MACT | Fraud Vitiates All Judicial Acts, Even Without Specific Review Powers: Rajasthan High Court    |     Right of Private Defense Cannot Be Weighed in Golden Scales: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Appellant in Culpable Homicide Case    |     Pre-Arrest Bail Not a Right but an Exception: Himachal High Court Denied Bail In Dowry Death Case"    |     Service Law | Similarly Situated Employees Cannot Be Denied Equal Treatment: PH High Court Orders Regularization    |     Presumption of Innocence Remains Supreme Unless Clearly Overturned: PH High Court Affirming Acquittal    |     Any Physical Liaison with A Girl Of Less Than Eighteen Years Is A Strict Offense.: Patna High Court Reiterates Strict Stance On Sexual Offences Against Minors    |     Orissa High Court Rules Res Judicata Inapplicable When Multiple Appeals Arise from Same Judgment    |     Mandatory Section 80 Notice Cannot Be Bypassed Lightly:  Jammu & Kashmir High Court Returns Plaint for Non-Compliance    |     Bombay High Court Denies Permanent Lecturer Appointment for Failing to Meet UGC Eligibility Criteria at Time of Appointment    |     Deferred Cross-Examination Gave Time for Witness Tampering, Undermining Fair Trial: Allahabad High Court    |     Dowry Death | Presumption Under Section 113-B Not Applicable as No Proof of Cruelty Soon Before Death : Supreme Court    |     Land Acquisition | Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. (JAL) Liable for Compensation under Supplementary Award, Not Ultra-Tech Cement Ltd.: Supreme Court    |     Non-Mentioning of Bail Orders in Detention Reflects Clear Non-Application of Mind: J&K High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order    |     Conviction Under Arms Act and Criminal Conspiracy Quashed Due to Non-Seizure of Key Evidence and Failure to Prove Ownership of Box: Jharkhand High Court    |    

Both Punjab and Haryana Have Several Things to Cover Up: Punjab and Haryana HC Appoints Committee Headed by Retired Judge to Investigate Death of Subh Karan

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Punjab and Haryana High Court addressed the complex jurisdictional and investigative challenges surrounding the death of Subh Karan amid the farmer’s protests, highlighting the need for impartial inquiry beyond the purview of state influence.

The case revolves around the death of Subh Karan during farmer protests. Issues include delayed FIR registration, discrepancies in post-mortem reports, and contested jurisdiction between Punjab and Haryana. The use of force by police and injuries to personnel and protestors, coupled with claims of police excesses, underscored the urgency for an independent probe.

Jurisdictional Conflict: The court observed both states shirking responsibility for investigating Subh Karan’s death, necessitating an independent committee.

Use of Force: Assessments are needed to ascertain if police actions were proportional to the protest situation.

Compensation: The committee will also address compensation issues for Subh Karan’s death.

Process Transparency: The court emphasized a fair and impartial investigation, distancing from state-controlled probes.

The Court appointed a committee headed by Justice Ms. Jaishree Thakur, a retired judge, assisted by senior officers from both states, to oversee the investigation into Subh Karan’s death and related incidents. The committee will also examine the proportionality of police force and work on compensation aspects. The report is due within a month.

Date of Decision: March 7th, 2024         

Uday Pratap Singh Vs. UOI & Others, 

Similar News