Illegal Excavation | State Must Probe Offences Under MMDR & Forest Acts Along With General Penal Law, File Supplementary Chargesheet: Supreme Court Accused In Custody For 30 Months Out Of Maximum 3-Year Sentence Entitled To Bail Despite Criminal Antecedents If Trial Protracted: Supreme Court Section 17A PC Act | Prior Approval Not Required To Investigate Public Servant Accused Of Demanding Bribe: Supreme Court Town Planning Residential Zoning Cannot Override Bar On Patta Over Water Bodies; State Must Allot Alternate Site Before Demolishing Flats: Supreme Court Section 4A Census Act | Private Unaided Schools Not 'Local Authority', Teachers Cannot Be Requisitioned For Census Duty: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Interim Stay SC/ST Act | Magistrate Recording Statements Under Sections 200 & 202 CrPC Before Transfer Is Curable Irregularity, Won't Vitiate Trial: Allahabad High Court Ad Interim Attachment Order Under Criminal Law (Amendment) Ordinance, 1944 Lapses Automatically After One Year If Cognizance Not Taken: Andhra Pradesh High Court Section 306 IPC | Instigation Can Be Inferred From Continued Harassment, Absence Of Suicide Note No Ground For Discharge: Madhya Pradesh High Court Regular Bail May Be Granted Subject To Verification Of Past Criminal Antecedents In Property Offences: Orissa High Court Litigant Should Not Suffer For Counsel’s Illness: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Order Closing Evidence DV Act | Interim Stay Of Residence Order By Appellate Court Cannot Deprive Aged Parent Of Dignity And Shelter: Madras High Court Section 13(1)(ia) Hindu Marriage Act | Mere Matrimonial Discord And Incompatibility Do Not Constitute 'Cruelty': Karnataka High Court Section 482 BNSS | Grant Of Anticipatory Bail Where Custodial Interrogation Is Unnecessary Despite Allegations Of Large-Scale Financial Irregularities: Kerala High Court Manipulated Seizure Memos and Inconsistent Testimonies Vitiate Prosecution Case Under NDPS Act: Himachal Pradesh High Court Section 15 & 31 J&K Evacuee Property Act 1949 Do Not Bar Civil Court's Jurisdiction In Injunction Suits Between Private Parties: J&K High Court Section 25 Hindu Marriage Act | Court Can Grant Permanent Alimony Even On Oral Application While Passing Divorce Decree: Jharkhand High Court Co-Accused Has No Legal Right To Be Heard At The Stage Of Tendering Pardon: Delhi High Court Sale Proceeds Of Flats Constructed For Leasing Out Must Be Taxed As 'Capital Gains' And Not Business Income Merely Because Sale Followed Receipt Of OC: Bombay High Court Section 138 NI Act | Accused Cannot Seek Expert Opinion To Rebut Statutory Presumption When Signature On Cheque Is Admitted: Gujarat High Court Recruitment Rules Framed Under Administrative Necessity Are Not Subject To Norms Designed For Other Central Government Hospitals: Delhi High Court

Accepting Authority's Timeliness in Appraisal Report Submission Upheld by Supreme Court; High Court's Reassessment of IAS Ashok Khemka Officer's Performance Deemed Inappropriate

07 May 2024 2:49 AM

By: Admin


The Supreme Court of India, in a significant judgment, dealt with the issue of timeliness and authority discretion in the completion of Performance Appraisal Reports (PAR) under the All India Services (Performance Appraisal Report) Rules, 2007. The apex court evaluated the legality of delays in the submission of appraisal reports of IAS Ashok Khemka and the extent of judicial intervention permissible in administrative decisions.

The case revolved around the PAR of an IAS officer, Mr. Ashok Khemka, and involved differences in appraisal grades given by various authorities. The High Court of Punjab and Haryana had previously set aside an order by the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), leading to the current appeal. The key issues were:

Whether the delay by the Accepting Authority in finalizing the PAR was in breach of the PAR Rules.

The appropriateness of the High Court's intervention in re-evaluating the officer's performance.

Timeliness of Performance Appraisal Report: The Court held that while the Accepting Authority delayed the PAR, it was still within the ultimate timeframe of Rule 5(1) of the PAR Rules. This delay, per the Court, did not invalidate the appraisal.

Judiciary's Interference in Administrative Decisions: The Supreme Court underscored that the judiciary should restrain from delving into the merits of administrative decisions, particularly those requiring specialized expertise, like evaluating an IAS officer's performance.

The Supreme Court reversed the High Court’s decision, restoring the assessment and grades given by the Accepting Authority in the PAR. The Court directed the Accepting Authority to resolve any pending representations within 60 days.

Date of Decision: March 11, 2024

The State of Haryana vs. Ashok Khemka & Anr.

Latest Legal News