024 2:49 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Delhi High Court, led by Justices Suresh Kumar Kait and Neena Bansal Krishna, has granted divorce to Major Shashi Chauhan on the grounds of cruelty, under Section 13(1)(i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. This decision, pronounced on March 6, 2024, sets aside the previous judgment of the Family Court, which had dismissed Major Chauhan's divorce petition.

The Court assessed the case under the purview of mental cruelty as a valid ground for divorce. The bench emphasized, "Vindictiveness, vexation, and intolerance are the foes of coherent comprehension," underscoring the role of unjustified accusations in inflicting mental cruelty.

Major Shashi Chauhan and Major Ritu Bhasin, both serving in the Indian Army, had a prolonged courtship before marrying in February 2010. Soon, differences surfaced, primarily concerning dowry expectations and behavioral issues. The marriage saw a brief period of cohabitation, followed by prolonged separation and a slew of legal battles. Major Chauhan filed for divorce on grounds of cruelty, which was initially dismissed by the Family Court.

The High Court meticulously analyzed the couple's matrimonial life, allegations of cruelty, and subsequent legal proceedings. It noted that Major Bhasin failed to substantiate her allegations of cruelty and dowry harassment, instead resorting to filing multiple complaints against Major Chauhan, which either got dismissed or led to acquittal. These actions were seen as indicative of vindictiveness and mental cruelty. The Court also highlighted the long separation and lack of efforts for reconciliation, exacerbating the matrimonial discord.

Justice Neena Bansal Krishna observed, “The aggrieved person is entitled to avail the remedy under laws, but crossing the point of ‘no return’ becomes inevitable once engulfed in the rabbit hole of criminal litigations.”

Decision: Concluding that the marriage was beyond salvage, marred by irreconcilable differences, and continued legal disputes, the Court granted a decree of divorce to Major Chauhan, thereby dissolving the marriage.

Date of Decision: 06th March, 2024

Xxx vs xxx

Latest Legal News