Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

"Presumption as to documents thirty years old does not apply to wills," : Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Date: March 14, 2023

In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has upheld the validity of a will despite the absence of attesting witnesses. The bench, comprising Justices S. Ravindra Bhat and Hima Kohli, stated that the presumption under Section 90 of the Evidence Act, which applies to documents thirty years old, does not extend to the proof of wills. The court emphasized that wills must be proved in accordance with the provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, and Section 68 of the Evidence Act. Referring to a previous judgment, the court declared, "A presumption regarding documents 30 years old does not apply to a will."

The case involved a dispute over the execution and validity of a will, wherein the appellant contested the grant of letters of administration based on suspicious circumstances and an alleged delay in seeking relief. The respondents, however, successfully proved the will's authenticity by presenting the testimonies of witnesses who were present during its execution. Additionally, the court considered a registered partition deed that distributed shares as per the terms of the will and an acknowledgment of the will by the appellant's predecessor.

By clarifying the applicability of Section 90 and emphasizing the importance of proper execution and attestation of wills, the Supreme Court has provided clarity on the legal requirements for proving wills. This judgment highlights the significance of alternative means, such as Sections 69 and 71 of the Evidence Act, when attesting witnesses are unavailable. The court's decision ensures the protection of testators' testamentary intentions even in the absence of traditional proof through attesting witnesses.

The judgment reaffirms the position that the validity of wills should be established based on the specific legal provisions governing wills rather than relying solely on the age of the document.

Date of Judgment: March 14, 2023

ASHUTOSH SAMANTA (D) BY LRS. & ORS. vs  RANJAN BALA DASI & ORS.

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/14-Mar-2023-ASHUTOSH-vs-Ranjan.pdf"]                                             

Latest Legal News