'Promotion Effected Long Ago Not To Be Disturbed': Supreme Court Sets Aside HC Order Quashing 13-Year-Old Promotion; Holds 'Laying Rules' Directory Not Mandatory "Mere Oral Assertion Or 'Data Loss' Letter Not Enough To Prove Driving Licence Validity; Owner Has Strict Duty To Ensure Renewal": Supreme Court Reinstates Insurer's Non-Liability, Applies 'Pay & Recover' Principle "Zero Tolerance To Corruption": Supreme Court Reinstates FIRs Against Karnataka Cops, Slams High Court For 'Mini-Trial' & Exceeding S.482 CrPC Powers ‘Ancillary Services Don't Override Carriage’: Supreme Court Upholds 7.5% Presumptive Income For Cruise Operators Under Section 44B IT Act, Rejects Revenue's Higher Tax Claim Division Bench Refuses To Quash FIR, Holds It Cannot Nullify Single Judge's Final Order Directing Registration Of Case: Allahabad High Court High Court Leave Under Clause XII Doesn't Protect Transferred Suits; Section 16 CPC Strictly Applies To City Civil Court In 'Suits For Land': Bombay High Court Joint Account Holder Who Didn't Sign The Dishonoured Cheque Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 138 NI Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Suits Cannot Be Consolidated If Parties, Properties, And Causes Of Action Are Different: Telangana High Court P&H High Court Halts All Construction In Mohali's Shivalik Foothills Over Failure To Demarcate 'Forest Land', Bars Land Sale No Embargo On Issuing Single Statutory Notice Under Section 138 NI Act For Multiple Dishonoured Cheques: Orissa High Court District Collector Has No Jurisdiction Under CrPC To Order Reopening Of Investigation Or Recall Of Closure Report: Madhya Pradesh High Court No Exclusive Monopoly Over Geographical Term 'Malabar' In Isolation; Protection Limited To Registered Composite Marks: Kerala High Court Person In 'De Facto' Control Is A Promoter Under Companies Act Even If Designated As Professional Director: Karnataka High Court Supreme Court Urges Mandatory Animal Tagging, Strict Enforcement of Gaushala Laws To Tackle Stray Cattle Crisis; Holds Owners Accountable "Don't Render Victims Remediless": Supreme Court Slams High Court For Dismissing Plea Over Stray Bull Death, Awards ₹15 Lakh Compensation Supreme Court Red-Flags 'Unregulated Shadow Work' of Private Investigators, Calls For Legislative Overhaul on Digital Evidence & Privacy Rights 125 CrPC | Wife 'Not Entitled To Interim Maintenance If Adultery Established Ex Facie': Supreme Court Evidence Against Absconder Invalid Without Prior S.299 CrPC Order: SC Acquits Murder Accused Ad Valorem Court Fee Mandatory For Section 54 Appeals Challenging Land Acquisition Awards: Supreme Court

Appellate Courts Must Uphold Duty of Care in Appeals Against Acquittal -Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India underscored the importance of the duty of appellate courts in appeals against acquittal. The judgment, delivered by a bench comprising Justice Abhay S. Oka and Justice Sanjay Karol, emphasized the need for meticulous scrutiny of evidence and adherence to established principles.

The case in question involved the conviction of individuals under Part I of Section 304 and Section 324 of the Indian Penal Code, read with Section 149. The appellants had previously been acquitted by the Trial Court, but the High Court overturned this decision, leading to an appeal to the Supreme Court.

The key takeaway from the judgment lies in the Court's observation regarding the role of the Appellate Court. The judgment states, "Appellate Jurisdiction – Duty of the Appellate Court in appeals against acquittal – Re-appreciation of evidence – Possibility of the Trial Court's view – High Court's failure to record reasons and findings – Appellate Court's duty to consider the reliability of prosecution witnesses and their demeanour."

In essence, the Appellate Court's responsibility is not merely to assess whether the Trial Court's view is correct or incorrect but to determine whether the Trial Court's view is a possible one based on the evidence at hand. This principle is pivotal when dealing with appeals against acquittals.

Furthermore, the judgment highlighted the significance of considering the demeanour of witnesses in the context of reliability. It noted that Trial Courts often have the advantage of closely observing witnesses during their testimony, which adds depth to their assessment of witness credibility.

The case also raised concerns about the investigation process, specifically regarding a grievous injury suffered by one of the accused. The judgment pointed out a serious lacuna in the prosecution's case due to the failure to investigate this injury thoroughly.

Supreme Court set aside the impugned High Court judgment and emphasized that the Trial Court's conclusions were possible based on the available evidence. As a result, the appellants were directed to be set at liberty unless detained in connection with another case.

Date of Decision: September 26, 2023

D. SUNDARA & ORS. vs STATE OF KARNATAKA       

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/26-Sep-2023_H.K.MARIYAPPA_Vs_State.pdf"]

Latest Legal News