Negotiable Instruments – Cheque Dishonor – Appellant’s complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against respondents for cheque dishonor due to stop payment instructions – Respondents offered to settle the cheque amount with interest, which appellant refused – High Court quashed the complaint ex-parte and later dismissed appellant's recall application – Supreme Court upheld High Court's decision, emphasizing the Act's primary objective to ensure payment and maintain instrument efficacy [Paras 1-13].

Criminal Procedure – Application of Section 482 – High Court exercised its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to quash the complaint and related proceedings – Supreme Court observed the complaint quashing was valid due to lack of sufficient cause for appellant’s non-appearance and substantial delay in appeal filing [Paras 5-13].

Equitable Relief – Settlement of Disputed Amount – Supreme Court directed respondents to make a payment of Rs. 5 lakhs, including interest and compensation, to appellant – Appellant's refusal to accept settlement not justified under the circumstances – Court stressed fairness and substantial justice [Paras 11-12].

Decision – Appeals dismissed – First appeal dismissed on merits; second appeal dismissed due to delay and on merits – Respondents directed to pay Rs. 5 lakhs to appellant, covering the cheque amount, interest, and compensation [Paras 13].

Street Vendors – Fundamental Rights – Appeals addressing the rights of street vendors under Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution – Issues of regulation, harassment by authorities, and demarcation of hawking zones – Supreme Court emphasized the need for a legal framework to protect vendors while maintaining public order and hygiene [Paras 1-5, 14-15].

Implementation of National Policy – Directions issued for the implementation of the 2009 Policy on Urban Street Vendors – Constitution of Town Vending Committees (TVCs) at city/town level – Registration and regulation of street vendors – Equitable allocation of vending spaces – Protection against eviction and harassment [Paras 15-16].

Judicial Monitoring – Lifting of embargo on High Courts from entertaining related matters – High Courts directed to monitor implementation – Establishment of dedicated benches for street vending issues – Emphasis on participatory approach involving stakeholders [Paras 14-17].

Decision – Appeals and IAs disposed of with directions – Implementation of 2009 Policy mandated – Parties allowed to approach jurisdictional High Courts for grievances – Interim protection for existing vendors until completion of registration and zoning process [Paras 16-19].

Freedom Fighters Pension – Validity of Claims – Respondents claimed participation in freedom movement under the "Underground Freedom Fighters" category – Applications supported only by affidavits of other freedom fighters – State Government rejected claims due to non-compliance with documentary requirements under the scheme – High Court allowed the claims based on affidavits and recommendations by Zilla Gourav Samiti – Supreme Court held that compliance with scheme requirements essential; mere affidavits insufficient [Paras 1-24].

Standard of Proof – Principle of Probability – Claims for freedom fighters pension to be evaluated with sympathy and a liberal approach, applying the principle of probability rather than strict proof beyond reasonable doubt – However, adherence to scheme requirements necessary for maintaining authenticity and preventing misuse – High Court’s re-evaluation of evidence and setting aside government orders was beyond its jurisdiction [Paras 14-19].

Decision – Appeals allowed – High Court’s orders set aside – Writ Petitions dismissed – Emphasis on requirement of documentary proof as per the scheme to substantiate claims for Freedom Fighters Pension [Para 24].

Criminal Law – Conviction and Sentencing – Appellant convicted for cruelty under Section 498A and abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC – Relationship with co-accused alleged as extramarital, leading to mental harassment of the deceased – Sessions Court convicted; High Court modified sentences – Supreme Court examined whether the extramarital relationship constituted cruelty and abetment [Paras 2-6, 8-12, 17-19, 22].

Evidence and Presumption – Section 113A of Evidence Act – Presumption as to abetment of suicide by a married woman within seven years of marriage – Prosecution failed to prove that the alleged extramarital affair drove the deceased to suicide – No evidence of physical or mental torture by appellant demanding dowry – Presumption under Section 113A rebutted [Paras 8, 22-24].

Suicide Note – Deceased exonerated appellant in the suicide note – Note indicated no direct harassment or abetment by appellant – Stressed her possessiveness and emotional stress rather than cruelty by appellant [Para 27].

Decision – Appeal allowed – Conviction and sentence under Sections 498A and 306 IPC set aside – Appellant acquitted and set at liberty [Para 29].

Jurisdiction of Civil Courts – Wakf Property – Dispute concerning the jurisdiction of Civil Courts to entertain suits involving Wakf property – Appellants challenged the order returning the plaint on grounds that Civil Courts lacked jurisdiction – High Court upheld the bar on Civil Court jurisdiction based on Section 85 of the Rajasthan Wakf Act, 1995 – Supreme Court analyzed the provisions of Sections 6, 7, and 85 of the Act, noting that pending suits at the time of the Act’s commencement are not barred – Held that Civil Courts retain jurisdiction over the present suit initiated prior to the Act – Appeal allowed [Paras 1-25].

Wakf Tribunal Jurisdiction – Interpretation of Sections 6, 7, and 85 of Rajasthan Wakf Act – Tribunal has exclusive jurisdiction over disputes specified in these sections – Supreme Court emphasizes the necessity of a Tribunal's role in determining questions related to Wakf property – However, existing suits filed before the Act are not subjected to this bar – Ensures continuity of jurisdiction for pre-existing suits in Civil Courts [Paras 10-22].

Civil Procedure – Suit for Possession and Rent – Matters involving possession and rent related to Wakf property fall under Civil Court jurisdiction – Matters such as removal of trustees and rendition of accounts are within the Tribunal’s domain – Supreme Court clarifies the scope of Civil Court jurisdiction vis-a-vis Wakf Tribunal jurisdiction, providing a nuanced approach for overlapping issues [Paras 18-24].

Decision – Appeal allowed – High Court order set aside – Direction to Civil Court to proceed with the suit – Recognizes the distinction between pre- and post-enactment suits under the Rajasthan Wakf Act, ensuring legal clarity and procedural fairness [Para 24-25].

Election Law – Candidate Definition – Appellant contended that Jaswant Singh, whose nomination was rejected, should be regarded as a "candidate" under Section 82(b) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 – Supreme Court examined Sections 79(b) and 82(b) of the Act – Held that a person whose nomination is rejected due to disqualification cannot be considered "duly nominated" and thus is not a "candidate" for the purposes of Section 82(b) [Paras 2-10].

Non-Joinder of Party – Corrupt Practice Allegation – High Court ruled that non-joinder of Jaswant Singh, against whom corrupt practice allegations were made, did not affect the validity of the election petition – Supreme Court upheld this decision, differentiating the present case from precedents where duly nominated candidates had withdrawn – Emphasized that disqualified individuals do not fall under the definition of "candidate" [Paras 3-9].

Decision – Appeal dismissed – Supreme Court affirmed that the High Court correctly interpreted the statutory provisions – No order as to costs [Paras 10-11].

Criminal Law – Quashing of Charge Sheet – High Court of Andhra Pradesh quashed the charge sheet against Umesh Kumar in part, relating to Section 468 IPC – Supreme Court examined the procedural aspects and material evidence – Held that material obtained illegally can be admissible if genuine and relevant – High Court’s order deemed not final; trial court can alter charges under Section 216 CrPC based on evidence during the trial [Paras 1-25].

Mala Fides and Legitimate Prosecution – Allegations against Respondent No. 2 regarding disproportionate assets not investigated by State – Supreme Court directs CBI to investigate the allegations – Emphasizes that malice in the initiation of proceedings does not vitiate prosecution if substantial evidence exists [Paras 26-33].

Procedure and Jurisdiction – Scope of Section 482 CrPC – Inherent powers of High Courts should not be used to stifle legitimate prosecution – High Court’s premature quashing of charge sheet criticized – Direction for trial court to proceed with Umesh Kumar’s case while allowing alteration of charges based on trial evidence [Paras 12-25].

Decision – Appeals disposed of – Supreme Court directs CBI to investigate allegations against V. Dinesh Reddy for disproportionate assets – Trial court to proceed with Umesh Kumar’s case as per guidelines provided [Paras 33-34].

Municipal Authority – Parking Fees – Appellant Nagar Panchayat imposed parking fees on motor vehicles using its bus stand – High Court ruled against the Nagar Panchayat – Supreme Court examined the authority under Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act 1961 and relevant constitutional provisions – Held Nagar Panchayat has the authority to levy parking fees under Section 358(7)(m) and in light of Article 243W read with Entry 17 of the Twelfth Schedule of the Constitution [Paras 1-14].

Constitutional Provisions – Powers of Municipalities – Article 243W(a)(i) and (ii) empowers municipalities to function as self-governing institutions and perform functions listed in the Twelfth Schedule, including provision of public amenities like bus stands – Supreme Court emphasized the importance of municipalities generating revenue for maintaining public amenities [Paras 7-9].

Precedent – Distinguishing Earlier Judgments – Earlier Supreme Court judgments in Municipal Council Bhopal and Municipal Council Manasa pertained to demands made prior to the 74th Constitutional Amendment – Supreme Court clarified that these precedents do not apply post-amendment and in light of the specific statutory provisions of the Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act [Paras 10-13].

Decision – Appeals allowed – High Court judgments set aside – Resolution passed by Nagar Panchayat imposing parking fees upheld – No order as to costs [Paras 15].

Medical Education – Revocation of Permission – MCI revoked permission for additional intake of students due to deficiencies and irregularities found during inspections – Supreme Court upheld MCI's decision, noting substantial evidence of misconduct and use of fabricated documents – Emphasized the importance of maintaining standards in medical education and the need for strict compliance with regulations [Paras 1-20, 30-36].

Natural Justice – Right to Hearing – Appellants claimed revocation was without a fair hearing – Supreme Court found sufficient grounds for MCI's action based on CBI investigation revealing fraudulent practices – Held that immediate action was justified given the gravity of the allegations and the need to protect educational standards [Paras 21-27].

Public Interest – Ensuring Educational Standards – Court highlighted the growing unethical practices in technical and medical education, such as capitation fees and lack of proper facilities – Called for stronger legislative measures to curb such practices and ensure quality education – Encouraged prompt legislative action to address these issues [Paras 24, 38-42].

Decision – Petition dismissed – MCI's revocation of permission for the additional intake of students upheld – Urged legislative action to address unethical practices in educational institutions [Paras 43].