Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Absence of Prima Facie Case and Prolonged Custody Key for Bail Grant - Allahabad High Court in UAPA Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Lucknow, March  2024: The Allahabad High Court, in a landmark decision, has granted bail to Masood, in the case titled Masood Vs. The State Of U.P., underlining the absence of a prima facie case against the appellant and the significance of prolonged custody. The Bench comprising Hon'ble Attau Rahman Masoodi, J., and Hon'ble Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I, J., delivered the judgment on March 12, 2024, in Criminal Appeal No. - 54 of 2023, reversing the order dated 06.12.2022 that had previously denied bail to Masood.

The crucial legal aspect of the judgment revolved around the appellant's entitlement to bail under Section 21(4) of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008, amidst charges under the IPC, UAPA, and IT Act. The judgment specifically dealt with the absence of a prima facie case against Masood and his right to bail considering his extended period in custody.

The appellant, Masood, faced accusations under various stringent laws, including the IPC, UAPA, and IT Act, leading to his prolonged incarceration since October 5, 2020. The appeal was centered on the ground that there was no substantive evidence linking Masood to the alleged offences, which echoed the circumstances under which co-accused were previously granted bail.

The Court scrupulously examined the allegations, observing that Masood was not linked to any terrorist organization nor involved in any activity warranting charges under the stringent sections of the UAPA and IT Act. It was noted, "The allegations made in the F.I.R. and the contents of the case diary...clearly evince that accusation made against the appellant is, prima facie, false."

Granting the appeal, the Court allowed Masood's bail, emphasizing the parity in treatment with the co-accused who had been granted bail and the undue length of Masood's custody. The bail was subject to several conditions, including a personal bond, restricted travel, and instructions not to influence witnesses or evidence. The Court clarified that this order should not influence the trial proceedings.

Date of Decision: 12th March 2024

Masood Vs. The State Of U.P.

Latest Legal News