Sale Deeds Must Be Interpreted Literally When the Language is Clear and Unambiguous: Supreme Court    |     Non-Signatory Can Be Bound by Arbitration Clause Based on Conduct and Involvement: Supreme Court    |     Right to Passport is a Fundamental Right, Denial Without Justification Violates Article 21: Allahabad High Court    |     Insurance Company's Liability Remains Despite Policy Cancellation Due to Dishonored Cheque: Calcutta High Court    |     Deductions Under Sections 36(1)(vii) and 36(1)(viia) of the Income Tax Act Are Independent and Cannot Be Curtailed: Bombay High Court    |     Diary Entries Cannot Alone Implicate the Accused Without Corroborative Evidence: Supreme Court Upholds Discharge of Accused in Corruption Case    |     MACT | Fraud Vitiates All Judicial Acts, Even Without Specific Review Powers: Rajasthan High Court    |     Right of Private Defense Cannot Be Weighed in Golden Scales: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Appellant in Culpable Homicide Case    |     If Two Reasonable Conclusions Are Possible, Acquittal Should Not Be Disturbed: Supreme Court    |     Kalelkar Award Explicitly Provides Holiday Benefits for Temporary Employees, Not Subject to Government Circulars: Supreme Court Upholds Holiday and Overtime Pay    |     NDPS | Homogeneous Mixing of Bulk Drugs Essential for Valid Sampling Under NDPS Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court    |     Pre-Arrest Bail Not a Right but an Exception: Himachal High Court Denied Bail In Dowry Death Case"    |     POCSO | Scholar Register Is Sufficient to Determine Victim’s Age in POCSO Cases: Madhya Pradesh High Court    |     Abuse of Official Position in Appointments: Prima Facie Case for Criminal Misconduct: Delhi High Court Upholds Framing of Charges Against Swati Maliwal in DCW Corruption Case    |     Service Law | Similarly Situated Employees Cannot Be Denied Equal Treatment: PH High Court Orders Regularization    |     Presumption of Innocence Remains Supreme Unless Clearly Overturned: PH High Court Affirming Acquittal    |     Any Physical Liaison with A Girl Of Less Than Eighteen Years Is A Strict Offense.: Patna High Court Reiterates Strict Stance On Sexual Offences Against Minors    |     Orissa High Court Rules Res Judicata Inapplicable When Multiple Appeals Arise from Same Judgment    |     Mandatory Section 80 Notice Cannot Be Bypassed Lightly:  Jammu & Kashmir High Court Returns Plaint for Non-Compliance    |     Bombay High Court Denies Permanent Lecturer Appointment for Failing to Meet UGC Eligibility Criteria at Time of Appointment    |     Deferred Cross-Examination Gave Time for Witness Tampering, Undermining Fair Trial: Allahabad High Court    |     Dowry Death | Presumption Under Section 113-B Not Applicable as No Proof of Cruelty Soon Before Death : Supreme Court    |     Gift Deed Voided as Son Fails to Care for Elderly Mother, Karnataka High Court Asserts ‘Implied Duty’ in Property Transfers    |     Denial of a legible 164 statement is a denial of a fair trial guaranteed by the Constitution of India: Kerala High Court    |     Safety Shoes Used as Weapon Meets Mens Rea Requirement for Murder: Rajasthan HC on Bail Denial    |     Fraud on the Courts Cannot Be Tolerated: Supreme Court Ordered CBI Investigation Against Advocate    |     Land Acquisition | Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. (JAL) Liable for Compensation under Supplementary Award, Not Ultra-Tech Cement Ltd.: Supreme Court    |     Non-Mentioning of Bail Orders in Detention Reflects Clear Non-Application of Mind: J&K High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order    |     Conviction Under Arms Act and Criminal Conspiracy Quashed Due to Non-Seizure of Key Evidence and Failure to Prove Ownership of Box: Jharkhand High Court    |     Prima Facie Proof of Valid Marriage Required Before Awarding Maintenance Under Section 125 Cr.P.C: Calcutta High Court Sets Aside Interim Maintenance Order    |    

Acquittal in Criminal Proceedings Doesn't Automatically Lead to Acquittal or Discharge in Departmental Proceedings: Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


On 3 Oct. 2023 , the Supreme Court of India has issued a groundbreaking judgment that underscores a crucial principle in employment disputes. The verdict emphasizes that acquittal in criminal proceedings does not automatically lead to acquittal or discharge in departmental proceedings, highlighting the distinct nature and objectives of both legal processes.

The ruling stemmed from an employment dispute brought before the Supreme Court. The case involved the interpretation of clause 4 of the Memorandum of Settlement dated 10th April 2002, which raised questions about whether it bars departmental proceedings when criminal proceedings for similar offenses are pending against an employee.

The bench of Hon'ble Justices Hrishikesh Roy and Sanjay Karol meticulously examined the legal aspects of the case. They clarified that acquittal in criminal proceedings should not be seen as conclusive evidence of innocence in departmental matters. The judgment underscores that the two proceedings—criminal and departmental—are entirely different in nature, operate in different fields, and serve different objectives.

The Supreme Court's decision reaffirmed that departmental proceedings can continue even if an individual has been acquitted in a criminal case related to the same allegations. The court stressed that the standard of proof, mode of inquiry, and rules governing these two types of proceedings are significantly distinct and separate.

The judgment also highlighted that the completion of trial in criminal cases should occur within a reasonable timeframe. It should not be used as a tactic to indefinitely stall departmental proceedings. Additionally, the court mentioned that departmental proceedings should not be unduly and unjustly delayed.

This landmark judgment has far-reaching implications for employment disputes in India, providing clarity on the relationship between criminal and departmental proceedings. It emphasizes that each case must be considered individually, taking into account various factors, and that acquittal in criminal proceedings does not automatically shield an employee from disciplinary actions in their workplace.

Date of Decision: October 3, 2023 

STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS.   vs P. ZADENGA     

Similar News