IT Act | Ambiguity in statutory notices undermines the principles of natural justice: Delhi High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeals Gauhati High Court Upholds Conviction Under NDPS Act: Procedural Lapses Insufficient to Overturn Case Himachal Pradesh High Court Acquits Murder Accused, Points to Possible Suicide Pact in "Tragic Love Affair" Tampering With Historical Documents To Support A Caste Claim Strikes At The Root Of Public Trust And Cannot Be Tolerated: Bombay High Court Offense Impacts Society as a Whole: Madras High Court Denies Bail in Cyber Harassment Case Custody disputes must be resolved in appropriate forums, and courts cannot intervene beyond legal frameworks in the guise of habeas corpus jurisdiction: Kerala High Court Insubordination Is A Contagious Malady In Any Employment And More So In Public Service : Karnataka High Court imposes Rs. 10,000 fine on Tribunal staff for frivolous petition A Show Cause Notice Issued Without Jurisdiction Cannot Withstand Judicial Scrutiny: AP High Court Sets Aside Rs. 75 Lakh Stamp Duty Demand Timely Action is Key: P&H HC Upholds Lawful Retirement at 58 for Class-III Employees Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 Not Applicable to Civil Court Orders: Patna High Court Uttarakhand High Court Dissolves Marriage Citing Irretrievable Breakdown, Acknowledges Cruelty Due to Prolonged Separation Prosecution Must Prove Common Object For An Unlawful Assembly - Conviction Cannot Rest On Assumptions: Telangana High Court Limitation | Litigants Cannot Entirely Blame Advocates for Procedural Delays: Supreme Court Family's Criminal Past Cannot Dictate Passport Eligibility: Madhya Pradesh High Court Double Presumption of Innocence Bolsters Acquittal When Evidence Falls Short: Calcutta High Court Upholds Essential Commodities Act TIP Not Mandatory if Witness Testimony  Credible - Recovery of Weapon Not Essential for Conviction Under Section 397 IPC: Delhi High Court University’s Failure to Amend Statutes for EWS Reservation Renders Advertisement Unsustainable: High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh Quashes EWS Reservation in University Recruitment Process

Bail is the Rule, Jail an Exception: Kerala High Court Grants Bail After Investigation Completion in IPC and POCSO Case

01 October 2024 12:50 PM

By: sayum


Kerala High Court granted bail to Dhanesh K.V., the petitioner in Bail Appl. No. 6897 of 2024, who was charged with offences under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and POCSO Act for allegedly stalking and raping a woman after she attained majority. The court emphasized the principle that bail is the rule and jail is the exception, citing the completion of the investigation and the absence of prior criminal records as reasons for granting bail.

The petitioner, Dhanesh K.V., a neighbor of the survivor, was accused of stalking her during her minor years and subsequently raping her on June 24, 2024, after she had reached the age of majority. He was charged under Sections 354D(1), 376(2)(n), and 506 of the IPC and Section 12 read with Section 11(iv) of the POCSO Act. Dhanesh was arrested on July 16, 2024, and had been in judicial custody for 77 days at the time of the bail hearing. The investigation was completed, and the charge sheet was filed on August 20, 2024.

The key legal issue was whether Dhanesh should be granted bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) 2023, given the gravity of the allegations. The petitioner argued that since the survivor had attained majority at the time of the alleged incident, the POCSO Act would not apply. The defense also highlighted that the charges were vague and meant to harass the petitioner.

Justice C.S. Dias cited the Supreme Court’s rulings in Manish Sisodia v. Directorate of Enforcement (2024) and Prabir Purkayastha v. State (2024), which reiterated that bail should not be withheld as a form of punishment and that bail is the rule and jail is an exception. The court noted that the investigation was complete, and Dhanesh had no prior criminal history, making his further detention unnecessary.

"The petitioner’s further detention is unnecessary. Hence, I am inclined to allow the bail application but subject to stringent conditions."

The court set conditions, including regular appearances before the Investigating Officer, a ban on entering the police station limits of the survivor, and surrendering his passport.

The Kerala High Court granted bail to Dhanesh K.V., reaffirming the principle that personal liberty should not be curtailed unnecessarily. The court emphasized that bail should be granted unless there is a substantial reason to deny it, particularly when the investigation is complete and the accused has no prior criminal antecedents.

Date of Decision: September 30, 2024

Dhanesh K.V. v. State of Kerala​.

Similar News