MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Auction Sale Bound by Final Outcome of Appeal – Delhi High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court has held that the auction sale of a property will remain bound by the final outcome of the pending appeal. The decision came in the case of Sushil Kumar Chadha vs Canara Bank & Ors., concerning the release of title deeds of a property auctioned by Canara Bank.

Legal Point of Judgement: The court’s judgement revolved around the legality of the auction sale of a property and the obligations of both the auction purchaser and the bank in such proceedings. Central to this was the compliance with Rules 60 and 61 of the Second Schedule of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Facts and Issues: The petitioner, Sushil Kumar Chadha, acquired a property through an auction sale which was later challenged by the deceased original owners in an appeal before the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT). Despite being in physical possession since 2008, the legality of the auction and subsequent sales came under scrutiny.

Misrepresentation and Legal Compliance: The court observed that the petitioner may have misrepresented the status of the auction sale and failed to comply with the court’s earlier direction to inform subsequent purchasers about the pending litigation.

Role of Canara Bank: The court scrutinized the bank’s conduct, especially regarding its incorrect submission about the appeal’s status as abated, highlighting the need for strict compliance with legal procedures in auction sales.

Expedited Appeal Hearing: Recognizing the lengthy delay since the appeal’s filing in 2008, the court directed an expedited hearing of the pending appeal.

Decision of the Judgement: The court ruled that the auction sale of the property shall remain bound by the final outcome of the pending appeal. It was directed that any further sale of the property during the pendency of the appeal should clearly mention the ongoing litigation in the sale documents. The court disposed of the related applications and dismissed the contempt petition, finding no grounds for initiating contempt proceedings.

Date of Decision – 19th February, 2024

Shri Sushil Kumar Chadha vs Canara Bank & Ors.

Latest Legal News