Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Auction Sale Bound by Final Outcome of Appeal – Delhi High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court has held that the auction sale of a property will remain bound by the final outcome of the pending appeal. The decision came in the case of Sushil Kumar Chadha vs Canara Bank & Ors., concerning the release of title deeds of a property auctioned by Canara Bank.

Legal Point of Judgement: The court’s judgement revolved around the legality of the auction sale of a property and the obligations of both the auction purchaser and the bank in such proceedings. Central to this was the compliance with Rules 60 and 61 of the Second Schedule of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Facts and Issues: The petitioner, Sushil Kumar Chadha, acquired a property through an auction sale which was later challenged by the deceased original owners in an appeal before the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT). Despite being in physical possession since 2008, the legality of the auction and subsequent sales came under scrutiny.

Misrepresentation and Legal Compliance: The court observed that the petitioner may have misrepresented the status of the auction sale and failed to comply with the court’s earlier direction to inform subsequent purchasers about the pending litigation.

Role of Canara Bank: The court scrutinized the bank’s conduct, especially regarding its incorrect submission about the appeal’s status as abated, highlighting the need for strict compliance with legal procedures in auction sales.

Expedited Appeal Hearing: Recognizing the lengthy delay since the appeal’s filing in 2008, the court directed an expedited hearing of the pending appeal.

Decision of the Judgement: The court ruled that the auction sale of the property shall remain bound by the final outcome of the pending appeal. It was directed that any further sale of the property during the pendency of the appeal should clearly mention the ongoing litigation in the sale documents. The court disposed of the related applications and dismissed the contempt petition, finding no grounds for initiating contempt proceedings.

Date of Decision – 19th February, 2024

Shri Sushil Kumar Chadha vs Canara Bank & Ors.

Latest Legal News