Bail Applicant Under Mandatory Obligation To Disclose Criminal Antecedents, Non-Disclosure Results In Erroneous Decisions: Andhra Pradesh High Court Judicial Decrees Cannot Be Set Aside By Administrative Orders After Decades; Long-Standing Revenue Entries Must Be Protected: Allahabad High Court 'Any Use Whatsoever' Includes Promotion & Events: Bombay High Court Restrains New Indian Express Group From Hosting Commercial Events Outside Southern States Reserved Category Candidates Who Qualify On Their Own Seniority Must Be Adjusted Against Unreserved Vacancies: Calcutta High Court Decree For Possession Can Be Passed If Landlord-Tenant Relationship & Termination Are Admitted; Unregistered Lease Is Month-To-Month: Delhi High Court Prosecution Against Co-Accused Not Sustainable When Main Accused Is Discharged On Same Facts: Jharkhand High Court Admission Of Handwriting On Account Statement Is Not Admission Of Its Contents; Corroborative Evidence Necessary To Prove Claim: Gujarat High Court Omission Of Label Defects In Food Inspector's Spot Memo Fatal To Prosecution For Misbranding: Himachal Pradesh High Court RBI Must Consult State Government, Not Just Registrar, To Supersede Co-operative Bank Board; Principles Of Natural Justice Excluded Under Section 36AAA: Kerala High Court Suit Filed Before IBC Proceedings Cannot Be Dismissed Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC; Section 96 Moratorium Only Stays Pending Actions: Calcutta High Court Senior Citizens Not Technologically Savvy Cannot Be Penalized For Not Checking Case Status On Court Website: Tripura High Court Telangana High Court Quashes Case Against CM Revanth Reddy Over 2019 Election Roadshow, Cites Bar Under Section 195 CrPC Maintenance Tribunal Orders Passed Without Mandated Three-Member Coram Are A Nullity: Punjab & Haryana High Court School Register Entry Regarding Date Of Birth Lacks Probative Value Unless Source Of Information Is Proved: Madhya Pradesh High Court Sets Aside POCSO Conviction Limitation Period For Specific Performance Starts From Date Of Refusal If No Fixed Date Stipulated In Agreement: Karnataka High Court Pensionary Benefits Not ‘Pecuniary Advantage’, Cannot Be Deducted From Income For Motor Accident Compensation: Punjab & Haryana High Court Will | Disinheriting Caring Spouse In Favour Of Non-Relatives Is An ‘Unnatural Disposition’ Raising Grave Suspicion: Supreme Court Registration Does Not Automatically Validate Will If Process Is Shrouded In Suspicion; Testator's Illiteracy Increases Burden On Propounder: Supreme Court Propounder Faces Heavy Burden Of Proof When Testator Is Illiterate; Registration Does Not Cure Unexplained Suspicious Circumstances: Supreme Court

Absence of Prima Facie Case and Prolonged Custody Key for Bail Grant - Allahabad High Court in UAPA Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Lucknow, March  2024: The Allahabad High Court, in a landmark decision, has granted bail to Masood, in the case titled Masood Vs. The State Of U.P., underlining the absence of a prima facie case against the appellant and the significance of prolonged custody. The Bench comprising Hon'ble Attau Rahman Masoodi, J., and Hon'ble Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I, J., delivered the judgment on March 12, 2024, in Criminal Appeal No. - 54 of 2023, reversing the order dated 06.12.2022 that had previously denied bail to Masood.

The crucial legal aspect of the judgment revolved around the appellant's entitlement to bail under Section 21(4) of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008, amidst charges under the IPC, UAPA, and IT Act. The judgment specifically dealt with the absence of a prima facie case against Masood and his right to bail considering his extended period in custody.

The appellant, Masood, faced accusations under various stringent laws, including the IPC, UAPA, and IT Act, leading to his prolonged incarceration since October 5, 2020. The appeal was centered on the ground that there was no substantive evidence linking Masood to the alleged offences, which echoed the circumstances under which co-accused were previously granted bail.

The Court scrupulously examined the allegations, observing that Masood was not linked to any terrorist organization nor involved in any activity warranting charges under the stringent sections of the UAPA and IT Act. It was noted, "The allegations made in the F.I.R. and the contents of the case diary...clearly evince that accusation made against the appellant is, prima facie, false."

Granting the appeal, the Court allowed Masood's bail, emphasizing the parity in treatment with the co-accused who had been granted bail and the undue length of Masood's custody. The bail was subject to several conditions, including a personal bond, restricted travel, and instructions not to influence witnesses or evidence. The Court clarified that this order should not influence the trial proceedings.

Date of Decision: 12th March 2024

Masood Vs. The State Of U.P.

Latest Legal News