(1)
HARI OM @ HERO .....Appellant Vs.
STATE OF U.P. .....Respondent D.D
05/01/2021
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Criminal Law – Child Witness Testimony – The Supreme Court evaluated the reliability of a child witness in a case involving murder and dacoity. The Court held that while the testimony of a child witness must be scrutinized with care and caution, it is not to be rejected solely based on the age of the witness. However, in this case, due to inconsistencies and lack of corroboration, the ...
(2)
DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER (APPELLATE AUTHORITY) AND OTHERS .....Appellant Vs.
AJAI KUMAR SRIVASTAVA .....Respondent D.D
05/01/2021
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Banking Conduct – Misappropriation and Integrity – The Supreme Court discussed the necessity for bank employees to exhibit absolute devotion, integrity, and honesty, especially given their responsibility for handling depositors' and customers' money. The Court highlighted that failure to observe these standards impairs public confidence in the banking system. The Supreme Court ...
(3)
M/S. PADIA TIMBER COMPANY(P) LIMITED .....Appellant Vs.
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF VISAKHAPATNAM PORT TRUST THROUGH ITS SECRETARY .....Respondent D.D
05/01/2021
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Contract Law – Concluded Contract – The Supreme Court analyzed whether the acceptance of a conditional offer with a further condition results in a concluded contract. The Court held that acceptance must be absolute and unqualified to form a concluded contract. The acceptance of a conditional offer with an additional condition does not constitute a concluded contract unless the original...
(4)
KIRTI AND ANOTHER ETC. .....Appellant Vs.
ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED .....Respondent D.D
05/01/2021
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Motor Accident – Compensation – Future Prospects – The Supreme Court held that future prospects could be granted even in cases pertaining to notional income. Once the victim is proven to be employed, the necessary corollary is that they would be earning an income, and future prospects must be considered to provide just compensation, taking into account inflation and the quest for...
(5)
SREI EQUIPMENT FINANCE LIMITED .....Appellant Vs.
RAMJAN ALI AND OTHERS .....Respondent D.D
05/01/2021
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Motor Vehicles Act – Hypothecation Entry and Fraudulent Documentation – The Supreme Court examined the validity of the High Court's order for the release of a vehicle based on a forged clearance certificate. The High Court failed to consider that the hypothecation entry in the original registration certificate was fraudulently removed by the original owner using a forged Form 35. T...
(6)
THE CHAIRPERSON GOVERNING BODY DAULAT RAM COLLEGE .....Appellant Vs.
DR. ASHA AND OTHERS .....Respondent D.D
05/01/2021
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Service Law – Appointment of Warden – The Supreme Court held that the Governing Body of the College is the authority to appoint the Warden of the College Hostel. The Court emphasized that the Principal, being the Executive head of the College, is in a position to know the members of the staff. Thus, applications for the Warden's post should be invited through the Principal, who wil...
(7)
SURAZ INDIA TRUST .....Appellant Vs.
UNION OF INDIA .....Respondent D.D
29/09/2020
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Constitutional Law – Contempt of Court – Articles 129 and 142 of the Constitution – The Supreme Court has inherent powers as a Court of Record to punish for contempt – These powers cannot be abridged or taken away even by legislative enactment – Comparison of Articles 129 and 142 shows no restriction on the Supreme Court's powers to punish for contempt, unlike cla...
(8)
BHARATI REDDY ..... Vs.
STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS .....Respondent D.D
06/03/2018
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Facts: The appellant, Bharati Reddy, was elected to the post of Adhyaksha of Zilla Panchayat. A writ petition was filed before the High Court alleging that Reddy played fraud on the government by submitting a false affidavit for the issuance of an Income and Caste Certificate.
Issues:
Whether the High Court was justified in issuing a writ of quo warranto directing Reddy to vacate the office ...
(9)
JAGDISH ..... Vs.
MOHAN & ORS .....Respondent D.D
06/03/2018
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Facts:The appellant, Jagdish, was injured in a motor accident on November 24, 2011, resulting in severe injuries.The accident occurred when Jagdish, riding a motorcycle, was hit by a dumper, causing 90% permanent disability.Issues:The appellant sought an enhancement of compensation on several grounds, including loss of future prospects, computation of disability, and increase in monthly income.Hel...