Non-Production Of Case Property And Missing Link Evidence In Seizure Cases Vitiates Prosecution: Himachal Pradesh High Court Employees Compensation Act | Death Due To Cardiac Arrest During Employment Is An 'Accident' Arising Out Of Stress And Strain Of Duty: J&K High Court Transfer Of Proceedings | Courts Must Issue Fresh Notice To Parties Even If They Had Appeared Before The Transferor Court: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Award Section 80P(4) IT Act Does Not Deny Deduction To Regional Rural Banks As They Retain The 'Deemed Co-operative Society' Status Under Section 22 RRB Act: Madras High Court Property Purchased In Name Of Child For Family Benefit Is Not A 'Benami Transaction' Under Section 2(9) Of The 1988 Act: Madhya Pradesh High Court Person Without Caveatable Interest Cannot Challenge Will Or Seek Revocation Of Probate: Madras High Court Divorce | Cruelty Must Be Assessed By Cumulative Effect Of Matrimonial Conduct Rather Than Isolated Incidents: Orissa High Court Merely Labeling Insurance Policy As Comprehensive Does Not Create Unlimited Liability: MP High Court Order VII Rule 11 CPC | Plaint Must Be Rejected If Limitation Bar Is Apparent From Face Of Pleadings: Patna High Court Limitation Act | 'Sufficient Cause' Cannot Be Used To Revive Stale Or Dead Claims By State: Orissa High Court Quashes Order Condoning 53-Year Delay Employee Cannot Remain Dormant Like Rip Van Winkle & Awaken At Convenience: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Stale Service Plea With ₹25K Cost Section 29 NDPS Act | Mere Allegation Of 'Cooperation' Without Specific Overt Acts Cannot Sustain Charge Of Conspiracy: Rajasthan High Court Forest Land Status Does Not Extinguish Private Civil Title: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Decree For Possession Once Admitted In Evidence, Document Cannot Be De-Marked On Grounds Of Insufficiency Of Stamp Duty: Telangana High Court Section 190 BNSS | Mere Presence In Unlawful Assembly With Active Intent Renders Member Vicariously Liable For Homicidal Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Contributory Negligence Under Motor Vehicles Act Cannot Be Inferred Without Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Enhances Compensation Motor Vehicles Act | Section 164 Compensation Of Rs. 5 Lakhs Applicable Even To Pending Claims Arising Prior To 2019 Amendment: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consumer Protection Act | Builder Liable To Pay Interest For Delayed Possession Despite Force Majeure Plea If Agreement Executed Post-Outbreak: State Commission

“A Second Appeal Only Lies on a Substantial Question of Law” – Delhi HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


New Delhi: In a significant ruling on November 21, 2023, the Delhi High Court, presided over by Hon’ble Ms. Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, upheld the eviction of the appellant, Rajender Bhardwaj, from a disputed property. The court’s decision, in this case, reinforced the legal principle that a second appeal is contingent upon the presence of a substantial question of law.

The case, titled RSA NO. 216 OF 2023, involved an appeal against the judgments of the Additional District Judge and the Senior Civil Judge. These judgments had previously decreed the eviction of Bhardwaj and the recovery of arrears and user charges.

Justice Arora, in her verdict, emphasized the limited scope of second appeals in the civil judicial system, quoting the Supreme Court’s precedent in Nazir Mohamed v. J. Kamal and others (2020) 19 SCC 57, “A second appeal, or for that matter, any appeal is not a matter of right... A second appeal only lies on a substantial question of law.”

The case delved into the question of whether the appellant’s arguments presented any significant legal queries. The court found that the appellant’s contentions were primarily factual and did not raise substantial legal questions that warranted a second appeal. This aligns with the CPC’s restrictions on the right of second appeals to cases where a significant question of law is involved.

Moreover, the court acknowledged the appellant’s undertaking to vacate the disputed property by January 21, 2024, and granted an extension for this purpose. The appellant agreed to pay increased user charges in the event of non-compliance with the court’s orders.

Delhi High Court’s judgment underscores the importance of legal principles governing second appeals in civil litigation. The decision serves as a reminder that the scope of second appeals is not to re-agitate facts but to address substantial legal questions, ensuring the efficient and judicious use of judicial resources.

Date of Decision: 21st November 2023

RAJENDER BHARDWAJ VS SULOCHANA

Latest Legal News