Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal

Anticipatory Bail Dismissed - Non-Disclosure of Crucial Facts: Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent decision, the Supreme Court of India dismissed three separate anticipatory bail appeals filed by MD Kamran and others against the State of Bihar and another. The appeals were directed against the orders of the High Court of Judicature at Patna, which had denied anticipatory bail to the appellants in a case involving multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code, including Sections 307, 147, 148, 149, 324, 325, 326, 380, 341, 342, 504, and 506.

The Supreme Court, in its order dated September 22, 2023, granted leave to consider the appeals but ultimately found that the appellants had failed to disclose crucial facts regarding the initiation of proceedings under Section 82 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.), and the subsequent dismissal of their Revision Petition against the same.

The Court's observations were clear: "Non-disclosure of relevant facts and factors in the Special Leave Petitions and, at any rate, when this Court passed the interim order of protection, would and should disentitle them to any relief at this stage. There cannot be any doubt with respect to the position that a person approaching this Court with no clean hands does not deserve any leniency or favor from this Court."

This decision underscores the importance of full and honest disclosure in legal proceedings, especially when seeking anticipatory bail. The Court's decision reaffirms the principle that individuals approaching the court with incomplete or misleading information may not be entitled to pre-arrest bail.

The appellants were represented by a team of advocates, including Mr. Randhir Kumar Ojha, Mr. Devashish Bharuka, Ms. Sarvshree, and others. On the other side, the State of Bihar was represented by Mr. Devashish Bharuka, Mr. Samir Ali Khan, Mr. Pranjal Sharma, and several other advocates.

This ruling serves as a reminder to litigants and legal practitioners about the importance of transparency and full disclosure in legal proceedings, as failing to do so may have significant consequences on the outcome of the case.

Date of Decision: September 22, 2023

MD KAMRAN & ORS. vs THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR. 

Latest Legal News