Prolonged Pre-Trial Detention and Right to Liberty Cannot Be Ignored” - Punjab & Haryana High Court Emphasizes Bail as the Rule Taxation Law | Andhra Pradesh High Court Rules Hotel’s Expenditures on Carpets, Mattresses, and Lampshades are Deductible as Current Expenditures Orissa High Court Upholds Disengagement of Teacher for Unauthorized Absence and Suppression of Facts In Disciplined Forces, Transfers are an Administrative Necessity; Judicial Interference is Limited to Cases of Proven Mala Fide: Patna High Court Act Of Judge, When Free From Oblique Motive, Cannot Be Questioned: Madhya Pradesh High Court Quashes Disciplinary Proceedings Against Additional Collector Registration Act | False Statements in Conveyance Documents Qualify for Prosecution Under Registration Act: Kerala High Court When Junior is Promoted, Senior’s Case Cannot be Deferred Unjustly: Karnataka High Court in Sealed Cover Promotion Dispute Medical Training Standards Cannot Be Lowered, Even for Disability’ in MBBS Admission Case: Delhi HC Suspicion, However Strong It May Be, Cannot Take Place Of Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds Acquittal No Detention Order Can Rely on Grounds Already Quashed: High Court Sets Precedent on Preventive Detention Limits Tenant's Claims of Hardship and Landlord's Alternate Accommodations Insufficient to Prevent Eviction: Allahabad HC Further Custodial Detention May Not Be Necessary: Calcutta High Court Grants Bail in Murder Case Citing Lack of Specific Evidence High Court, As A Constitutional Court Of Record, Possesses The Inherent Power To Correct Its Own Record: Bombay High Court A Fresh Section 11 Arbitration Petition Without Liberty Granted at the Time of Withdrawal is Not Maintainable: Supreme Court; Principles of Order 23 CPC Applied Adult Sexual Predators Ought Not To Be Dealt With Leniency Or Extended Misplaced Sympathy: Sikkim High Court Retired Employee Entitled to Interest on Delayed Leave Encashment Despite Absence of Statutory Provision: Delhi HC Punjab and Haryana High Court Grants Full Disability Pension and Service Element for Life to Army Veteran Taxation Law | Director Must Be Given Notice to Prove Lack of Negligence: Telangana High Court Quashes Order Against Director in Tax Recovery Case High Court of Uttarakhand Acquits Defendants in High-Profile Murder Case, Cites Lack of Evidence In Cases of Financial Distress, Imposing A Mandatory Deposit Under Negotiable Instruments Act May Jeopardize Appellant’s Right To Appeal: Rajasthan High Court Patna High Court Acquits Accused, Questions “Capacity of Victim to Make Coherent Statement” with 100% Burn Injuries High Court of Himachal Pradesh Dismisses Bail Plea in ₹200 Crore Scholarship Scam: Rajdeep Singh Case Execution of Conveyance Ends Arbitration Clause; Appeal for Arbitration Rejected: Bombay High Court

"Amicable Settlement Leads to Quashing of FIR: Gujarat High Court Emphasizes on 'Preventing Abuse of Process of Court'"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Gujarat High Court has underscored the importance of preventing the abuse of court processes in criminal matters, particularly when parties reach an amicable settlement. The judgment was delivered on March 12, 2024, in the case of Mega Grain Trading Pvt. Ltd. and Others vs. State of Gujarat and Another.

Presided over by Justice Hasmukh D. Suthar, the court allowed the application for quashing the FIR and subsequent proceedings against Mega Grain Trading Pvt. Ltd. and others. The FIR, lodged for the offenses under Sections 406, 420, and 114 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, stemmed from a commercial dispute that turned out to be a miscommunication between the parties involved.

Justice Suthar, in his judgment, observed, "The criminal courts are not meant to be used for settling scores or pressurize parties to settle civil disputes." This remark came in light of the mutual settlement reached by the disputing parties and the affidavit filed by the original complainant, stating no objections to quashing the proceedings.

The case revolved around a commercial transaction for caraway seeds, which resulted in the filing of an FIR when the goods received were found to be waste material. However, during the course of the legal proceedings, the parties reached an amicable resolution, prompting the move to quash the FIR.

Referring to several landmark decisions, including Sarabjit Kaur vs. State of Punjab & Anr. and State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal, Justice Suthar highlighted the delicate balance between criminal prosecution for cheating and the mere breach of contract. He emphasized that criminal prosecution should not be initiated merely on the allegation of a failed promise.

In conclusion, the court decided to quash the FIR C.R. No.11205032231429 of 2023 registered at Mundra Police Station, Kutch-Bhuj, and all consequential proceedings. The decision underlines the judiciary's stance on not allowing the criminal justice system to be used as a tool for settling civil disputes, especially when an amicable settlement is reached between the parties.

Date of Decision: 12-03-2024

MEGA GRAIN TRADING PVT. LTD. AND OTHERS VS STATE OF GUJARAT

Similar News