At the Stage of Framing Charge, Presumption Suffices; Suicide Note and Grave Suspicion Enough: Allahabad High Court Refuses to Quash Charge Under Section 306 IPC 173 CrPC | Framing of Charge Marks End of Investigation—Complainant Cannot Reopen Probe Merely by Citing Police Lapses: Bombay High Court Recovery Alone Cannot Prove Guilt: Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Photos, Videos Must Go: Supreme Court Binds Warring Spouses to Clean Up Social Media in Matrimonial Settlement Standard for Bail Under Section 319 CrPC Is Higher Than Framing of Charge, But Short of Conviction: Supreme Court Grants Bail to Accused Summoned Mid-Trial State Cannot Arbitrarily Deny Subsidies to 'New Industrial Units' by Retrospectively Applying Expansion Caps: Supreme Court Companies Act | Offence Under Section 448 Is Covered Under Section 447: Supreme Court Bars Private Complaint Without SFIO Nod “See-To-It” Obligation Is Not A Guarantee Under Indian Law: Supreme Court Clarifies Scope Of Section 126 ICA In IBC Disputes Mere Employment of Litigant’s Relatives in Police or Court Doesn't Prove Judicial Bias: Supreme Court Sets Aside Transfer of Criminal Case Reserved Candidate Availing Relaxed Standards in Prelims Cannot Migrate to General Quota for Cadre Allocation: Supreme Court Mere Vesting Does Not Mean Possession: Supreme Court Rules ULC Proceedings Abated For Failure To Serve Mandatory Notice To Actual Occupants Contempt of Courts Act | Natural Justice in Administrative Action: Supreme Court Directs West Bengal Govt to Re-Adjudicate Teachers' Arrears Claims Live-In Relationship with Married Man Not a ‘Relationship in the Nature of Marriage’ Under Domestic Violence Act: Bombay High Court Applies Supreme Court Guidelines Income Tax Act | Substitution of Shares held as Stock-in-Trade upon Amalgamation constitutes Taxable Business Income if Commercially Realisable: Supreme Court Judges Cannot Enact Their Own Protocols During Bail Hearings: Supreme Court Sets Aside Sweeping Age Determination Directions In POCSO If There Is Knowledge That Injury Is Likely To Cause Death, But No Intention Falls Under Section 304 Part II:  Supreme Court High Court Ignored POCSO’s Statutory Rigour, Committed Grave Error in Granting Bail: Supreme Court Cancels Bail of Gang-Rape Accused Section 22 HSA | Co-Heirs Have Statutory Right of Pre-Emption Even in Urban Property: Punjab & Haryana High Court 138 NI Act | Issuance of Separate Cheques Gives Rise to Independent Causes of Action, Even if Drawn for Same Underlying Transaction: Supreme Court

“A Second Appeal Only Lies on a Substantial Question of Law” – Delhi HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


New Delhi: In a significant ruling on November 21, 2023, the Delhi High Court, presided over by Hon’ble Ms. Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, upheld the eviction of the appellant, Rajender Bhardwaj, from a disputed property. The court’s decision, in this case, reinforced the legal principle that a second appeal is contingent upon the presence of a substantial question of law.

The case, titled RSA NO. 216 OF 2023, involved an appeal against the judgments of the Additional District Judge and the Senior Civil Judge. These judgments had previously decreed the eviction of Bhardwaj and the recovery of arrears and user charges.

Justice Arora, in her verdict, emphasized the limited scope of second appeals in the civil judicial system, quoting the Supreme Court’s precedent in Nazir Mohamed v. J. Kamal and others (2020) 19 SCC 57, “A second appeal, or for that matter, any appeal is not a matter of right... A second appeal only lies on a substantial question of law.”

The case delved into the question of whether the appellant’s arguments presented any significant legal queries. The court found that the appellant’s contentions were primarily factual and did not raise substantial legal questions that warranted a second appeal. This aligns with the CPC’s restrictions on the right of second appeals to cases where a significant question of law is involved.

Moreover, the court acknowledged the appellant’s undertaking to vacate the disputed property by January 21, 2024, and granted an extension for this purpose. The appellant agreed to pay increased user charges in the event of non-compliance with the court’s orders.

Delhi High Court’s judgment underscores the importance of legal principles governing second appeals in civil litigation. The decision serves as a reminder that the scope of second appeals is not to re-agitate facts but to address substantial legal questions, ensuring the efficient and judicious use of judicial resources.

Date of Decision: 21st November 2023

RAJENDER BHARDWAJ VS SULOCHANA

Latest Legal News