MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Bail is the Rule, Jail an Exception: Kerala High Court Grants Bail After Investigation Completion in IPC and POCSO Case

01 October 2024 12:50 PM

By: sayum


Kerala High Court granted bail to Dhanesh K.V., the petitioner in Bail Appl. No. 6897 of 2024, who was charged with offences under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and POCSO Act for allegedly stalking and raping a woman after she attained majority. The court emphasized the principle that bail is the rule and jail is the exception, citing the completion of the investigation and the absence of prior criminal records as reasons for granting bail.

The petitioner, Dhanesh K.V., a neighbor of the survivor, was accused of stalking her during her minor years and subsequently raping her on June 24, 2024, after she had reached the age of majority. He was charged under Sections 354D(1), 376(2)(n), and 506 of the IPC and Section 12 read with Section 11(iv) of the POCSO Act. Dhanesh was arrested on July 16, 2024, and had been in judicial custody for 77 days at the time of the bail hearing. The investigation was completed, and the charge sheet was filed on August 20, 2024.

The key legal issue was whether Dhanesh should be granted bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) 2023, given the gravity of the allegations. The petitioner argued that since the survivor had attained majority at the time of the alleged incident, the POCSO Act would not apply. The defense also highlighted that the charges were vague and meant to harass the petitioner.

Justice C.S. Dias cited the Supreme Court’s rulings in Manish Sisodia v. Directorate of Enforcement (2024) and Prabir Purkayastha v. State (2024), which reiterated that bail should not be withheld as a form of punishment and that bail is the rule and jail is an exception. The court noted that the investigation was complete, and Dhanesh had no prior criminal history, making his further detention unnecessary.

"The petitioner’s further detention is unnecessary. Hence, I am inclined to allow the bail application but subject to stringent conditions."

The court set conditions, including regular appearances before the Investigating Officer, a ban on entering the police station limits of the survivor, and surrendering his passport.

The Kerala High Court granted bail to Dhanesh K.V., reaffirming the principle that personal liberty should not be curtailed unnecessarily. The court emphasized that bail should be granted unless there is a substantial reason to deny it, particularly when the investigation is complete and the accused has no prior criminal antecedents.

Date of Decision: September 30, 2024

Dhanesh K.V. v. State of Kerala​.

Latest Legal News